- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Should Americans be allowed to easily own the same weapons as law enforcement?
Posted on 7/8/26 at 7:53 pm to weagle1999
Posted on 7/8/26 at 7:53 pm to weagle1999
Yes. Arms are commonly defined as anything that can be carried and fired by one person.
We should be able to own all types of guns, launchers, and small explosives.
Missiles, bombs, nukes, etc would not be considered arms for an individual. However they should be allowed for private militias that are organized and trained for the purpose of national defense with government oversight. Think in terms of letters of Marque and Reprisal with merchant ships. They could own the weapons but would require authorization to fire them with safety protocols for storage and preventing unauthorized use. Authorization would come from state governments in conjunction with local sheriff departments, not from feds or military. The purpose being a check on a potential tyrannical federal government, or an additional line of defense in the event of a foreign invasion leading to collapse of communications or national military being overwhelmed
We should be able to own all types of guns, launchers, and small explosives.
Missiles, bombs, nukes, etc would not be considered arms for an individual. However they should be allowed for private militias that are organized and trained for the purpose of national defense with government oversight. Think in terms of letters of Marque and Reprisal with merchant ships. They could own the weapons but would require authorization to fire them with safety protocols for storage and preventing unauthorized use. Authorization would come from state governments in conjunction with local sheriff departments, not from feds or military. The purpose being a check on a potential tyrannical federal government, or an additional line of defense in the event of a foreign invasion leading to collapse of communications or national military being overwhelmed
1
Posted on 7/8/26 at 7:58 pm to VoodooVibes
quote:
Full auto is our birth right
Eventually nuclear weapons
Posted on 7/8/26 at 7:58 pm to weagle1999
Yes
Posted on 7/8/26 at 8:15 pm to weagle1999
Shall not be infringed.
Posted on 7/8/26 at 8:18 pm to weagle1999
Is it not more obvious than ever that a rogue government could Arm its 5th column against Americans?
Posted on 7/8/26 at 8:20 pm to weagle1999
Yes. Any restriction on fire arms is really a violation of 2A. The ATF shouldn’t exist
Posted on 7/8/26 at 8:21 pm to weagle1999
quote:
Yes, no, maybe?
This would apply to Americans in Louisiana, Minneapolis, Kansas, Chicago, everywhere.
Yes, and no restrictions. What is the point of starting this post, unless there is a lib hook?
Posted on 7/8/26 at 8:24 pm to weagle1999
Yes.
Posted on 7/8/26 at 8:33 pm to weagle1999
At the least. We should be able to have better stuff than them if we can afford it. It's property.
Posted on 7/8/26 at 8:38 pm to weagle1999
Yes.
Posted on 7/8/26 at 9:20 pm to weagle1999
At the birth of the country I could as a private citizen buy a large ship and arm it with as many cannons as it could hold. That's the modern equivalent of an aircraft carrier. Now if I used it illegally, that made me a pirate, and the sentence was death, but that's how it was
Posted on 7/8/26 at 9:29 pm to weagle1999
quote:
Should Americans be allowed to easily own the same weapons as law enforcement?
Should have access to the same weapons as a standard infantry soldier in any format that the military is able to use it.
Posted on 7/8/26 at 9:32 pm to weagle1999
Yes
Posted on 7/8/26 at 9:35 pm to weagle1999
Read Federalist Paper #46 to get the answer Hint: Yes.
Posted on 7/9/26 at 2:52 am to weagle1999
Yes. The second amendment of the constitution of the United States supports it. Commie.
Posted on 7/9/26 at 6:30 am to deltaland
you had me
lost me here
quote:
with government oversight
lost me here
Posted on 7/9/26 at 6:56 am to weagle1999
Of course we can. It is what the 2A is all about. In America, if the government does not fear the people it is supposed to serve, you have no America as it was intended.
Posted on 7/9/26 at 6:59 am to udtiger
quote:
A law should be passed that law enforcement cannot legally possess weapons or other equipment not available to the general public (subject to exceptions for felons, insane, etc.)
I feel any citizen who is not incarcerated, violent, or insane can own any type of arms that person can afford to own.
Posted on 7/9/26 at 7:00 am to weagle1999
Absolutely
Posted on 7/9/26 at 7:06 am to udtiger
quote:
Yes. A law should be passed that law enforcement cannot legally possess weapons or other equipment not available to the general public (subject to exceptions for felons, insane, etc.)
Hey great idea! We should make, like, a second amendment dude!
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News