re: In WW2 we firebombed millions and then cluster bombed the rescuers

3, running with Wallace. The other two got stomped by Nixon and Reagan.

quote:

---

a child’s throat

---

quote:

---

the other is a morally correct US war method.

---

Not this fricking idiocy again.

quote:

---

One is “terrorism”, the other is a morally correct US war method.

---

Yes. Next question

quote:

---

What does this have to do with the strategy of turning people against their government in Muslim/Middle Eastern shite holes?

---

Deflect, deflect, deflect, ad nauseam.

Your shite is so old and predictable, yet you never tire of it. Something's really wrong with your wiring, pal. But that's been known for years.

Just a bad take, not good.

quote:

---

It's called a joke

---

quote:

---

trinidadtiger

---

Based AF.

quote:

---

The threat level is exponentially different.

---

Now do a primitive nuclear device, in a shipping container, that also is full of food and water being unloaded in New York Harbor, occupied by a devout Muslim. who has the same mindset, as the 9-11 pilots.

He could kill more Americans than World War II.

quote:

---

There is a lot of territory between firebombing cities of millions and doing nothing. Surely you understand that.

---

If you read my post you will notice that I did not advocate fire bombing cities.

I advocate the elimination of the murderous Islamic cult running Iran. I would advocate for the minimum number of innocent deaths as possible. Remember that the Islamic Government has murdered thousands of their own protesters!

There has never been a clean war, and there never will be. But while I am forced to accept “collateral” casualties, I do not advocate international targeting of the innocent.

So, I didn’t advocate the far extreme of fire bombing cities, I assume you are not advocating the extreme of “doing nothing”. So what exactly are you advocating?

quote:

---

You should start another account and call yourself Tehran Rose Pro just for this war. You are one continuous propaganda stream in favor of the murderous thug regime currently controlling Iran.

---

I am literally doing none of this.

The regime is terrible. That has nothing to do with my comments.

quote:

---

Unconditional surrender works.

---

Many historians have argued that the demand for “unconditional surrender” likely prolonged WWII. Had the the Anglo-Americans been open to negotiating with elements within the Wehrmacht who were increasingly aware of Hitler’s destructive path, we might have seen more attempts to remove him from power.

As it was, Germany continued fighting because they saw the Soviet onslaught as an ideological fight to the death. The harsh terms of unconditional surrender thus pushed them to resist to the bitter end, ultimately dooming much of Eastern Europe to fall under the control of Stalinist Rusdia.


In contrast, the Allies wisely tempered their stance with Japan. They backed off their unconditional surrender demand, allowing Japan to retain its imperial system as a matter of national pride. This flexibility may have played a key role in bringing the war to a quicker close. And thus saved an untold number of both American and Japanese lives.

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.