- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
| Favorite team: | USA  |
| Location: | St. George |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 57428 |
| Registered on: | 10/30/2007 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
quote:
It's amazing how some people here can't have an open discussion and simply resort to name-calling
It's not name calling. UBI is a socialist idea. Hell, it's a marxist one. Just because YOU are saying it, doesn't make it less marxist.
quote:
I have never once even ventured near anything worthy of me being called a socialist
Except, UBI.
quote:
Having a discussion that AI is a disruptor that could greatly change societal needs isn't partisan at all.
Suggesting that UBI is the ultimate final outcome is. When it clearly is not. History has proven time and time again that when technology advances, humans adapt. It didn't go socialist because "there's no more jobs".
2
quote:
People are saying that if you are under 60 right now, you can expect to potentially live to 120 due to upcoming AI advancements we could never make as humans.
Dude, are you drunk? This is one of the stupidest things i've heard today, only second to
quote:
as UBI becomes necessary due to AI
:lol:
quote:
as UBI becomes necessary due to AI?
Wait, who the hell says that UBI is "necessary"?
quote:
This isn’t really about ideology and should be a bipartisan concern
:lol:
You've become quite the little socialist.
quote:
It’s] just over time and having gotten aware and worked with trans folks, and understanding a bit more about the culture and the reality of the meaning of gender,” says the actor. “It’s unfortunate that the film vilified that, and it’s fricking wrong. And you can quote me on that.”
But it isn't entirely inaccurate.
quote:
As for his performance, Levine clarifies, “I didn’t play him as being gay or trans. I think he was just a fricked-up heterosexual man. That’s what I was doing.”
Which tends to be the case a disproportionate amount of time.
quote:
It is estimated that somewhere between 5500 and 6400 employees have left the DOJ since Trump took office.
by whom?
quote:
Many have cited that they don't feel like they are able to keep their oath and are pressured into loyalty over true justice
again, by whom?
quote:
This is concerning whether or not you realize it
No it isn't, little boy.
quote:
She has some brain farts here and there but as far as raw IQ she isn't dumb
Is that why she was a bartender before winning a Democrat star search contest?
quote:
A number of J6 criminals pardoned by Trump have since committed other crimes.
Then they should be arrested and punished.
However, that does not excuse the fact that your government imprisoned people for walking through doors held open by capitol police, and then many held without charges and without bail for up to a year.
But, you keep rationalizing your approval of a corrupt government.
re: Any athletic parents with unathletic children?
Posted by BugAC on 2/16/26 at 7:57 am to TRUERockyTop
quote:
I love him more than anything on the planet, but he just doesn't have that spark that you're either born with or your not. Has anybody else experienced this? I'd love some advice on navigating this because it's kicking my arse.
Sports are important, but they aren't what matters in life. And being good at sports really doesn't matter at all. Being on a team and learning team dynamics and how to interact is the important part of sports.
My advice, do what you said you do. Love your son. That's all that is needed.
re: US tells Europe to defend itself
Posted by BugAC on 2/13/26 at 1:47 pm to ChatGPT of LA
quote:
So no combat
Well hell, im a cold war vet too
I'll see his cold war vet, and call myself a meme war vet.
re: Massie the only republican to vote against the SAVE Act
Posted by BugAC on 2/11/26 at 3:06 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The modern push for gerrymandering came by the right, not the left.
Massachusetts is controlled by the right?
re: Massie the only republican to vote against the SAVE Act
Posted by BugAC on 2/11/26 at 1:15 pm to SlowFlowPro
Do you believe a state should allow illegals to vote in federal elections?
Why do you keep avoiding this question?
Why do you keep avoiding this question?
re: Massie the only republican to vote against the SAVE Act
Posted by BugAC on 2/11/26 at 1:12 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You're going to get the THEY'RE GOING TO DO IT ANYWAY silliness
See gerrymandering for more details.
re: Massie the only republican to vote against the SAVE Act
Posted by BugAC on 2/11/26 at 1:10 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Taxation has never been seen as a governmetn power exclusive to states or the feds. It's always been an example of our duel sovereign federal system with concurrent/overlapping powers, like the police power.
So not every federal action on states is erosion of states rights.
quote:
I already told you it's illegal
Are ya hard of hearing boy? I asked you, SLOWFLOWPRO, IN YOUR OPINION, do you believe a state should allow illegals to vote in federal elections? I'm going to keep asking this until YOU answer it. You don't get to avoid giving an opinion because you are afraid of having to defend your personal opinion.
quote:
There is not a system that can prevent fraud, of any sort, at 100%. Fraudsters always have the advantage b/c they're willing to be dishonest.
Yes, but even you can fathom the fact that if there was a federal law, requiring voter ID, that a leftist county or state is now subject to oversight by the feds, thus a forced reduction of voter fraud via threat of federal charges if those states/counties/polls do not adhere by those election guidelines.
BTW, you won't answer any of these truthfully because everyone knows what you want. Your TDS (yes you have TDS) doesn't allow rationality to seep in. You are against a federal voter id laws because doing so would mean democrats will lose and Trump will win. And you support Democrats right now, because they also hate trump.The enemy of your enemy is your friend. That's really all it boils down to.
re: Bondi: Massie has Trump derangement syndrome
Posted by BugAC on 2/11/26 at 12:59 pm to hawgfaninc
quote:
Massie has Trump derangement syndrome
re: Massie the only republican to vote against the SAVE Act
Posted by BugAC on 2/11/26 at 12:54 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What?
Taxing the governments?
Are federal taxes an erosion of states rights? Meaning, should fedgov be allowed to tax a state, if a state decides it's people will not be subject to fed taxes?
quote:
That's already illegal.
and yet, it happens. Because liberal states provide no oversight to their elections for 1 specific reason. To defraud state and federal elections.
So, again, i ask you, do you personally believe a state should allow illegals to vote in federal elections? And try not to avoid providing an answer this time.
re: Massie the only republican to vote against the SAVE Act
Posted by BugAC on 2/11/26 at 12:47 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
How does this not apply to the 215 who just voted against Republican principles (states rights)?
This is an incredibly small minded thought process to this.
So let me ask you, is every single federal action "against states rights"?
This didn't erode states rights, no moreso than federal government erodes states rights when we are taxed.
You, personally, do you believe a state should allow illegals to vote in federal elections?
quote:
Elizabeth Warren and Josh Hawley introducing a bill Tuesday to break up "Big Medicine,"
The same Senator with the largest contribution from pharmaceutical companies than any other Senator? Ok, boss... :lol:
quote:
The data showed it was more effective than traditional shots.
At doing what? Ceasing a heartbeat? :lol:
re: Democrats are upset that the DOJ released too much information from the Epstein files
Posted by BugAC on 2/11/26 at 12:33 pm to whatiknowsofar
quote:
No they didn't. How they've released the files itself has been unacceptable
:rotflmao:
Hold on. I just got knocked over with the hypocrisy.
"If he doesn't release the files, all the files, then he's complicit"
"WAH!!!!! He released too many files, we didn't want THOSE files released. Just ones that help our side!!!!"
quote:
who alleged
:rolleyes:
Popular
20
