- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Reuters: US has used "virtually all" of its precision strike missiles
Posted on 8/4/26 at 1:03 pm to joshnorris14
Posted on 8/4/26 at 1:03 pm to joshnorris14
quote:
here is an issue with this, but the bigger issue is the depletion of US military assets
So, how was your source allowed to inspect, count, and then ascertain what is left, to what is being spoken for? That is some serious insider information. Why hasn't your source won a Pulitzer yet?
Posted on 8/4/26 at 1:15 pm to joshnorris14
I love how every time negative news comes out, the peanut gallery shouts "Lol FAKE NEWS MSM LIBTARD, ANONYMOUS SOURCE," and when it's proven correct you're met with "why are you celebrating bad news you fig communist lib"
This post was edited on 8/4/26 at 1:16 pm
Posted on 8/4/26 at 1:16 pm to Ingeniero
quote:
and when it's proven correct
This has been posted many times over the last few months and here we are with another anonymous source.
Posted on 8/4/26 at 1:17 pm to LemmyLives
quote:
With good GPS, the JDAM can hit within about 16 feet (5 meters), but if that’s unavailable, the INS typically keeps the error to roughly 98 feet (30 meters) for flights up to 100 seconds.
Good enough for me.
The issue with JDAMs is not that they're not good weapons. It's that they have to be launched from traditional aircraft near a target from the air.
Tomahawks and other top end systems are long range strike weapons. That's why they are being used so quickly, because whenever the US flies a strike aircraft over Iran recently, it has been hit using realtime Chinese beidou targeting systems given to the Iranians.
Posted on 8/4/26 at 1:24 pm to KLSU
Too much smoke for there not to be fire.
And it makes sense, given how much we’ve unloaded on Iran.
And it makes sense, given how much we’ve unloaded on Iran.
Posted on 8/4/26 at 1:34 pm to Pettifogger
A shortage of munitions might explain how they are somehow going to get us to pay tribute to the Iranians in perpetuity
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 8/4/26 at 1:34 pm to VOR
quote:
Too much smoke for there not to be fire. And it makes sense, given how much we’ve unloaded on Iran.
quote:
VOR
Funny how all the guys who hate on VOR agree together
Posted on 8/4/26 at 1:35 pm to E Redcoat
quote:
A shortage of munitions might explain how they are somehow going to get us to pay tribute to the Iranians in perpetuity
=/=
quote:
Iran is demanding a 7% transit fee
Posted on 8/4/26 at 1:36 pm to i am dan
quote:
If you believe this, you're an idiot
Well, most of the people in this thread are idiots because this article is referring to the newly procured PRSMs that have replaced ATACMS in the US Army’s HIMARS launchers. Of course they are almost used up. They have not been produced for long and ATACMs are not even in production anymore.
LINK
Its not referring to Tomahawks, JASSMs, or LRASMs. The article title is poorly worded so I see why its tripping people up. That is why that some of you may want to actually start reading articles and not just poorly written headlines. Although, US stockpiles of PAC3 patriot interceptors (patriot missile that is effective at downing ballistic missiles) are running low globe wide as they too have not been around for too long and their production numbers were low. Trump has gotten them to increase production to 2000 a year by 2030 but that cant come soon enough. Old PAC2 interceptors are ineffective at combatting ballistic missiles.
When you see videos of 12 air defense missiles going up to intercept 2 Iranian ballistic missiles and hitting nothing, you are witnessing the use long outdated PAC2s.
Posted on 8/4/26 at 1:38 pm to joshnorris14
quote:
There is an issue with this, but the bigger issue is the depletion of US military assets
no the bigger issue is the number of times you start bullshite threads based on bullshite no source information and try to pawn it off as "news".
It makes you look like the idiot you are.
Posted on 8/4/26 at 1:38 pm to joshnorris14
I saw a video on youtube that we purchased 2000 drones from Ukraine. Perhaps we will use those to knock iranian drones out of the sky instead of expensive missiles.
Posted on 8/4/26 at 1:39 pm to DeBoar
quote:
This has been posted many times over the last few months and here we are with another anonymous source.
And if this was posted during the Biden Administration you would believe every word of the anonymous source.
Posted on 8/4/26 at 1:40 pm to VOR
quote:
Too much smoke for there not to be fire.
you and jnorris are jokes with this "support" behind your positions.
your propaganda does the actual BS artists on your side of this injustice
Posted on 8/4/26 at 1:41 pm to joshnorris14
I’m not really buying this. Then again I don’t know how long that missile inventory has been in production.
Also we probably gave some to Ukraine.
Also we probably gave some to Ukraine.
Posted on 8/4/26 at 1:46 pm to joshnorris14
Rueters: stopped reading right there.
Anti American anti Trump propaganda
Anti American anti Trump propaganda
Posted on 8/4/26 at 1:46 pm to Ailsa
quote:
AwakenedOutlaw??
@AwakenedOutlaw
·
Follow
Note: This report is based on anonymous sources.
I love the irony of faceless X bots calling out an article with anonymous sources. The point is mostly valid, but still highly ironic.
Posted on 8/4/26 at 1:47 pm to joshnorris14
I dont believe them, sum ting wong when even reuters is corrupt.
Popular
Back to top


0






