- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
| Favorite team: | USA |
| Location: | St. George |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 57899 |
| Registered on: | 10/30/2007 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
quote:
Yay. Another chance to post about the “black problem “
Ah yes, the soft racism of low expectations. How noble of you KKK democrats.
quote:
“We had been looking for someone to retell the story from a new perspective,” Anthony Puzo, the author’s son and executor, said in a statement. “Adriana was knocked out when I told her that the character of Vito Corleone (played in the films by Brando and De Niro) was actually based on my grandmother. We talked about how the women ran both of our families, but behind the scenes. Adriana’s vision for Connie’s life blew us all away. I’m very pleased and excited to have her on board.”

quote:
Presently they support protecting pedos
Coming from the party of Anthony Weiner, transgender surgeries, tranny story time, porn in school libraries, and pro-ask kindergartners about their sexual identity.....i think we can classify your posts as irrelevant.
quote:
transferring taxpayer money to anyone Trump directs,
Like USAID?
quote:
insider trading on government announcements
Like Pelosi?
quote:
foreign wars
To prevent future nuclear war, that your party also supported except when Trump actually took action.
quote:
inflation
It was 9% under Biden and you said NOTHING.
quote:
cutting safety net benefits
Such as?
quote:
and rigging elections.
Like in 2020? Sounds like you are an election denier.
quote:
Apparently, when Trump's endorsed candidates lose....that's a L for Trump.
When his candidates win...also a L for Trump.
Pretty sweet gig for his opponents.
It's pretty incredible how many excuses have been given for Massie losing over the last couple days, except for his own actions.
- Jews
- Voters all changed after voting for him in 2020 (an SFP favorite). Not Massie.
- The Populists did it
I've been watching youtube videos from Bliss cigars. It's mesmerizing. Watched a video from LifebyMikeG where he grew and rolled his own cigars. Also a neat watch.
Plan on smoking a cigar or 2 this weekend. I have a Padron 64 Maduro in my humidor in mind.
Plan on smoking a cigar or 2 this weekend. I have a Padron 64 Maduro in my humidor in mind.
re: Massie (an incumbent) lost by 10 points. Sean Davis nails why on X.
Posted by BugAC on 5/20/26 at 3:26 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
In 2025, Thomas Massie voted against the majority of Republicans 48 times, which indicates he crossed party lines and voted with Democrats on those occasions.
quote:
He has voted against a majority of Republicans on 73 occasions or 22.3% of the time in the 119th Congress and was just one of two Republicans to oppose the final passage of Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act.
Good day, sir!
re: Massie (an incumbent) lost by 10 points. Sean Davis nails why on X.
Posted by BugAC on 5/20/26 at 3:24 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Do you think Massie remaining consistent on his non-interventionist policies was "self sabotage"?
You are still pretending that Massie didn't have a very public tantrum over the last 2 years about Trump?
SFP, i really don't care if you believe what you believe. In fact, i hope you do. It makes you that more ineffectual in debates. If you continue to let your undeserved hubris permit you from admitting when you are wrong, or even admitting to yourself when the very obvious occurs, then that makes it easier when people poke at you. Enjoy the rest of your internet time today. :cheers:
re: Why are libertarians mad about this election
Posted by BugAC on 5/20/26 at 3:19 pm to Thenoticing00
quote:
Everyone loses when the options are evil and more evil
But libertarians can't win. They have a poor platform and honestly don't have a set of balls. They like to bitch about the other parties but have no practical solutions. "We shouldn't spend so much!" No shite sherlock, now implement something that makes that happen? Oh, you can't becuase you aren't in power? Then STFU.
As much as i agree with some of the things libertarians stand for, it's a ridiculous larp of a party especially when you claim you are serious and have this guy at your convention.
re: Why are libertarians mad about this election
Posted by BugAC on 5/20/26 at 3:15 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
This is what the MDS crowd

quote:
If Massie actually ran as a libertarian he wouldn’t have a seat to begin with. Why do they insist to try and take over the R party and say the R’s aren’t conservative enough?
Libertarians should be used to this. All they do is lose.
re: Massie (an incumbent) lost by 10 points. Sean Davis nails why on X.
Posted by BugAC on 5/20/26 at 3:12 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The fact that this seems foreign to you (and others) is why this MDS era is so fascinating
Ah. Well why don't you lay out how your TDS works so we can all understand how MDS works.
Or is this like you yelling "POPULIST" anytime your talking points get shot down? At least you are smart enough to not yell "RACIST", but not that smart.
quote:
For example, Massie being punished for remaining consistent on his non-intervention stance, which used to be the MAGA stance. That was a key factor in why outside parties took aim at him following the 180 from MAGA when they started the neocon shift last year and made the full flip a few months ago.
You can say he "failed" by not changing, but that ignores the fact that his constituents flipped on this specific issue.
BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH.... and not once did you say that Massie self sabotaged himself. Not once did you admit that he fricked up by going to battle with Trump. Not once did you imply that he should take any responsibiity for losing.
And that shows me you are not a real man. Men take responsibility for their actions. If Massie wants to do something other than podcast and blame everyone for his mistakes, he needs to own up to why he lost. He didn't lose because he was conservative. He lost because he turned into a petty attention whore that was on full display on twitter. And the fact that his own voter stated this and you still say, "nuh uh, i'm right, everyone else is wrong" is telling.

Psycho Loomer thinks she's responsible for the Massie defeat. She's a narcissistic moron. She's akin to Alex Jones. Say a bunch of crazy shite, and if you hit just 1% of the time, you can claim "i was right!". Paul isn't Massie. Paul isn't self sabotaging like Massie. Paul doesn't have TDS like Massie. Paul isn't opposing Trump like Massie.
Any moron putting stock in Loomer deserves their disappointment.
Any moron putting stock in Loomer deserves their disappointment.
re: Massie (an incumbent) lost by 10 points. Sean Davis nails why on X.
Posted by BugAC on 5/20/26 at 2:58 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Do you think his geographic location somehow makes him less insusceptible to influence than my geographic location does to me?
I think his reasoned explanation and his personal experience of being a Massie constituent carries more weight than a random from another state saying Massie lost because everyone else changed. At what point, does personal accountability come into play, or is it always someone else's fault why you/he/Massie lost?
Your entire argument is "well all the voters changed" meanwhile ignoring Massie's very public display and meltdown the last 3 years. But, again, it's always someone else's fault why they fail. Never the person that failed...
re: Massie (an incumbent) lost by 10 points. Sean Davis nails why on X.
Posted by BugAC on 5/20/26 at 2:54 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Still has the same failure, lack of objective evidence, and reliance on influenced subjective takes.
Ah yes, the fake lawyer from Louisiana has a better pulse on why Massie lost than an actual Massie voter.
re: Massie (an incumbent) lost by 10 points. Sean Davis nails why on X.
Posted by BugAC on 5/20/26 at 2:48 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The post argues against itself without realizing how.
Voters perceiving him differently shows they changed
We debated this in the other thread and you are content on going down the same silly path. You still think that it's everyone else's fault but Massie's why he lost.
Here is a post from a poster who voted in that primary.
quote:
To start, I ended up voting for Massie yesterday. I had waffled back and forth, the decision could have been a lot easier if they picked someone that seemed a little less NeoConish than Gallrein, but I probably could have gone either way. I had family and friends that went separated ways as well.
I will say that Massie losing was clearly his own doing. No one worked harder to get him out of office than Thomas Massie. He simply stopped trying to do his job and represent his constituents and work within the framework of our political system to push his ideas and agendas forward. He chose to go on a self-destructive mission, that often times looked to be driven more by personal qualms than any sort of principles.
The optics just simply were not there for him. It appeared he was doing everything in his power to make Trump ineffective, which was not going to fly in a district that overwhelmingly voted for Trump to get his agenda pushed.
This goes back to the classic problem with libertarianism. It’s great at offering critiques of existing policies. But absolutely terrible at coming up with concrete action plans “that will actually work in reality” on how to get their agenda passed.
I argued with a friend last night about the situation. Said friend is totally ate up about the debt clock and how we have to roll it back, etc etc… which I don’t disagree with any of his wishes and goals. However I had to continue to remind him that it is not achievable with the level of immigration and makeup of our demographics and electorate. So until we go back to an electorate that resembles early America, we have to work within the confines of massive debt. There is no other option presently available.
But it still everyone else's fault, right?
re: It feels like this really is the beginning of the end for Trump
Posted by BugAC on 5/20/26 at 2:45 pm to BuckeyeGoon
Trump goes 37-0 in primary challenges and "it's the end".... :lol:
re: Weird how Israel's money goes a lot further than that of other countries in influence
Posted by BugAC on 5/20/26 at 12:12 pm to DyeHardDylan
quote:
Cool, now show us who receives the most foreign aid from the US
I think that proves more that we control Israel rather than Israel controls the US.
quote:
Seal talk
Be a conservative loser if you want. It doesn't make any difference to me. Being conservative to a fault where you never win isn't a virtue. You can be conservative but also pragmatic, but that doesn't seem like your motive. And frankly, the reason Massie lost is because he was actively fighting against an incredibly President, who was way more popular to Massie's own consituents than Massie was.
this isn't a mystery. Massie lost because he went against Trump, in a time when TDS crowd has aligned itself with the Democrats, and where the public overwhelmingly have rejected everything the Democrats support. So aligning yourself with the Dems on bills, as we have just seen, has consequences.
quote:
I still say that his little "Vax Scene" Skit was one of the cuckiest things I've ever seen (
The worst was when he had Jon Stewart on, and Stewart accidentally told the truth about Covid and Colbert was very obviously uncomfortable and pretending like he had no idea the Wuhan Lab for covid existed and was still promoting the bat soup lark.
quote:
The hit job worked?
Cope.
re: Post your reaction to Massie losing
Posted by BugAC on 5/20/26 at 10:14 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You say this without being able to post any policy changes since November 2024, after being asked multiple times.
I told you why the people voted against him. Other people have. He went against Trump. That is the policy. His fiscal conservatism may not have changed, but that isn't the only think voters look at. It's like when Rand Paul ran against Trump in 2016 primary. And he was jumping up and down behind Trump saying, "but that's not conservative, but that's not conservative". Conservative doesn't mean shite if you lose all the fricking time. Being conservative does you no good if it means Democrats win the election.
quote:
It's almost as if, this whole "he's changed" is in perception only.
Again, you can't accept that Massie lost his fricking mind, which he did. With his obsessive Epstein bullshite. And his "i'm going to post the names" to only post what, 8 names, 4 of which were completely innocent.
Massie voting with Democrats is why he lost. The people didn't fricking change. They didn't decide to do a 180 and vote Demcrat. They voted for the guy that would vote with Trump. They want the save act passed. They want Trump initiatives passed. They don't want to lose, like Massie did.
quote:
And if that can work on you, why wouldn't it work on a voter in Kentucky?
Again, it's the voters that all changed, but not so much to not vote for another Republican. Massie had nothing to do with why he lost, it was those tens of thousands of voters that all collectively changed their minds. You see how stupid that sounds. Of course you don't.
Popular
0












