Favorite team:LSU 
Location:Texas
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:9936
Registered on:4/25/2004
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
[img]https://i.redd.it/63lfhksmyic91.jpg[/img] and then reneged on his $45M/month once he secured the nomination. ...
[quote]Authority would plainly divest to the deputy secretary consistent with the law creating said departments.[/quote] As long as those laws stay stable/clear, I agree....
In my scenario, there would be no Secretary and there would be a dispute over who the authority would be execute the delegated authority. I'll admit it's over my head in the weeds of administrative law. Other theories are also welcome. ...
Presidential administrations lose cases, baw. I'm not even saying he'll lose, though. Notoriety can move public opinion. Presidents try to protect their legacies all the time. It ain't no thang. ...
So you think no parties would sue over an executive order that claimed that he could?...
So he's protecting the authority from his own vice president. Good theory. ...
I just don't think that will hold water, Bass, sorry. ...
He's delegating to a cabinet official. And maybe he can and maybe he can't. Courts are the ones that tell the president he can't, so that would be the recourse. I'm open to better explanations if you've got them ("Biden is dying" isn't it)....
I agree. It's questionable constitutionally. But the previous president was impeached for misusing Congressionally approved military aid and I imagine Biden would consider pulling whatever levers he thinks he's got. ...
There need be no conspiracy. It would only take the President. ...
A non-political official (non-appointee career person), but non-appointees don't have full statutory authority to do everything Senate-appointed secretaries can. Idea, I think, is to get certain changes tied up in court and made into political footballs. ...
No, there's no secretary in that situation. ...
Future presidents who don't get secretaries of those agencies confirmed?...
[quote]So for very specific functions, the president is establishing in law that he no longer is in control/has the last say, and that power has been delegated to someone else. That makes no sense.[/quote] Sure it does. He's protecting it from future presidents. ...
So naive. There's no Biden to kill. We've all been seeing a hologram since 1994. ...

re: Why do men vote democrat?

Posted by TigerDoc on 7/19/24 at 2:49 pm
[quote]I voted for a Democrat governor over this current Republican we have. Democrat is someone I met a long time ago and was pretty cool (Mark Begich) Republican ran on tripling the PFD payout to Alaskans and nothing more. He won, unfortunately.[/quote] yeah, and that sort of cross-party ...

re: Why do men vote democrat?

Posted by TigerDoc on 7/19/24 at 1:40 pm
[quote]There’s a lot of reasons, tbh. The ones that I know do so for one of the following reasons:[/quote] This list is fine, but missing the big one. [quote]The survey indicated that the vast majority of parents with teens have passed along their political loyalties. Roughly eight-in-ten par...

re: Skenes about to pitch

Posted by TigerDoc on 7/16/24 at 7:21 pm
These uniforms are putrid. :lol:...