Started By
Message

re: It’s over. Biden has a 71% chance of winning

Posted on 8/12/20 at 10:01 am to
Posted by bstew3006
318
Member since Dec 2007
12580 posts
Posted on 8/12/20 at 10:01 am to
quote:

But Clinton had only a small advantage in most surveys —


This is the problem we have today....people ignoring facts and just rewriting history to fit a narrative or push an agenda.

What Fn survey or poll had Hillary within the margin of error? It was constantly +10...some had +20
This post was edited on 8/12/20 at 10:11 am
Posted by redneck hippie
Stillwater
Member since Dec 2008
5601 posts
Posted on 8/12/20 at 10:02 am to
pedictit moved toward Biden this morning. I guess the gamblers liked the Harris pick
Posted by The Maj
Member since Sep 2016
27196 posts
Posted on 8/12/20 at 10:02 am to
quote:

Biden has a 71% chance of winning


Then he has an even less chance than Hillary did and look how that turned out...
Posted by Ted2010
Member since Oct 2010
38958 posts
Posted on 8/12/20 at 10:04 am to


That’s a face that never loses!
Posted by beastieboys
South Jordan, UT
Member since Jan 2008
2190 posts
Posted on 8/12/20 at 10:05 am to
Based on those maps it seems like everything comes down to Florida. Trump doesn't have a path without FL.
Posted by Ted2010
Member since Oct 2010
38958 posts
Posted on 8/12/20 at 10:05 am to
quote:

This is the thread where we learn a 71% chance of winning is stronger than a 98% chance of winning, kids.

Yep. The cuck has all kinds of excuses
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134887 posts
Posted on 8/12/20 at 10:06 am to
I saw this earlier and it made me laugh. They learned absolutely nothing from 2016.

Many people, especially now, are terrified to voice their support of Trump so they won't answer these polls truthfully.
Posted by GeneralLee
Member since Aug 2004
13104 posts
Posted on 8/12/20 at 10:06 am to
quote:

Based on those maps it seems like everything comes down to Florida


Florida has to be in Trump's column, but even with FLA he needs help. Election will come down to holding AZ and winning 1 of PA/MI/WI/MN imo.
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
19711 posts
Posted on 8/12/20 at 10:08 am to
quote:

That's some serious revisionist history spin.


Hillary ahead by 22 points and with a 98% chance of winning was within the margin of error?
Posted by Prominentwon
LSU, McNeese St. Fan
Member since Jan 2005
93772 posts
Posted on 8/12/20 at 10:10 am to
Have they polled the people that refuse to say who they’re voting for in fear of backlash?
Posted by The Maj
Member since Sep 2016
27196 posts
Posted on 8/12/20 at 10:11 am to
quote:

Have they polled the people that refuse to say who they’re voting for in fear of backlash?


I really wish they would report the numbers in these polls of people who refused to participate and/or hung up...
Posted by TigerDoc
Texas
Member since Apr 2004
9910 posts
Posted on 8/12/20 at 10:13 am to
quote:

Then he has an even less chance than Hillary did and look how that turned out...


It's actually exactly the same percentage chance he gave Hillary in his final estimate in 2016.
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69362 posts
Posted on 8/12/20 at 10:17 am to
Not sure why this board is attacking silver here. 30% is way higher then other models
Give him, and even Nate says the unique volatility of current times makes it fluid
Posted by Gatorbait2008
Member since Aug 2015
22953 posts
Posted on 8/12/20 at 10:20 am to
There is zero chance Biden has more support than Clinton at this time.
Posted by RuLSU
Chicago, IL
Member since Nov 2007
8090 posts
Posted on 8/12/20 at 10:20 am to
quote:

That's some serious revisionist history spin.

Is it? Take a look at the RCP averages from ‘16 [ LINK ]

The polls were closing up quickly in ‘16. By the end, Trump was well within the MOE in almost every state he won, with the sole exception of Wisconsin.

The media narrative did not match the actual polling evidence.
Posted by TigerDoc
Texas
Member since Apr 2004
9910 posts
Posted on 8/12/20 at 10:21 am to
I agree. He's less a believer in large-scale effects of the shy/silent Trump voter or polling-sabotage thesis than your average TD baw and those who put a lot of stock in that evidedently think he's still underestimating Trump's support.
This post was edited on 8/12/20 at 10:22 am
Posted by Zarkinletch416
Deep in the Heart of Texas
Member since Jan 2020
8412 posts
Posted on 8/12/20 at 10:23 am to
quote:

Absent blatant fraud,


The democrats have already started. It's called Vote-by-Mail.
This post was edited on 8/12/20 at 10:26 am
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35242 posts
Posted on 8/12/20 at 10:24 am to
quote:

There is zero chance Biden has more support than Clinton at this time.
Clinton is one of the most despised major candidates in modern US history, if not all of US history. People hated her with a passion. People may not be thrilled about Joe, but the widespread hatred for him is not anything like Clinton.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
99150 posts
Posted on 8/12/20 at 10:26 am to
quote:

Biden also enjoys more overall support than Clinton.


Are you fricking kidding?

Posted by jatilen
Member since May 2020
13608 posts
Posted on 8/12/20 at 10:26 am to
This is terrible news. Nate was so accurate in 2016:

first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram