- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Jury Deliberation Day 2: Rekieta Law live now
Posted on 11/17/21 at 2:46 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 11/17/21 at 2:46 pm to SlowFlowPro
To reiterate, Barnes is salty AF, but that doesn't make him wrong on substance.
1
Posted on 11/17/21 at 2:47 pm to udtiger
Seems like they're staying quiet so as to not annoy the judge. Really bad decision, imo, as the prosecution has seemingly pushed matters to the limit many times over, and then after some bloviating, the judge does absolutely nothing.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 2:47 pm to MMauler
quote:
If it's a mistrial without prejudices, Rittenhouse will be suing them for the MULTIPLE instances of the DA's office violating Rittenhouse's civil and constitutional rights. The case would then probably be reassigned to the state's AG or another DA's office. I can't imagine another DA's office filing charges after the sh!tshow these ADA put on.
This is obviously the current defense dice roll here.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 2:47 pm to Ace Midnight
I'm terrible with names, is Barnes the judge?
Posted on 11/17/21 at 2:47 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:They are from WI. They do not know what good food is.
Oh they ordered pizza instead of sandwiches for lunch? THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU DON'T PICK THE RIGHT JURY.
Except for fried cheese curds, those are pretty good.
This post was edited on 11/17/21 at 2:48 pm
Posted on 11/17/21 at 2:47 pm to udtiger
If I'm reading between the lines listening to the judge, it sounds like he's teeing the situation up that it's either an innocent verdict, or it'll be a mistrial.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 2:48 pm to Jcorye1
Barnes is a former member of the defense who is sometimes on the Rekieta chat.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 2:48 pm to udtiger
quote:
Kyle's defense seems to be making some very basic errors, to the significant detriment of their client.
Luckily for Rittenhouse, the prosecutors are even worse.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 2:48 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Oh they ordered pizza instead of sandwiches for lunch? THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU DON'T PICK THE RIGHT JURY.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 2:48 pm to Taxing Authority
The beer is pretty damned good. That counts for a lot in my book.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 2:48 pm to rt3
quote:
and the judge is like 'we'll cross that bridge should we get there'
The way I took the judge's remarks was that they would bring the jury into the court room, clear everyone else out, and let them watch the video as much as they wanted.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 2:48 pm to Ace Midnight
Oh yeah now I know who you're talking about. He's been nice to the defense when they basically fricked him over.
I, for the life of me, don't understand why Richard's became the point man and main litigation person.
I, for the life of me, don't understand why Richard's became the point man and main litigation person.
This post was edited on 11/17/21 at 2:50 pm
Posted on 11/17/21 at 2:49 pm to Jcorye1
Not lately. He's 100% pro Kyle, but he has roasted the defense attorneys lately.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 2:50 pm to Ace Midnight
Hahah Handbrake on Fatlocks Laptop 
This post was edited on 11/17/21 at 2:50 pm
Posted on 11/17/21 at 2:50 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
Absolutely. This is a political trial
Yep. The left has so much riding on this trial. They want a case that warns the American public that you can't defend yourself, you can't defend your property, you must allow these thugs to burn down your businesses, and you can't be armed under any circumstance.
This post was edited on 11/17/21 at 2:51 pm
Posted on 11/17/21 at 2:50 pm to 50_Tiger
Raises questions. It is not a simple program to use. It de facto alters things.
Bad look across the board.
Bad look across the board.
This post was edited on 11/17/21 at 2:51 pm
Posted on 11/17/21 at 2:51 pm to Jcorye1
quote:
I, for the life of me, don't understand why Richard's became the point man and main litigation person.
He's likely super egotistical, too. You have to remember most lawyers thought about being some form of writer and settled on being a lawyer, so they all think they are the most creative at communicating and structuring arguments.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 2:52 pm to Jcorye1
quote:
I, for the life of me, don't understand why Richard's became the point man and main litigation person.
Chirafisi has impressed me FAR more than Richards.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 2:52 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You have to remember most lawyers thought about being some form of writer and settled on being a lawyer
Meh. I thought most lawyers just didn't have the grades for med school and still wanted to make some money.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 2:52 pm to BuckyCheese
quote:
Chirafisi has impressed me FAR more than Richards.
....but he is sitting on his hands too.
Page 37 of 56
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News