- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: St. Louis couple under criminal investigation
Posted on 6/30/20 at 10:26 am to Crimson1st
Posted on 6/30/20 at 10:26 am to Crimson1st
They keep this be up and they will have a civil war on their hands. We are in 1984 - they don’t want us to believe what our eyes see.
1
Posted on 6/30/20 at 10:27 am to upgrayedd
quote:
Let this be a lesson to all of you. If you are 1000% within your rights you will be persecuted by an overzealous DA
She's only overzealous when it comes to prosecuting white people.
She's involved in a perjury lawsuit for her role in prosecuting the former governor of the state (a white republican, and a shitbag, but still).
She also declined to prosecute a black man that confessed to killing a child last year.
Posted on 6/30/20 at 10:29 am to Thib-a-doe Tiger
quote:
That was a lot of words. In general, what I said is in most instances, if you walk around flagging people with your finger on the trigger and they don't have a weapon pointed at you, you're generally not gonna have a good time
Yeah but this was not some random incident where someone was just minding their own business and had a gun drawn down on them. You even admitted they tore down the gate in a mob fashion and were menacingly heading right for their domicile. Why are you being obtuse about this? Furthermore, between the large gathering/mob in and of itself and the potential these mob members had weapons, why wait to protect yourself? So you're saying this couple had to wait to defend themselves until they were in imminent danger with guns pointed at them?
Posted on 6/30/20 at 10:29 am to Strannix
quote:
holding a black rifl
Would it have been more or less scary if the rifle had been white?
Posted on 6/30/20 at 10:30 am to ProjectP2294
Omg what a pile of shite.
Posted on 6/30/20 at 10:30 am to Thib-a-doe Tiger
You’re a dumb mfer who obviously hasn’t been paying attention
Posted on 6/30/20 at 10:31 am to the808bass
quote:
In general, what I said is in most instances
quote:
We’re not talking most instances. We’re talking about a very specific instance. And you’re talking out your arse.
Exactly! Well stated!
Posted on 6/30/20 at 10:36 am to Thib-a-doe Tiger
They broke through a gate to enter private property. The reason that you “see” nobody within 20 yards of her is because she had a gun in plain site. You do not know if the mob would have gone into their yard and started busting out windows...or worse. What you do know is why nobody in the mob escalated the situation. And the “why” is because they used the 2nd amendment to deter that escalation. Do you even think things through before you write down your thoughts or just swim in the shallow end of the pool on the reg?
Posted on 6/30/20 at 10:36 am to the808bass
quote:
She characterized people telling criminals to leave private property as an “assault.”
And criminals as “peaceful protesters.”
There used to be some consequence for misrepresenting news.
Posted on 6/30/20 at 10:39 am to Thib-a-doe Tiger
quote:
You can't swing a pistol around with your finger on the trigger at people 25-30 yards from you and not expect repercussions, no matter if they tore down your gate or not
So you can’t wave a gun at someone that breaks down an iron gate and then proceeds into your yard?
Posted on 6/30/20 at 10:40 am to GumboPot
Posted on 6/30/20 at 10:43 am to Strannix
These arse clowns put out a statement stating how much they love and support BLM. And they both have extremely poor gun safety technique. I have a hard time believing either one of them have ever fired those weapons.
They will be fed to the lions. Let this be a lesson to others: don't feed the lions lest you become their next meal.
They will be fed to the lions. Let this be a lesson to others: don't feed the lions lest you become their next meal.
This post was edited on 6/30/20 at 10:57 am
Posted on 6/30/20 at 10:46 am to upgrayedd
quote:
Let this be a lesson to all of you. If you are 1000% within your rights you will be persecuted by an overzealous DA and it will cost you thousands of dollars. The legal system is against you so if you think of crossing that line, be sure you're willing to go the distance.
Best advertisement for carrying insurance through one of hte many gun supporting groups.
Posted on 6/30/20 at 10:48 am to TygerDurden
quote:Holy Finagle, it is like you people cannot read the English language.quote:So you can’t wave a gun at someone that breaks down an iron gate and then proceeds into your yard?
You can't swing a pistol around with your finger on the trigger at people 25-30 yards from you and not expect repercussions, no matter if they tore down your gate or not
He is not saying that this family had no right to protect themselves and their property. He has said (and I QUOTE) that they cannot do what they did and "not expect repercussions."
There is quite a difference.
This post was edited on 6/30/20 at 12:56 pm
Posted on 6/30/20 at 10:49 am to AggieHank86
quote:
not expect repercussions."
@ anyone who believe ls these people are going to be charged with anything. This is about press optics. Nothing more, nothing less.
Posted on 6/30/20 at 10:50 am to AggieHank86
So you agree with the Soros backed DA?
Posted on 6/30/20 at 10:56 am to NashvilleTider
Why is anyone surprised? If a BLM crackhead breaks into your house and you shoot him, your arse will be going to prison, while the Marxist media praises the BLM fricks that broke in as "peaceful protesters".
Wake the frick up people. We ARE headed for a civil war.
Wake the frick up people. We ARE headed for a civil war.
Posted on 6/30/20 at 10:57 am to ibldprplgld
quote:
The sick irony here is that they are civil rights attorneys who are sympathizers of BLM.
This false information has permeated this board and just won't die.
They are personal injury lawyers, not civil rights attorneys. They focus on serious traumatic brain injury, neck, back, spinal cord and other serious, disabling or fatal neurological injuries.
They are not BLM sympathizers. They are Trump donors and have also donated to Giuliani and the RNCC. Open Secrets donations tracker
Posted on 6/30/20 at 10:58 am to AggieHank86
quote:
not expect repercussions.
They’ve already had repercussions.
Page 6 of 13
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News