- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
laxtonto
| Favorite team: | Toledo |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 2758 |
| Registered on: | 3/3/2011 |
| Online Status: | Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: WashPost: The U.S. is losing Europe faster than Americans realize
Posted by laxtonto on 4/8/26 at 10:54 am to ManBearTiger
You want to solve all of the NATO, EU, and Russia/Ukraine all at once?
Close all European bases except for ones in Poland, UK, and Italy. Then have Ukraine build a massive subsidized base north of Odessa. Then cut the other US handouts to NATO and expect all NATO countries to meet the 5% GDP spending goal or pay an extra national security tariff. Take 50% of all of the troops and equipment from those closed bases and put them in Ukraine and put the 25% elsewhere globally and the other 25% deploy at home.
Close all European bases except for ones in Poland, UK, and Italy. Then have Ukraine build a massive subsidized base north of Odessa. Then cut the other US handouts to NATO and expect all NATO countries to meet the 5% GDP spending goal or pay an extra national security tariff. Take 50% of all of the troops and equipment from those closed bases and put them in Ukraine and put the 25% elsewhere globally and the other 25% deploy at home.
re: Is Trump leaving Iran too early? Is leaving the current leadership in place a good idea?
Posted by laxtonto on 4/8/26 at 9:43 am to Bunk Moreland
Simple question, if in 18 months Iran is starting their same old shite, do you think they could stop us if they wanted to then?
The US and Israel spent the last week targeting electronics manufacturers and production facilities. The current Chinese systems are ineffective vs gen 5 us tech and the Russian equipment is worse.
If they think there is a chance that the current leadership can stand up internally to the IRGC or that the population is in a position to overthrow the government, why not give it a chance? It is not like we can’t force project to the region in days to weeks.
The US and Israel spent the last week targeting electronics manufacturers and production facilities. The current Chinese systems are ineffective vs gen 5 us tech and the Russian equipment is worse.
If they think there is a chance that the current leadership can stand up internally to the IRGC or that the population is in a position to overthrow the government, why not give it a chance? It is not like we can’t force project to the region in days to weeks.
re: Would you be in favor of destroying infrastructure even if it leads to civilian deaths?
Posted by laxtonto on 4/7/26 at 11:02 am to sorantable
I don't have to like what will happen to the civilian population, but it is a necessary evil of conflict.
If you want regime change, this is the only way. If you don't keep the Basij and IRGC from being able to move heavy equipment and mechanized vehicles, any uprising has no chance. If you allow the power and infrastructure to stay intact, the mechanisms that the regime uses to stay in power stay in place. Not doing so means that you are sentencing any uprising to failure before it even has a chance to take hold.
The fact that the regime wants to essentially use its populace as a shield for infrastructure is a tactic as old as mechanized warfare. That is an unfortunate aspect of war that we have forgotten in the new modern surgical conflicts we tend to see on TV.
If you want regime change, this is the only way. If you don't keep the Basij and IRGC from being able to move heavy equipment and mechanized vehicles, any uprising has no chance. If you allow the power and infrastructure to stay intact, the mechanisms that the regime uses to stay in power stay in place. Not doing so means that you are sentencing any uprising to failure before it even has a chance to take hold.
The fact that the regime wants to essentially use its populace as a shield for infrastructure is a tactic as old as mechanized warfare. That is an unfortunate aspect of war that we have forgotten in the new modern surgical conflicts we tend to see on TV.
They have striking the roads, trains, and all of the various air transports in Tehran. The major CC centers in Tehran are all smashed.
If no more troops can get into Tehran and the leaders can't flee, then the population at least now has a chance to attempt to overthrow the government.
Let's not forget that, in the end, the Persian people still have to fight the IRGC and the Basij, so anything that limits the troops' ability to move only helps the populace fight an entrenched regime.
If no more troops can get into Tehran and the leaders can't flee, then the population at least now has a chance to attempt to overthrow the government.
Let's not forget that, in the end, the Persian people still have to fight the IRGC and the Basij, so anything that limits the troops' ability to move only helps the populace fight an entrenched regime.
re: Trump: Many Iranian military leaders terminated in one strike, Fox says 50+ killed
Posted by laxtonto on 4/5/26 at 1:06 am to RollingwiththeTide
I get that the US and Israeli information gathering apparatus is so far above and beyond what the average person can come to grips with, but how in the hell did the IRGC think it was a good idea to have that many military leaders in one damn place to begin with?
I get that their chain of command is already horribly fractured, but did they not just see the US destroy their hardened ballistic missile facilities and deep cover nuclear site get destroyed? And yet they think that a facility in Tehran will be “safe”? It’s almost like the dangers of US targeted strikes are something that their churning leadership is either unwilling or unable to accept.
Thank the lord for stupid adversaries I guess…
I get that their chain of command is already horribly fractured, but did they not just see the US destroy their hardened ballistic missile facilities and deep cover nuclear site get destroyed? And yet they think that a facility in Tehran will be “safe”? It’s almost like the dangers of US targeted strikes are something that their churning leadership is either unwilling or unable to accept.
Thank the lord for stupid adversaries I guess…
re: The deafening silence of the USA returning to the moon
Posted by laxtonto on 4/2/26 at 7:55 am to Knight of Old
Is it worth thinking considering that part of the apathy towards this is that Elon has make rocket launches to be perceived as “safe” and an everyday activity and so the launch of any system isn’t a monumentous occasion and instead the curiosity will begin as we reach closer to the moon?
As an example there were 35 total manned and unmanned Apollo missions and another 32 test launches between 1960-1972. Space X has had 177 launches in the last 12 months.
As an example there were 35 total manned and unmanned Apollo missions and another 32 test launches between 1960-1972. Space X has had 177 launches in the last 12 months.
re: The deafening silence of the USA returning to the moon
Posted by laxtonto on 4/2/26 at 7:32 am to tigeraddict
I had my elementary age son and daughter watch it with me. Neither knew it was happening and both were fascinated by the launch.
That being said, it is concerning that it was not something discussed in their schools, but then again there is something to be said about waiting till the launch was successful before exposing it to a school of elementary kids…
Technology is moving so fast that many people do not understand or appreciate what a monumental of an achievement this is or how impactful this could be to the US and the globe. Just the idea that proving that H3 is readily available on the moon as a harvestable resource should should excite all fusion researchers. The potential long term impact of this and other mineral resources could have significant impacts on material science.
Instead it just another rocket launch (which it isn’t) and nothing special because they aren’t landing on the moon….
That being said, it is concerning that it was not something discussed in their schools, but then again there is something to be said about waiting till the launch was successful before exposing it to a school of elementary kids…
Technology is moving so fast that many people do not understand or appreciate what a monumental of an achievement this is or how impactful this could be to the US and the globe. Just the idea that proving that H3 is readily available on the moon as a harvestable resource should should excite all fusion researchers. The potential long term impact of this and other mineral resources could have significant impacts on material science.
Instead it just another rocket launch (which it isn’t) and nothing special because they aren’t landing on the moon….
re: Jackson: states have power over the 1st amendment when it comes to medical professionals
Posted by laxtonto on 3/31/26 at 9:26 am to cadillacattack
What is crazy to me is that Jackson is catching shade from both the Grosuch decision and Kagan's concurrence...
It is becoming pretty obvious that Jackson is not well like by the rest of the court.
It is becoming pretty obvious that Jackson is not well like by the rest of the court.
Funny enough, telling the rest of the world to figure out the Straits of Hormuz is more than likely driven by Trump wanting the rest of the world "to get their hands dirty" in helping push the internal part of the regime change through their regional contacts, proxies, and special forces. The US has a lot of soft power in the middle east, but so does the rest of the world. If the EU nations. India, Pakistan, and the Gulf States are limiting the engagement of their regional contacts, proxies, and supported militias, then this would then force them to put in some effort to get the ground game moving.
If you haven't noticed, most of the world's major militaries (beyond China, Russia, and the US) have atrophied to the point that large-scale force projection (both via land and sea) is almost impossible. The logical conclusion will be that it is easier to actually do the work to overthrow the regime than to do it militarily.
Also, this sets up the potential for a "pay for play" scenario in which the rest of the Gulf States provide financial incentives for the US to do the job instead.
If you haven't noticed, most of the world's major militaries (beyond China, Russia, and the US) have atrophied to the point that large-scale force projection (both via land and sea) is almost impossible. The logical conclusion will be that it is easier to actually do the work to overthrow the regime than to do it militarily.
Also, this sets up the potential for a "pay for play" scenario in which the rest of the Gulf States provide financial incentives for the US to do the job instead.
re: Trump is lifting Asylum pause
Posted by laxtonto on 3/30/26 at 7:50 am to OccamsStubble
Slowing down the asylum cleanup efforts.... While a big chunk of ICE is working at the airport...
No shite.
Where do you think the manpower came from? It is not like the number of ICE agents is limitless. They have to come from somewhere.
No shite.
Where do you think the manpower came from? It is not like the number of ICE agents is limitless. They have to come from somewhere.
re: Embarrassing year in b-ball and football for the SEC. Mizzou may move to the Big Ten.
Posted by laxtonto on 3/30/26 at 7:24 am to gamecockman12
So I guess FSU and VT are on the clock then? Only one spot makes it a bit more complicated…
Or go to 3 5 team divisions with one permanent rival and 4 rotating games…
Or go to 3 5 team divisions with one permanent rival and 4 rotating games…
re: The Houthis have joined the war
Posted by laxtonto on 3/28/26 at 9:43 am to TheHarahanian
Houthis launch a ballistic missile and everyone thinks "oh no, they are going to meaningfully impact this conflict"...
The Houthis are doing just enough to keep on the IRGC payroll for a little longer as they wait to see if there is a complete government overthrow or just a restructuring of the Iranian government.
Call me once they attack shipping, because once they do, they will get flattened with the amount of firepower that is in the region. We know it, they know it, and it is the reason why they are just being annoying to Israel vs. actually doing anything.
The Houthis are doing just enough to keep on the IRGC payroll for a little longer as they wait to see if there is a complete government overthrow or just a restructuring of the Iranian government.
Call me once they attack shipping, because once they do, they will get flattened with the amount of firepower that is in the region. We know it, they know it, and it is the reason why they are just being annoying to Israel vs. actually doing anything.
So Iran is negotiating with the US…. So even though they were adamant that they weren’t, now they say that they have a counter proposal to the US demands….
Hopefully this help people realize how full of shite their propaganda arm is online.
Hopefully this help people realize how full of shite their propaganda arm is online.
re: Iran officially rejects the US peace proposal & sets 5 conditions to end the war
Posted by laxtonto on 3/25/26 at 11:11 am to Gunny Hartman
It’s almost like the people stating the demands from the Iranian media, which tend to be IRGC, don’t know what others in the government are doing/discussing as they try to find an off ramp.
This is exactly what the US wants as it continues to drive the wedge between the politicians, clerics, and IRGC. The hardliners want to “win” the clerics want to martyr a generation, and the politicians want to not die.
Eventually, the desire to not die always wins out and the hardliners and clerics will get sacrificed in the name of self preservation.
So yes, the US and Iran are negotiating, but really this is just one more step in the pressure campaign to force the eventual regime change.
This is exactly what the US wants as it continues to drive the wedge between the politicians, clerics, and IRGC. The hardliners want to “win” the clerics want to martyr a generation, and the politicians want to not die.
Eventually, the desire to not die always wins out and the hardliners and clerics will get sacrificed in the name of self preservation.
So yes, the US and Iran are negotiating, but really this is just one more step in the pressure campaign to force the eventual regime change.
People tend to forget that if we wanted to, we can meet our domestic demand for fuel purely on production in our part of the world and localized refining. The problem is that to do so would require some type of war powers act to force the oil and gas firms to only distribute locally and not to ship overseas.
On the flip side, Japan and the EU would implode, and local prices would spiral. In this scenario we can wait out the rest of the world, no problem.
So yeah, it sounds cool to talk tough about not helping the US but they know that if the US says "not my problem then you fix it yourself because we can just use our own local supplies" they are in even greater trouble because they don't have the sea power to do it on their own.
One of the saddest things the rest of the world is learning is that the great navies of Europe of old no longer exist. This is something people saw draw down on paper, but we are finally being forced to reckon with the realization of what that means with the abject inability of Europe to project any sea power to the level to mitigate an already defeated Iranian military.
On the flip side, Japan and the EU would implode, and local prices would spiral. In this scenario we can wait out the rest of the world, no problem.
So yeah, it sounds cool to talk tough about not helping the US but they know that if the US says "not my problem then you fix it yourself because we can just use our own local supplies" they are in even greater trouble because they don't have the sea power to do it on their own.
One of the saddest things the rest of the world is learning is that the great navies of Europe of old no longer exist. This is something people saw draw down on paper, but we are finally being forced to reckon with the realization of what that means with the abject inability of Europe to project any sea power to the level to mitigate an already defeated Iranian military.
re: Official US/Israel vs Iran war thread
Posted by laxtonto on 3/18/26 at 2:05 pm to omegaman66
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
NYT: The elimination of Ali Larijani is causing anxiety among many regime officials in Iran. “There was a widespread feeling of anxiety that Israel would not stop until all Iranian leaders were killed and the Islamic Republic fell." Two senior Iranian officials described their security concerns: one said he received calls from other officials worried about the safety of Iran's leaders and their own. Everyone wondered, "Who will be the next target?" he said. Another senior official said he trembled when he received the news of Larijani's killing.
re: Iran starting to crack - President says they will stop shooting missiles at neighbors
Posted by laxtonto on 3/7/26 at 9:30 am to thetempleowl
So let me get this straight.
Iran fires of a bunch of missiles indiscriminately in the Gulf.
Pisses of their neighboring countries.
US and Israel decimate Iran’s ballistic missile launchers and stockpiles.
Gulf states start discussing seizing all of Iranian bank assets of the IRGC.
Iran, now with limited to no capability to attack anyone, says never mind we are sorry to the rest of the Gulf States, let just negotiate….
Iran fires of a bunch of missiles indiscriminately in the Gulf.
Pisses of their neighboring countries.
US and Israel decimate Iran’s ballistic missile launchers and stockpiles.
Gulf states start discussing seizing all of Iranian bank assets of the IRGC.
Iran, now with limited to no capability to attack anyone, says never mind we are sorry to the rest of the Gulf States, let just negotiate….
quote:
Now he can get his job at MSCNN
Funny enough, by the time he is voted out and they swear in the new Congress, there is a pretty good chance the "new" CNN won't hire him.
The mistake people are making is the idea of "spread democracy" once this is over. The goal is a non-theocratic Islamic state, and let the Iranian's decide what they want. If they want the Shah back, go for it. If you want a representative government, sure go ahead.
If you want another extremist Islamic government, Israel and the US will be back in 5 years.
The issue isn't regime change, but expecting all peoples wanting to be governed like we do. Democracy is a system that is counter to what many tribal cultures operates and they don't understand. Expecting to just to walk in and have an entire culture shift to just to "install democracy" is insane and probably why the longterm success is so low.
If you want another extremist Islamic government, Israel and the US will be back in 5 years.
The issue isn't regime change, but expecting all peoples wanting to be governed like we do. Democracy is a system that is counter to what many tribal cultures operates and they don't understand. Expecting to just to walk in and have an entire culture shift to just to "install democracy" is insane and probably why the longterm success is so low.
What pisses me off about all of this is that if he is dead, look how easy it was to do it..
So all of these years the hand wringing over Iran was more about the unwillingness to commit to action than the actual risk or difficulty involved.
So all of these years the hand wringing over Iran was more about the unwillingness to commit to action than the actual risk or difficulty involved.
re: Ex-Prince Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor has been arrested
Posted by laxtonto on 2/19/26 at 8:28 am to bamadontcare
Look at it this way. What "play" does the Brits have besides doing it this way?
Epstein is dead, Guthrie is dead, and if there was video or even audio, it would already be released if it were ever coming out. If it does exist, it will never be released.
.
This leaves the Brits with the problem of how to charge him with something, given the lack of evidence, to move the case forward.
Instead, they were given a gift in this release from the DOJ that allows them to still get him on white-collar crimes.
Epstein is dead, Guthrie is dead, and if there was video or even audio, it would already be released if it were ever coming out. If it does exist, it will never be released.
.
This leaves the Brits with the problem of how to charge him with something, given the lack of evidence, to move the case forward.
Instead, they were given a gift in this release from the DOJ that allows them to still get him on white-collar crimes.
Popular
0












