re: Gavin Newsom has banned political ’memes’ in California.

quote:

---

His soft defense of pedophilia

---

quote:

---

Saying inflation lags is a non-subjective statement. I don't think anyone will even claim it's an incorrect statement.

---

Saying it lags 4 years is both incorrect and subjective.

quote:

---

Saying that we mays not yet be feeling the effects of one major set of printing has nothing to do with a subjectivity or preference

---

Except it does when it subjective and does show preference. If did not show bias you would not have to use the word Biden, so by implication you’re implying it’s still Trump’s policies causing it.

quote:

---

That comment isn't even a partisan statement, as both Biden and Trump's inflation are accounted for.

---

It is as you imply by using the word Biden and speculating we may not have seen Biden’s yet.

quote:

---

There is no claim one is better or worse or any subjective/partisan assessment involved.

---

If you can’t see you did in fact demonstrate a clear bias you should probably think about that a little bit. You didn’t claim one was worse, just that we may not have seen the other yet which quite clearly demonstrates your bias that you believe Trump (or another president if you’re going to try and claim inflation takes more than 8 years to manifest) is the cause.

Again, you used the word Biden, if you had no bias you wouldn’t have used it.

quote:

---

Saying it lags 4 years is both incorrect and subjective.

---

How is it subjective?

quote:

---

Except it does when it subjective and does show preference

---

It does not

quote:

---

. If did not show bias you would not have to use the word Biden, so by implication you’re implying it’s still Trump’s policies causing it.

---

This is literally not logic

Again, you had the need to derail this thread so hard you posted something from another discussion without context.

Now you're doubling down on that mis-stating the conversation from the other thread.

Just for record purposes, the digression from the other thread:

Rog:

quote:

---

tariffs are inflationary.

I dont understand why thats so hard for some here.

---

mikeytig:

quote:

---

How was inflation at the end of Trumps term?

---

SFP:

quote:

---

Inflation lags.

We may not even be feeling Biden's inflation yet.

---

Biden was referenced as nothing more than a temporal variable. There was no partisanship, and, in fact, bringing up Biden in response to Trump could only be argued to be a pro-Trump, anti-Biden suggestion regardless. But whataboutism was not the substance of the comment, only the temporal variable of when we feel each set of printing.

quote:

---

It is as you imply by using the word Biden and speculating we may not have seen Biden’s yet.

---

No, this makes no sense.

Biden was only referenced as a temporal marker. If you want my subjective stances, I was against the printing by Trump and Biden.

quote:

---

which quite clearly demonstrates your bias that you believe Trump (or another president if you’re going to try and claim inflation takes more than 8 years to manifest) is the cause.

---

He was the cause of inflation. This is a fact.

The only issue is the temporal variable, and when that inflation was felt.

No bias involved.

quote:

---

How is it subjective?

---

Lord… when you imply that we may not have seen Biden’s inflation yet you are subjectively stating an opinion.

Subjective most commonly means based on the personal perspective or preferences of a person—the subject who’s observing something.

Definition by the way. You asserted your opinion about it which is…..subjective. Hope that cleared that up for you.

Nice try btw on dancing around.

quote:

---

There was no partisanship, and, in fact, bringing up Biden in response to Trump could only be argued to be a pro-Trump, anti-Biden suggestion regardless.

---

Which would be demonstrating a bias. Kind of funny you even argued it does while saying it doesn’t.

We all have them, you simply can’t recognize your own apparently.

quote:

---

This is why we have laws covering libel, slander and fraud.

If they’re a candidate in a large enough election where memes and deep fakes are made, they have the resources to file suit.

---

Current slander laws make it nearly impossible to sue someone for slander once you are a public figure.

Trump has bemoaned this issue multiple times because people just make up things about him and he cant sue them for it.

what part of the 1st amendment can you not read