- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Jury Deliberation Day 2: Rekieta Law live now
Posted on 11/17/21 at 3:22 pm to ReauxlTide222
Posted on 11/17/21 at 3:22 pm to ReauxlTide222
I missed some of law folks’ live feed.
Did the jury get told they couldn’t watch the videos until key decisions are made about them?
Did the jury get told they couldn’t watch the videos until key decisions are made about them?
0
Posted on 11/17/21 at 3:23 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
They didn't ask for a mistrial without prejudice. They simply misspoke. Their filing was "with prejudice."
Sure didn’t sound like a misspeak. “We understand it will be without prejudice, but…”
It was my understanding the mistrial with prejudice was a separate filing.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 3:23 pm to Taxing Authority
Posted on 11/17/21 at 3:24 pm to imjustafatkid
Any chance they are using a prosecution tactic with their recent statement of without prejudice? I was watching when he said it and thought maybe he was playing a mind game with the judge. Judge has the motion of with prejudice, hears without said by the defense and rules on their motion without giving it second thought and it’s actually with prejudice? Would be sneaky but hell nowhere near the level of slime the prosecution has used.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 3:24 pm to jatilen
quote:
They removed everyone from the courtroom and are allowing the jury to rewatch the 2nd drone video on the large TV in the courtroom.
Wait, so the Judge is allowing them to see the HD drone video that is in question and that the defense has filed a motion about?
Posted on 11/17/21 at 3:24 pm to OccamsStubble
quote:
there are two filed, on different issues: one with, one without.
Right on then. The only way I'd be asking for mistrial without prejudice in this case is if it was required for a point I wanted to make on appeal.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 3:26 pm to imjustafatkid
Quartering's on...cool.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 3:28 pm to Lsut81
This judge’s waffling back and forth is creating a huge mess. His inability to drop the hammer and make a decision is ridiculous
Posted on 11/17/21 at 3:30 pm to jatilen
quote:Judge has a sense of humor. No wonder leftists hate him.
Judge issues instructions to jury: "No sitting in my chair."
Posted on 11/17/21 at 3:33 pm to Lsut81
quote:
Wait, so the Judge is allowing them to see the HD drone video that is in question and that the defense has filed a motion about?
Yep
Posted on 11/17/21 at 3:33 pm to Taxing Authority
I think the judge realizes there is no case for the prosecution. And he is trying to do everything he can to eliminate any claims for a mistrial by the prosecution and also come across as unbias.
It’s a dangerous game because the jury can see something there to change their minds in which case the judge will have to issue a mistrial or allow the case to work through the appeal process.
It’s a dangerous game because the jury can see something there to change their minds in which case the judge will have to issue a mistrial or allow the case to work through the appeal process.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 3:34 pm to TDTOM
Whatchu talkin bout, Willis? Did that dude think the same thing?
Posted on 11/17/21 at 3:35 pm to BeerThirty
quote:
Any chance they are using a prosecution tactic with their recent statement of without prejudice? I was watching when he said it and thought maybe he was playing a mind game with the judge. Judge has the motion of with prejudice, hears without said by the defense and rules on their motion without giving it second thought and it’s actually with prejudice? Would be sneaky but hell nowhere near the level of slime the prosecution has used.
Nah
To me it sounded like a reluctant "Judge if you're not going to rule on our motion or deny it, we have no choice but to seek a mistrial without prejudice because it just isn't in our interest to roll the dice with this blatant evidentiary issue."
To me it seemed almost like a CYA by counsel, sort of a "we don't want to, but I don't think we can forego the opportunity in good conscience."
Posted on 11/17/21 at 3:36 pm to WhiskeyThrottle
quote:Can the judge give a direct verdict AFTER the jury verdict?
t’s a dangerous game because the jury can see something there to change their minds in which case the judge will have to issue a mistrial or allow the case to work through the appeal process.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 3:37 pm to BeerThirty
quote:
Whatchu talkin bout, Willis? Did that dude think the same thing?
Me?
Posted on 11/17/21 at 3:37 pm to RealDawg
I thought the video they are arguing over is not the video the jury is watching
Posted on 11/17/21 at 3:37 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
Member since Jan 2004
384152 posts
Checks out.
Damn. Approximately 59 posts a day for almost 18 YEARS.
That is pretty damn "impressive".
This post was edited on 11/17/21 at 3:45 pm
Page 42 of 56
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News