- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: St. Louis couple under criminal investigation
Posted on 6/30/20 at 10:19 am to Crimson1st
Posted on 6/30/20 at 10:19 am to Crimson1st
quote:
So, in essence, these protesters broke into a gated area and were acting in a threatening manner...breaking down a gate in a mob fashion is threatening right off the top, not even counting the individual threats...and you, as a homeowner and husband are supposed to sit back and eschew your protection for your domain/wife?
bullshite! The only repercussions one should have to face in that situation is having buying more ammo to replace what you used had the protesters tried to attack you.
By what you said, I can guarantee you are not in the same situation this couple was in and it's really easy to type out the crap you did when you aren't the one being threatened. Actually, your post is absurd to the point of my not knowing if I am responding to a troll.
That was a lot of words. In general, what I said is in most instances, if you walk around flagging people with your finger on the trigger and they don't have a weapon pointed at you, you're generally not gonna have a good time
sitting outside with the guns without pointing them would have accomplished the same thing, without the forthcoming criminal and civil rights investigations
Posted on 6/30/20 at 10:19 am to GumboPot
Is she totally delusional? It's a private, gated subdivision. You don't have a first amendment right to protest on private property much less destroy private property to gain access. Several laws broken right there. Also, it's not against the law to defend your property or your person. No shots were fired and warnings were given. To that end what are the homeowners supposed to think when everything you see has been breaking into property, looting, violence, assaults, murder, etc. by the same organized protesters. You want to see a real stand, let them try that in Livingston Parish!
Posted on 6/30/20 at 10:20 am to Thib-a-doe Tiger
quote:
In general, what I said is in most instances
We’re not talking most instances. We’re talking about a very specific instance. And you’re talking out your arse.
Posted on 6/30/20 at 10:20 am to AggieHank86
But we were told the fence looked "undamaged" according to the Fox article.
Posted on 6/30/20 at 10:21 am to GumboPot
quote:
peaceful protestors
Has she addressed why "peaceful protestors" destroyed private property and broke through an iron security gate to gain access to a gated neighborhood?
Posted on 6/30/20 at 10:21 am to Breesus
quote:
I have a problem with their obnoxious lack of care or any knowledge of how to handle a firearm.
They both need training/refresher training on firearm ready positions, muzzle awareness/"Rule #1", etc.
Having said that, I support their right to be armed in their own self-defense (especially in this environment where the authorities are increasingly leaving the peaceful and law-abiding to mercy of the mob).
Posted on 6/30/20 at 10:21 am to The Maj
quote:I had to laugh.
IT WAS A PRIVATE STREET... THEY WERE STANDING ON PRIVATE PROPERTY... THEY BROKE DOWN A LOCKED GATE IN ORDER TO GAIN ACCESS TO THE PRIVATE STREET...
Read it really slow... Damn, Chicken needs to put a fricking crayon font in...
Now you see how it feels to talk to you most of the time.
Posted on 6/30/20 at 10:21 am to Techdog89
She characterized people telling criminals to leave private property as an “assault.”
And criminals as “peaceful protesters.”
And criminals as “peaceful protesters.”
Posted on 6/30/20 at 10:21 am to Thib-a-doe Tiger
quote:You left out the private property and the tresspassing part.
That was a lot of words. In general, what I said is in most instances, if you walk around flagging people with your finger on the trigger and they don't have a weapon pointed at you, you're generally not gonna have a good time
sitting outside with the guns without pointing them would have accomplished the same thing, without the forthcoming criminal and civil rights investigations
Posted on 6/30/20 at 10:22 am to Thib-a-doe Tiger
quote:
In general, what I said is in most instances,
But we are talking about a very specific instance here... You cannot be this fricking stupid and there is no saving face for you here...
"I was wrong"... say it, you will feel better...
Posted on 6/30/20 at 10:22 am to Thib-a-doe Tiger
quote:
sit on porch with guns out but don't point at anyone in the street
Not even after they break down your gate?
Interesting take.
Posted on 6/30/20 at 10:22 am to GumboPot
“Violent assault”. GTFO with that lie.
“Any attempt to chill it through intimidation or threat of deadly force”
This women is a dumbass. They didn’t try to stop the protestors for speaking. They just let them know that they would protect their property.
Total BS Democrat view point.
And those saying she demonstrated poor gun safety... This wasn’t a show and tell class. This was real life thugs threatening their property and life. At times mere feet away from her. She had every right to stand their with her finger on the trigger ready to go. If you don’t want to possibly get shot, don’t trespass and threaten people. Pretty simple concept.
“Any attempt to chill it through intimidation or threat of deadly force”
This women is a dumbass. They didn’t try to stop the protestors for speaking. They just let them know that they would protect their property.
Total BS Democrat view point.
And those saying she demonstrated poor gun safety... This wasn’t a show and tell class. This was real life thugs threatening their property and life. At times mere feet away from her. She had every right to stand their with her finger on the trigger ready to go. If you don’t want to possibly get shot, don’t trespass and threaten people. Pretty simple concept.
Posted on 6/30/20 at 10:22 am to Thib-a-doe Tiger
quote:
yeah, because that's the same as someone standing in the street
more specifically, a trespassing mob standing in the private street making death threats.
Posted on 6/30/20 at 10:22 am to Thib-a-doe Tiger
quote:
That was a lot of words.
Apparently there have been too many words for you to digest as you continue with your incorrect and debunked arguments.
Posted on 6/30/20 at 10:22 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Now you see how it feels to talk to you most of the time.
Not really, because I feel the same way when talking to your dumbass. Did you drop by to add no value to the board today as usual?
Posted on 6/30/20 at 10:23 am to Tiger Prawn
If that was the front gate to her home or private street, that DA would be singing a different tune.
See Destroya when protesters had the audacity to protest outside her home. She was pissed.
See Destroya when protesters had the audacity to protest outside her home. She was pissed.
Posted on 6/30/20 at 10:23 am to The Maj
quote:
You cannot be this fricking stupid
Don't be so sure.
Posted on 6/30/20 at 10:23 am to the808bass
That DA is a pile of shite.
Posted on 6/30/20 at 10:24 am to Breesus
quote:
horseshite.
If I'm sitting on my back porch and someone rips my front door down and breaks in I am pointing a gun at them
Umm, I quoted someone...that was not anything MY post said...I am in the exact frame of mind that you are.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News