Started By
Message

Senate Republicans aren't coming out to support Paxton. Bunch of traitors.

Posted on 8/31/26 at 8:27 am
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
43569 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 8:27 am
Kennedy is one of them.

quote:

On Sunday, Republican Sen. John Kennedy stressed that the Senate GOP's campaign arm — the National Republican Senatorial Committee — didn't have any money budgeted to protect the Texas Senate seat as Republicans find themselves fighting off a number of credible Democratic challenges.


quote:

"We in the senate don't have the money budgeted for Texas. We need help from the president," Kennedy told The Sunday Briefing on Fox News.


quote:

"The president says he has $850 million in his campaign accounts. That's a lot of jack. I'm hoping that the president's gonna spend $100 or $200 million in Texas. But he hasn't committed to it yet," Kennedy said. "But in the meantime, we've got a race, and I'm not going to play-act and say that we don't." Fox's interviews with Paxton and Kennedy came as the network highlighted the massive advantage Talarico currently has over Paxton in available cash, which Paxton credited to the expensive runoff against Cornyn.


https://www.yahoo.com/news/politics/articles/trump-needs-stump-200m-republicans-201029533.html

Senate GOPe are the most feckless worthless people on the planet.
Posted by Nature Boy
Negatiger
Member since Jan 2008
19260 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 8:32 am to
John Kennedy is a Democrat who changed parties because it was the politically expedient thing to do at the time as Louisiana turned red.

He is a uniparty wolf in sheep’s clothing who is good at one liners and putting on a show. He’s got a lot of people fooled.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
481457 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 8:33 am to
quote:

Senate Republicans aren't coming out to support Paxton


who could have ever seen this coming?
Posted by OccamsStubble
Member since Aug 2019
10636 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 8:36 am to
quote:

quote:Senate Republicans aren't coming out to support Paxton



who could have ever seen this coming?


Agreed. Senate Republicans are trash.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
68126 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 8:36 am to
quote:

Bunch of traitors.


Yep.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
481457 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 8:36 am to
quote:

Agreed. Senate Republicans are trash.


The title of the thread is misleading, anyway. They don't seem to have the money and are asking Trump to help.
Posted by idlewatcher
Planet Arium
Member since Jan 2012
98935 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 8:39 am to
quote:

Kennedy


This guy needs to be out on his arse as well. He is worthless.
Posted by ole man
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2007
18540 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 8:41 am to
frick Kennedy and all his one liner shite, he don't fool my arse hes a frickin rhino in my book
Posted by BTROleMisser
Murica'
Member since Nov 2017
16601 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 8:42 am to
That is so unbelievably fricked.
Posted by BWHLSU
Member since Jul 2026
194 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 8:50 am to
quote:

"The president says he has $850 million in his campaign accounts. That's a lot of jack. I'm hoping that the president's gonna spend $100 or $200 million in Texas. But he hasn't committed to it yet," Kennedy said.

What an unbelievable joke our political system and its reliance on ridiculous money has become in the past 40 years. A willingness or need to spend 200M MORE on 1 of 100 seats just to protect the subsequent billions in potential grift is sad. All 535 of these slime balls need to be tied to the whipping post.
Posted by prplhze2000
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2007
58921 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 8:53 am to
OK, playing Devil’s advocate.

Do you spend money you didn’t budget in Texas OR do you spend it where it’s needed in Michigan, Maine, and North Carolina? Three seats or one?
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
29985 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 8:53 am to
quote:

The 2024 presidential election was the second most expensive since at least 1998. In total, $5.5 billion dollars was spent on the race by presidential candidates, political parties and independent interest groups trying to influence federal elections, according to Open Secrets. Adjusted for inflation, that's $2.2 billion less than the 2020 race, the most expensive on record. When congressional races are factored in, the cost of 2024 campaigns jumps to $15.9 billion.


LINK

They are ALL bought and paid for. It’s astounding, but there’s also no realistic fix either. Just try and pull the lever for whomever will steal the least from the taxpayers and will intrude the least into our lives.
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
29985 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 8:55 am to
quote:

Do you spend money you didn’t budget in Texas OR do you spend it where it’s needed in Michigan, Maine, and North Carolina? Three seats or one?


Exactly this.

They didn’t budget because TX should be a safe seat for the GOP. They’ve budgeted to go after toss-ups or the possible chance to flip a blue Senate seat to red.

Someone like James Talarico shouldn’t stand a chance in Texas. It’s a safe red seat, and the GOP candidate, whomever it is, should be able to keep it that way.
This post was edited on 8/31/26 at 8:57 am
Posted by Timeoday
Easter Island
Member since Aug 2020
25972 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 8:56 am to
Senators are POTUS wannabes. This country was screwed the day we gave the election of a US Senator over to the citizens. It should have always remained in the State legislative body!!

Time to start disparaging all Senators who support Talarico over Paxton.
Posted by FATBOY TIGER
Valhalla
Member since Jan 2016
13918 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 9:03 am to
They have the $, they don't like Paxton but, loved the puppet cornyn.

Maybe they want to lose in Texas, it's always easier to blame than to lead.
This post was edited on 8/31/26 at 9:11 am
Posted by cdur86
Member since Jan 2014
1891 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 9:07 am to
Does a lot of $ really matter? Didn't Democrats spend a lot more than Republicans for the Beto experiment? As someone that doesn't pay too much attention to all of this, does having more $ really influence the voting?
Posted by lake chuck fan
Vinton
Member since Aug 2011
24988 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 9:08 am to
This post was edited on 8/31/26 at 9:09 am
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
83680 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 9:09 am to
All the more reason to vote for Paxton.

A bull needs to let loose in that exclusive club’s china shop.
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
125230 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 9:09 am to
At least Paxton won the MAGA purity test
Posted by atlgamecockman
Nola
Member since Dec 2012
4565 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 9:11 am to
quote:

it's always eaier to blame than to lead.


When you look at the legislative accomplishments of this congress yeah, it makes a lot of sense that they'd want to get back to not leading and griping about the culture war rather than the debt/inflation/ai job loss/you name it
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram