- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Jury Deliberation Day 2: Rekieta Law live now
Posted on 11/17/21 at 3:16 pm to rt3
Posted on 11/17/21 at 3:16 pm to rt3
I’m wondering at this point if the judge is going to claim a mistrial if the verdict is guilty, but if found innocent the video has done no harm or helped the defense. I can’t quite tell what is in question with what is in the higher def video but it would seem the video helps the defense.
Further putting claims on the prosecutors for withholding evidence like they didn’t know the defense didn’t have the full data video, they literally tried to use the doctored version of the video in evidence to mask the fact that they had a higher def video. The prosecution has kicked themselves in the huts repeatedly.
Further putting claims on the prosecutors for withholding evidence like they didn’t know the defense didn’t have the full data video, they literally tried to use the doctored version of the video in evidence to mask the fact that they had a higher def video. The prosecution has kicked themselves in the huts repeatedly.
1
Posted on 11/17/21 at 3:16 pm to Gaggle
quote:
Everything has indicated the jury wants to acquit but is scared shitless. Our country is dominated by a leftist terrorist regime
Their plan is working.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 3:19 pm to YumYum Sauce
quote:Even Anderson Cooper looked at him like he didn’t believe him.
But then contradicted that on live TV the next day.
Most stupid people believe cable news over anything else
No rational person watch that interview and thought highly of what GG was saying.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 3:19 pm to SaintsTiger
quote:
The lady juror who quipped about how would the judge if they sat in his chair sounded in good spirits. Definitely not like she was about to convict someone of murder.
Good point.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 3:19 pm to BuckyCheese
Can there still be a mistrial with prejudice? Like is that motion still available even when they asked for one without
Posted on 11/17/21 at 3:19 pm to BuckyCheese
So, what if the jury is made up of totally IT dumbasses like myself. Who runs the video for them?
Posted on 11/17/21 at 3:19 pm to BuckyCheese
We are gonna find out if the jury has spines or not.
In high profile cases like this, the jury’s identities should never be known. Make them sit behind one way glass or whatever you have to do to make them feel secure.
In high profile cases like this, the jury’s identities should never be known. Make them sit behind one way glass or whatever you have to do to make them feel secure.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 3:20 pm to Dawgfan247
quote:
Like is that motion still available even when they asked for one without
They didn't ask for a mistrial without prejudice. They simply misspoke. Their filing was "with prejudice."
Posted on 11/17/21 at 3:20 pm to ReauxlTide222
Had to step into a meeting... Last I saw live was them taking the laptop to load videsos to show the jury.
Cliffnotes on what has transpired since? Has the jury seen what they originally wanted?
Cliffnotes on what has transpired since? Has the jury seen what they originally wanted?
Posted on 11/17/21 at 3:21 pm to Dawgfan247
quote:
Can there still be a mistrial with prejudice? Like is that motion still available even when they asked for one without
Apparently they have asked for BOTH. (according to Rekeita lawyer)
This post was edited on 11/17/21 at 3:22 pm
Posted on 11/17/21 at 3:21 pm to Lsut81
Jet Li and Bridget Fonda, BUB.
MYLIFEISHELL.gif
MYLIFEISHELL.gif
Posted on 11/17/21 at 3:21 pm to LC412000
quote:
So, what if the jury is made up of totally IT dumbasses like myself. Who runs the video for them?
The bailiff apparently. He's the only one that can be in the room with them.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 3:21 pm to WhiskeyThrottle
quote:
I’m wondering at this point if the judge is going to claim a mistrial if the verdict is guilty, but if found innocent the video has done no harm or helped the defense.
This is my suspicion.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 3:21 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
They didn't ask for a mistrial without prejudice. They simply misspoke. Their filing was "with prejudice."
Link
Posted on 11/17/21 at 3:21 pm to Lsut81
Nothing
They're rewatching videos
They're rewatching videos
Posted on 11/17/21 at 3:21 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
quote:
Like is that motion still available even when they asked for one without
They didn't ask for a mistrial without prejudice. They simply misspoke. Their filing was "with prejudice."
there are two filed, on different issues: one with, one without.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 3:22 pm to Ace Midnight
I missed some of law folks’ live feed.
Did the jury get told they couldn’t watch the videos until key decisions are made about them?
Did the jury get told they couldn’t watch the videos until key decisions are made about them?
Posted on 11/17/21 at 3:22 pm to idlewatcher
These lawyers hang around YouTube everyday doing this? Do they practice at all?
Posted on 11/17/21 at 3:22 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You have to remember most lawyers thought about being some form of writer and settled on being a lawyer
quote:Checks out.
SlowFlowPro
Stanford Fan
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
384152 posts
Posted on 11/17/21 at 3:22 pm to Lsut81
quote:
Cliffnotes on what has transpired since? Has the jury seen what they originally wanted?
They removed everyone from the courtroom and are allowing the jury to rewatch the 2nd drone video on the large TV in the courtroom.
This post was edited on 11/17/21 at 3:23 pm
Page 41 of 56
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News