narddogg81

quote:

---

Eurocat

---

Like that Suhr

quote:

---

Aubie Spr96

---

are you an idiot or something?

quote:

---

My old church used to hand out backpacks of food on Fridays at a poor elementary school. They quit because the kids were trying to eat everything out of the bags before they got home because that was the only way they'd get any of the food.

---

then why would you stop? that story makes no sense?

quote:

---

Imagine no religion. All the people living life in peace. Nothing to kill or die for. You may say I’m a dreamer. But i’m not the only one.

---

Imagine perpetual motion, then we would have all the energy we ever needed. I don't see the point of imagining things that are impossible. Humans are religion machines, so much so that the people who claim there is no God and reject religion turn that into their religion and persecute people who disagree (especially them actually). Religion is just another term for world view, and people will never stop trying to impose their world view on others.

quote:

---

You know very well that the OP of that other thread was in bad faith, and you are ALSO in bad faith because you jumped on it like a duck on a june bug, as you always do.

The OP of the locked thread revealed his bad faith in the threat title itself, which was couched in attack-mode language and not presented as a kind invite to discuss Theology.

---

Considering you never once even attempted to address any point being made by anyone in that thread but instead just complained to the mods and got it deleted, while also saying some fairly nasty stuff, who was acting in bad faith? That thread only spiraled because you can't start a thread that touches on Catholicism without a cascade of that of whining. It's weird, threads critical Islam, Judaism, or other branches of Christianity don't get whacked, just the Catholic ones.

quote:

---

literally can't happen now.

---

lol. The Supreme Court has reversed itself over 150 times

quote:

---

Section 1 of the 14th Amendment states "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

The SCOTUS' hands were tied with the language in Section 1, which was based on the 1898 Supreme Court case United States v. Wong Kim Ark. The Amendment needs Congressional work to be reworded, and the states need to pass it. Then there is no choice but to enforce the proper approach.

---

section 1 of the 14th amendment was based on an 1898 supreme court case? very interesting. when was the 14th amendment passed? passed 1866, ratified 1868.
Also why did you not bold "subject to the jurisdiction thereof", which is the relevant language?

the funny thing is the defamation Trump supposedly did is calling her a liar for making defamatory claims against him that she had literally zero evidence for. Clown show judicial system

quote:

---

“Supreme Court Rules Illegals Outside The US Have Not Arrived In The US”

“The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a non-citizen has to physically enter the boundaries of the U.S. in order to have “arrived in” the country for purposes of asylum.”

This should be obvious to everybody, but of course the 3 liberals voted against it. They legislate from the bench and could care less about the constitution.

---

we need a statute that anyone who has passed through a 3rd country to apply for citizenship by rule gets rejected automatically and cant apply. you are not meant to be able to asylum shop, its supposed to be the next country you arrive to where the supposed source of oppression is not present.