Started By
Message

re: Gavin Newsom has banned political ’memes’ in California.

Posted on 9/18/24 at 9:18 am to
Posted by Westbank111
Armpit of America
Member since Sep 2013
4592 posts
Posted on 9/18/24 at 9:18 am to
that POS Newsome has one of the most punchable faces i’ve ever seen! a condescending, elitist, sociopath, communist scumbag.

if Kamala steals this one, look for the Globalist to install Newsome down the road. He’s the USA version of Canada’s Trudeau, bought and paid for by the CCP!

Traitorous POS needs to be hung in Town Square!
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128843 posts
Posted on 9/18/24 at 9:18 am to
Yes. But that’s the prime mover.
Posted by FreddieMac
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2010
24922 posts
Posted on 9/18/24 at 9:19 am to
quote:

didn’t realize Gavin Newscum could over ride the Constitution.


This is how it starts, it is going to be immediately challenged. Hell Elon laughed and reposted the satire that caused Newsom's panties to get into a wad and it went viral again. Basically daring him to do something about it.
Posted by themunch
bottom of the list
Member since Jan 2007
71977 posts
Posted on 9/18/24 at 9:19 am to
If they are fakes then they are fakes. No need to ban anything.

This post was edited on 9/18/24 at 9:21 am
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477219 posts
Posted on 9/18/24 at 9:21 am to
quote:

If you think you haven’t taken a position on this

I never said that.

Again

quote:

Where did I say I supported this law?

'
I bolded to help you, since you seem to be having difficulty answering a simple question.

Now you're doubling down on being wrong by ignoring the words used.

quote:

I’ll assume that you struggle making friends

Tripling down on being wrong

quote:

and (assuming you’ve been married) that you’ve gone through a divorce.

Quadrupling down on being wrong

Posted by OLDBEACHCOMBER
Member since Jan 2004
7612 posts
Posted on 9/18/24 at 9:22 am to
quote:

Even requiring a chat GPT watermark at the bottom would do it.


I can't argue against this notion.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477219 posts
Posted on 9/18/24 at 9:22 am to
quote:

If they are fakes then they are fakes. No need to ban anything.


Outright ban will likely be problematic.

If they want to have a higher chance of success, they need to work on the civil side, first.
Posted by TerryDawg03
The Deep South
Member since Dec 2012
17966 posts
Posted on 9/18/24 at 9:25 am to
quote:

I do think it needs to be clear if we don’t allow for defamation suits related to politicians that something purporting to be someone it isn’t is satire and not real.


This is why we have laws covering libel, slander and fraud.

If they’re a candidate in a large enough election where memes and deep fakes are made, they have the resources to file suit.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
63087 posts
Posted on 9/18/24 at 9:26 am to
quote:

And? Doesn't dispute what I said, only confirms what I said.


No, it invalidates what you said about MAGA because it’s a problem across the board.

quote:

Is MAGA somehow removed from the issues of "the hive mind" you posted above? If not, then I'm right and have been this entire time.


I’ve said it’s a problem across the board from my first post. Explicitly.

You struggle with communication on both sides.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477219 posts
Posted on 9/18/24 at 9:26 am to
quote:

This is why we have laws covering libel, slander and fraud.

If they’re a candidate in a large enough election where memes and deep fakes are made, they have the resources to file suit.


It's almost impossible for a politician to win a libel/slander suit, as they're public figures. I think that's what he was referencing.
Posted by llfshoals
Member since Nov 2010
20919 posts
Posted on 9/18/24 at 9:28 am to
quote:

Inflation lags. We may not even be feeling Biden's inflation yet. ...
I’d rather use one you didn’t construct to try and prove your objectivity when you got called on it and use one instead that shows a bias that you just posted prior.

Unless you’re just dumb enough to think inflation takes 4 years to manifest.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477219 posts
Posted on 9/18/24 at 9:28 am to
quote:

I’ve said it’s a problem across the board from my first post. Explicitly.

And MAGA is included in "across the board", which means my statement is, was, and will continue to be correct.

Pointing out specific examples of MAGA engaging in it does not require referencing how other groups do it, when those being referenced are (1) part of MAGA and (2) engaging in specific NPC-MAGA talking points/partisan brain rot.
Posted by The Egg
Houston, TX
Member since Dec 2004
83735 posts
Posted on 9/18/24 at 9:28 am to
if you're good at something, don't do it for free

if you're bad at something, ban it
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 9/18/24 at 9:30 am to
quote:


And MAGA is included in "across the board", which means my statement is, was, and will continue to be correct.



Apparently, the game is to keep re-framing shite until you can be considered correct.

It reeks of insecurity.
This post was edited on 9/18/24 at 9:32 am
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477219 posts
Posted on 9/18/24 at 9:31 am to
quote:

I’d rather use one you didn’t construct to try and prove your objectivity when you got called on it and use one instead that shows a bias that you just posted prior.

Unless you’re just dumb enough to think inflation takes 4 years to manifest.

Saying inflation lags is a non-subjective statement. I don't think anyone will even claim it's an incorrect statement.

Saying that we mays not yet be feeling the effects of one major set of printing has nothing to do with a subjectivity or preference. It's saying that we may be fricked up with inflation for a long time and it's a legitimate concern.

That comment isn't even a partisan statement, as both Biden and Trump's inflation are accounted for. It's just a question of how long we feel the effects of the trillions they both printed. There is no claim one is better or worse or any subjective/partisan assessment involved.
Posted by BayouBaw84
Member since Oct 2016
3317 posts
Posted on 9/18/24 at 9:32 am to
California is a cancer and needs to be cut out ASAP.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477219 posts
Posted on 9/18/24 at 9:32 am to
quote:

Apparently, the game is to keep re-framing shite until you can be considered correct.

Rog, he's the one who injected that framing.

I'm applying his framing to my comment.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
63087 posts
Posted on 9/18/24 at 9:32 am to
quote:

Yes. But that’s the prime mover.


I always assumed he didn’t have a father figure.

His soft defense of pedophilia made me think abuse, but he denied that at one point. Who knows?

I bet his mother is something else though.
Posted by jeffsdad
Member since Mar 2007
24891 posts
Posted on 9/18/24 at 9:33 am to
Anyone here from California? I want to send you some memes
Posted by I20goon
about 7mi down a dirt road
Member since Aug 2013
19829 posts
Posted on 9/18/24 at 9:34 am to
quote:

Inflation lags. We may not even be feeling Biden's inflation yet. ...
quote:

I’d rather use one you didn’t construct to try and prove your objectivity when you got called on it and use one instead that shows a bias that you just posted prior.

Unless you’re just dumb enough to think inflation takes 4 years to manifest.
that's just a sideways approach to being able to make the claim that the inflation now is Trump's fault.
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram