Favorite team:Ohio State 
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:35406
Registered on:7/21/2014
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
quote:

The Odyssey needs to make 1.36 Billion to break even.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
The best part of this is that he was pretty close to correct when he posted about it a month ago when he thought it would only make $500 million. But the idea that a movie with a $250 production budget and $100-$125 marketing budget (which isn’t really an apples to apples comparison and big films have higher ROIs for other films, because more people see those previews) has to make $1.36 billion to break even is just silly. But quickly watching the video, he has to inflate the budget, deflate the box office returns (says they only get 20% in Asia, even though China is the only place that has a low rate for studios and that’s 25%; this also ignores studios get a higher take early on and bigger films usually get a higher take). But by far the biggest issue is that he applies Nolan’s 20% net revenue take from the studio and applies it to the gross revenue.
quote:

tell that to TLJ I posted several examples back then of 2/4 and even 2/5 ratings being classified as fresh. Was so irritated I have never done another deep dive But in t theory you are correct.
Are you sure you’re not talking about critics scores, where a critic can select fresh for a mixed review? For the verified audience score, which is at 97% (and 93% for all reviews) it’s just those that are rated as 3.5 out of 5 or higher.
quote:

I still believe 8.5/10 is where it’s at though instead of the 97%. It’s a solid flick.
Well the 97% is the percentage of users who rated it 3.5 or higher so 7/10, so while the average rating and the “hot/fresh” rating correlate, they’re not measuring the exact same thing.
quote:

Odyssey doesn't even open in China until 8/14 so they still have some gas in the tank
Still got Japan and South Korea too.
quote:

two of the worst defenders in the league on the court at the same time. Not going to win a title that way.
LeBron is not one of the worst defenders in the league. He’s fairly average, even if coasting more in the regular season.
quote:

None of that is evidence of review bombing,
Are you trolling?
quote:

There was a ton of excitement between IW and Endgame. And we were all told how amazing and pivotal her character was to be. Unsurprising there were tons of people annoyed after watching that.
I mean IW made over 2 billion worldwide, and by that time, had been available for purchase and rent for many months and streaming on Netflix. It had 52k reviews on RT. Within hours of Captain Marvel’s release, it had 58k, and to this day it has 100k+ ratings while Infinity War and Endgame have 50k+ listed, while on IMDB they have 1.4 and 1.5 million ratings compared to Captain Marvel’s 664k and on letterboxd it has 2.8 million watches compared to 5.8 million for IW and 5.7 million for Endgame.

Like does it really matter? No. But from RT’s standpoint, this was such a blatant example and it’s obvious in the numbers, that they obviously had both the evidence and the incentive (like people do typically want to know whether a film is worth a viewing) to put a verification process in place while still allowing for unverified reviews if someone really wants to see them.
quote:

They felt bad user reviews hurt Captain Marvel. They deleted all reviews made before the film dropped, and that wasn't enough. The MCU was a juggernaut at the time
Yes because it got like 60k reviews within a few hours of it being released, more than Infinity War, which was obviously one of the highest grossing films of all time and released almost a year ahead of time.

Like I don’t really even care because it’s one of the weaker MCU films especially during that phase which was peak marvel, but it’s silly to think that these weren’t a bunch of fake reviews. And people can still post them, they just don’t go in the verified audience score.
quote:

Review bombing doesn't exist
I mean obviously it does. That’s why RT went to verified reviews, and IMDB has to use a weighting algorithm. And it works both ways. Melania has a 99% verified score and a 4.9/5 on RT on 2,500+ reviews but a 38% and 2.3/5 on 10,000+ total reviews. I probably wouldn’t like it (not really into documentaries like that anyways), but given that, I’m just not going to watch it so I won’t review it. So obviously those unverified reviews might include some who actually weren’t going to like it anyway but watched, but it will also include those who would like it and did watch it. So clearly that discrepancy was due to review bombing, even if the unverified will typically be lower.
quote:

only bombed because they didn't have enough money left over to buy every ticket to every theater it was being shown. The Odyssey teaching them lessons.
I mean they’re getting bought out so while it’s silly to spend $1 to get 50-60 cents in return, but it makes more sense in the middle of a contentious acquisition.
quote:

Man, people get their shorts in a twist if you talk about the movie before you've seen it.
I mean I’m talking about things that are irrelevant to my own personal ratings. I was always interested in box office data since I was a kid and would read the box office estimates in the local newspaper, and I’ve been interested in reviews since I was in college when I had a computer lab job and just sat and browsed the internet when I had nothing to do else to do (how I found tigerdroppings before the OSU-LSU 2007 national championship game).
quote:

You think this is Nolan’s best film?
I’m seeing it this weekend. It’s going to be tough to top TDK and Inception for me personally, but those are 2 of my favorite films of all time. But I fully expect that I’ll enjoy it since I’ve yet to not enjoy a Nolan film (haven’t seen following) even his weaker ones.
quote:

When all else fails put community watch on ratings for supergirl and the odyssey.
I don’t even get the comparison between Supergirl and The Oddysey. Supergirl has a B- cinema score, 53% RT score with an average rating of 5.6/10, a 74% audience score with an average rating of 3.9/5, letterboxd score of 3.1/5, and a 6.1/10 in IMDB. And it was a box office bomb.

Like the data for Supergirl show a film people consider mediocre to bad across critics and audiences alike, and The Oddysey shows a film that people consider great to excellent across critics and audience alike.

And in the case of Supergirl, the impact isn’t isolated to a single film, since it’s part of a cinematic universe where the quality of films can have a material impact on the financial returns of later films. If there was ever a film that needed manipulation, it was Supergirl, not The Oddysey.
quote:

Your 97% is a fake number
it’s not only not a fake number, it’s consistent with an A cinema score, 81% definitely recommend postrack score, the 4.4/5 letterboxd score, and the 8.4 IMDB score despite clear review bombing (since 9.8% rated it as a 1 while only only 6.9% rated it 2-6). I don’t know why people are being so weird about this. It’s a typical Nolan film with acclaim with both critics and general audiences, even the snobbier ones.
quote:

think Spiderman coming out in two weeks means Odyssey will be more front-loaded as the crossover audience shifts from Odyssey to Spiderman. Seems like a pretty safe bet.
Yes, but they drop relative to a baseline. This is why 1st to 2nd weekend drops are so important because if say it drops 40% or less next weekend, then while maybe it would only drop 30% in weekend 3, then instead a 45% drop would still put it at $40 million and $100-150 million more moving forward.

I mean in terms of world wide box office, it’s opened over 40% higher than Oppenheimer (Japan, South Korea, and China yet to open but I suspect it was do better in Japan than Oppenheimer for obvious reasons) and Oppenheimer made nearly a billion ($976 million), so it doesn’t need to even come close to the legs of Oppenheimer to hit a billion (roughly $1.4 billion with the same legs).
quote:

Perhaps Spiderman and The Odyssey don't have a lot of crossover audience.
There is but I think this is the same reason Dune 3 and Doomsday will be releasing the same day. Like my boys will go with me to see Spidey and the Avengers, but they won’t be going with me to see Oddysey or Dune. So I suspect we’ll get a younger skewed audience for Marvel. But either way I’ll be seeing all 4 in the theaters, as will my brother and his 2 friends I go to see these with.
quote:

A billion would be surprising for an R rated movie with Spiderman coming up, but it definitely is possible. Going to have to keep up the pace this weekend for sure if it's going to hit that.
Why? Looking at the domestic box office of 4 of Nolan’s biggest films (TDK, TDKR, Inception, and Oppenheimer) 60% to 70% of the domestic box office is accounted for in the first 2 weeks. It has a 5 week IMAX exclusive window, and the IMAX theater in London is sold out until until like September 10th, so the theaters generating the highest per ticket revenue will be strong for a solid month.

Not to mention while there is only so many screens and theaters, I think people underestimate how much capacity is out there (see Barbieheimer). I mean Dune 3 and Doomsday are literally opening the same day, and both will likely be huge hits.
quote:

That's not a goal post move. It's the truth. It hasn't hit break even yet.
I mean if a film meets or exceed its production budget on the opening weekend, then even films with poor legs will turn a profit. This will likely break a billion, so the big question is how much more than a billion will it make.
quote:

Guess you missed the press tour
I guess I just find it funny because up until like 2 months ago he was one of the hated directors by the far left, due to his casting choices (no Indians in Dunkirk; no Japanese perspective in Oppenheimer) and his “right wing” plots like “anti-occupy Wall Street” in TDKR (since Bane attacks theirstock market) and “a supporter of the Bush era patriot act” (since they ignored the whole Lucious Fox position and Batman destroying the tech). Like but this is a good example of horseshoe theory and how stupidity does a lot of the work bringing them together.

And all I see of the press tour we like Matt Damon shocked Tom Holland had never seen the The Matrix or Anne Hathaway and Matt Damon talking about turning down roles and both regrets and in Damon’s case, thankful Ridley convinced him to do The Martian.
quote:

Like the director and cast?
Like the least terminally online person is Nolan, who has never had a smart phone and doesn’t use email (I’m sure an assistant or someone has to use one for him). And I can’t think of anyone in the cast who is either.
quote:

so you somehow think the fact he’s a “conservative” reviewer gives him credibility when he announces his love for the film that uses an African Helen and transgender warrior?
Yes, I think a person who watched a film, whose job is to watch and review films, who would ideologically more likely to take issue with the casting if it’s an issue, has more credibility than people who haven’t seen it. And I think that’s especially for people who terminally only who get caught up in the dumbest culture war stuff.