- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
ninthward
| Favorite team: | LSU  |
| Location: | Boston, MA |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 23402 |
| Registered on: | 5/25/2007 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
Lol spoken like a true beta
0
lol can’t even get through
the irgc are masterful LOL, you're straight up a f loser
Let’s get it done today.
Yea agreed, so enjoy your life no one needs your .02.
re: Who else thinks Dakorien Moore comes to BR this offseason?
Posted by ninthward on 10/5/26 at 5:50 pm to John Rambeaux
No room
re: Bet Baker wants to embarrass Sloan
Posted by ninthward on 10/5/26 at 4:52 pm to lsufan1971
quote:huh??
Dude hated Sloan while he was here
re: Why do domestic brands feed us corn syrup and feed other countries sugar?
Posted by ninthward on 10/5/26 at 3:37 pm to weagle1999
why do other countries get to use 5w30 while i have to use 0w20?
re: Has anyone talked to european residents about the migrant issues?
Posted by ninthward on 10/5/26 at 3:34 pm to theliontamer
quote:Well, yeah, they are Christian.
Latin migrants are at least way better than African migrants.
re: UK Unrest: Migrants are now being boated to the UK from Normandy.
Posted by ninthward on 10/5/26 at 8:49 am to SouthEasternKaiju
Because psychopaths like George soros and the open society.
Because leftists hate you and your country. They love communism and Starbucks.
re: President Trump gives out Tom Cotton’s cell number over the daylight savings bill
Posted by ninthward on 10/4/26 at 8:14 am to SlowFlowPro
If this is what it takes to get the losers in Congress to act then so be it.
Only progs and democrats are incels.
All the same mouth breather progs jumped in this thread. It’s like the Batman beacon, post fraud and these losers pile on here to discredit whomever. Reality is their behavior shows just how scared they truly are.
Then why post? Obviously something is bothering you here.
re: A new White House ASSISTANT Press Secretary has been hired.
Posted by ninthward on 10/4/26 at 7:59 am to Bunk Moreland
We know you’d prefer a tranny.
re: Ancestors that fought in the Civil War?
Posted by ninthward on 10/3/26 at 5:05 pm to BluegrassCardinal
Quite a few in mine, 4 Yankees and 2 Confederate.
re: Do you support Trump employing a "boots on the ground" policy/strategy in Iran?
Posted by ninthward on 10/2/26 at 6:00 pm to SlowFlowPro
Right — so we’re finally there.
You intentionally narrowed the definition to conventional combat forces because you wanted to exclude other forms of U.S. involvement on the ground and shape the scope of the discussion.
That was my point from the beginning.
You can keep repeating “not an argument” if you want, but that’s just semantics at this point. The substance is that you deliberately constructed the question around conventional ground combat troops.
You intentionally narrowed the definition to conventional combat forces because you wanted to exclude other forms of U.S. involvement on the ground and shape the scope of the discussion.
That was my point from the beginning.
You can keep repeating “not an argument” if you want, but that’s just semantics at this point. The substance is that you deliberately constructed the question around conventional ground combat troops.
re: Do you support Trump employing a "boots on the ground" policy/strategy in Iran?
Posted by ninthward on 10/2/26 at 4:10 pm to SlowFlowPro
That’s exactly my point.
You deliberately defined “boots on the ground” to exclude other forms of U.S. personnel on the ground because you wanted the thread focused on conventional combat forces.
That is framing. You’re not neutrally asking whether the U.S. should put personnel into Iran; you’re defining the term so the question becomes whether people support conventional ground combat forces in Iran.
You can explain why you chose that framing, but you can’t simultaneously pretend the framing doesn’t exist.
You deliberately defined “boots on the ground” to exclude other forms of U.S. personnel on the ground because you wanted the thread focused on conventional combat forces.
That is framing. You’re not neutrally asking whether the U.S. should put personnel into Iran; you’re defining the term so the question becomes whether people support conventional ground combat forces in Iran.
You can explain why you chose that framing, but you can’t simultaneously pretend the framing doesn’t exist.
re: WNBA? Already has "trans" women?
Posted by ninthward on 10/2/26 at 4:05 pm to Lutcher Lad
they wish!
re: Do you support Trump employing a "boots on the ground" policy/strategy in Iran?
Posted by ninthward on 10/2/26 at 4:02 pm to SlowFlowPro
No, the assumption is baked into the definition you chose.
You defined “boots on the ground” to mean conventional combat forces and explicitly excluded special operations, logistics, support, security, and other personnel who could still be physically operating inside Iran.
So yes, your OP is framed around combat troops from the start. That was my point. You can keep pretending this is about my grammar, but it doesn’t change how you constructed the question.
You defined “boots on the ground” to mean conventional combat forces and explicitly excluded special operations, logistics, support, security, and other personnel who could still be physically operating inside Iran.
So yes, your OP is framed around combat troops from the start. That was my point. You can keep pretending this is about my grammar, but it doesn’t change how you constructed the question.
Popular
29
