Surface-to-air missile systems added at Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach

An adversary would have to be incredibly dumb to attempt to strike the US. I assume we would go scorched earth if it ever happened.

quote:

---

An adversary would have to be incredibly dumb to attempt to strike the US. I assume we would go scorched earth if it ever happened.

---

You remember 911? It wasnt THAT long ago

Wonder where the Soliers are staying?

Fine with me!

Ww3 rolls on ...

Why would this be bad?

I don’t know..:

Maybe some crap like you usually post like this:

The idea of Mar-a-Lago—or any private residence—becoming one of the most heavily fortified places on Earth carries several significant public, political, and constitutional complications.
While fortification ensures the physical safety of a former or sitting president, critics, legal scholars, and political analysts raise several arguments as to why extreme fortification could be viewed negatively:

1. The "Shadow White House" and Parallel Power

• Undermining Official Institutions: A highly fortified private estate can create the appearance of an alternative seat of government. Critics argue this blurs the line between official state power and private influence, potentially undermining the authority of established institutional venues like the White House or the Capitol.
• Lack of Public Accountability: Unlike official government buildings, a private club operates under its own rules. Access is controlled by private entities rather than public servants, raising concerns about who gets access to political leaders and what kind of influence is bought or sold away from public scrutiny.

2. Massive Taxpayer Costs

• Public Funding for Private Property: Fortifying a sprawling, historic private estate requires billions or hundreds of millions of dollars in infrastructure, technology, and specialized personnel.
• Perpetual Financial Burden: Because the property remains a commercial enterprise (a private club and resort), taxpayers effectively subsidize the security infrastructure of a business, which critics argue is an inappropriate use of public funds.

3. Constitutional and Democratic Symbolism

• The Optics of Autocracy: A foundational principle of American democracy is that leaders are citizens, not monarchs. Surrounding a private leader with military-grade fortification can project an image of isolation from the public, resembling an autocratic stronghold rather than the home of a democratic public servant.
• Erosion of Civic Trust: When a political figure's private estate begins to look like a fortress, it can deepen political polarization, signaling to the public that the leader is either under siege or operating above the standard rules of civic society.

4. Severe Local and Economic Disruption

• Impact on the Community: The intense security required for a highly fortified zone—including no-fly zones, roadblocks, Coast Guard patrols, and restricted airspace—heavily disrupts local businesses, tourism, and daily life for residents in Palm Beach and the surrounding areas.
• Drain on Local Resources: Local law enforcement and municipal services often bear the immediate logistical and financial brunt of these security measures, diverting resources away from standard community needs.

Classic deflection councilor.

I knew some of the MAGA CULT were rich I didn't think they were on this political board.
I thought it was mostly the portion of the cult that would still vote for Trump after watching him shoot someone on 5th avenue....you know just your average idiots

Has this guy done nothing to be banned yet? He is a thread killer, when he responds, I exit, always