- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: St. Louis couple under criminal investigation
Posted on 6/30/20 at 10:59 am to AggieHank86
Posted on 6/30/20 at 10:59 am to AggieHank86
quote:not expect repercussions- he is saying they broke the law numbnuts go read the Op you condescending a-hole
He is not saying that this family had no right to protect themselves and their property. He has said (and I QUOTE) that they cannot do what they did ant "not expect repercussions."
1
Posted on 6/30/20 at 10:59 am to roadGator
quote:Of course not. Legally, she is likely far, far off-base.
So you agree with the Soros backed DA?
But “legal repercussions” are hardly the ONLY “repercussions” in the world. These people are being vilified, and that reaction was entirely predictable ... repercussions that an intelligent person would have “expected.”
Posted on 6/30/20 at 11:00 am to AggieHank86
quote:And their home is still standing because of their actions.
But “legal repercussions” are hardly the ONLY “repercussions” in the world. These people are being vilified, and that reaction was entirely predictable ... repercussions that an intelligent person would have “expected.”
Posted on 6/30/20 at 11:00 am to the808bass
They are going to be on Tuck tonight.
Should be interesting.
Should be interesting.
Posted on 6/30/20 at 11:01 am to Steadmans Cheddar
quote:
They are personal injury lawyers
Almost always vote with their wallet. I know PI attorneys that were terrified of Honor Code losing the election
I would imagine the tax breaks a R would give them outweighed any threat to their legal practice from a R being in office
Posted on 6/30/20 at 11:01 am to roadGator
quote:
So you agree with the Soros backed DA?
Best thing Soros ever did for his ideology was to not go after higher offices, but go after DA positions. As much as I hate that SOB the fricker is surrounded by intelligent decision makers to get their worldview out and in practice.
This post was edited on 6/30/20 at 11:03 am
Posted on 6/30/20 at 11:02 am to Thib-a-doe Tiger
quote:
As a gun totin' lover of 2A
I'm calling bullshite on this statement.
Posted on 6/30/20 at 11:03 am to AggieHank86
None. There should be no repercussions from defending your home from a mob.
Expecting them is why we are where we are
There should be repercussions for breaking and entering though and that should be expected.
This is bizarro world where being right is vilified. I won’t bow to it or accept it.
One side was clearly wrong.
Expecting them is why we are where we are
There should be repercussions for breaking and entering though and that should be expected.
This is bizarro world where being right is vilified. I won’t bow to it or accept it.
One side was clearly wrong.
Posted on 6/30/20 at 11:04 am to ninthward
quote:Strannix spoke about legal repercussions. Thib-Tiger used broader language.
not expect repercussions- he is saying they broke the law numbnuts go read the Op you condescending a-hole
You are the poster child for my earlier observation about unfamiliarity with Standard American English.
Posted on 6/30/20 at 11:04 am to TS1926
quote:
I'm calling bullshite on this stateme
ok
Posted on 6/30/20 at 11:06 am to roadGator
quote:In theory, I agree with every word you typed.
roadGator
But I live in the real world.
Posted on 6/30/20 at 11:07 am to Thib-a-doe Tiger
quote:
Thib-a-doe Tiger
Read the facts of this case before you comment and make an arse of yourself.
Posted on 6/30/20 at 11:08 am to AggieHank86
You don’t have to accept their version of reality.
The facts are that without the breaking of the gate this couple isn’t being harassed further.
These people are children. They need to be treated as such
My dad taught me these simple rules. The playground did when I challenged the rules.
These people have never been taught or challenged.
The facts are that without the breaking of the gate this couple isn’t being harassed further.
These people are children. They need to be treated as such
My dad taught me these simple rules. The playground did when I challenged the rules.
These people have never been taught or challenged.
Posted on 6/30/20 at 11:09 am to Thib-a-doe Tiger
quote:
Were they intruding on the person's private property? were they in the yard/driveway, etc?
The couple's home is the first home as the mob passed through the gate which they broke to gain entrance. He saw them and yelled for them to turn around "Go back!" "This is private property!" He yelled to them. When they saw him, he said they became enraged and rushed towards him cursing and yelling. He said at least one of the members of the mob pulled out a pistol and told him he was effing dead.
Posted on 6/30/20 at 11:10 am to AggieHank86
quote:
But I live in the real world.
And there is the good ole Hank... adding nothing to the board, again and again...
Posted on 6/30/20 at 11:12 am to SSpaniel
White people are subhuman and have no right to protect themselves. Those two should have obediently kneeled down so the guy could be beaten half to death, the woman raped and beat, and their house burned down.
The fact that they weren't obedient.... means that they are racist.. and they need to be investigated and oppressed by the government. Wouldn't surprise me if they are imprisoned for a couple of years.. that's how corrupt our gov is.
The fact that they weren't obedient.... means that they are racist.. and they need to be investigated and oppressed by the government. Wouldn't surprise me if they are imprisoned for a couple of years.. that's how corrupt our gov is.
Posted on 6/30/20 at 11:12 am to Breesus
quote:
Thib-a-doe Tiger
Read the facts of this case before you comment and make an arse of yourself.
Way, wayyy too late.
Posted on 6/30/20 at 11:12 am to AggieHank86
quote:
But not the homeowners' property from what I understand, which turns castle doctrine into brandishing a weapon
Thib-a-doe’s first post in the thread.
Posted on 6/30/20 at 11:13 am to PickupAutist
quote:even if she had accidentally popped off a shot it likely wouldn't have chambered another round, was holding it so limp
She was holding that gun like a bottle of windex
This post was edited on 6/30/20 at 12:35 pm
Posted on 6/30/20 at 11:17 am to roadGator
quote:Everyone who touched that gate SHOULD be prosecuted under the local laws against destruction of property. Everyone who entered that neighborhood without an invitation SHOULD be prosecuted for trespass.
These people are children. They need to be treated as such
Both should be easy, because the morons FILMED THEMSELVES committing the crimes. But that simply is NOT GOING TO HAPPEN, and they knew this when they committed their criminal acts.
Just as the home owners HAD to know that the would be excoriated for their actions at the moment that they pulled their weapons out of the gun safe.
Page 7 of 13
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News