TerryDawg03

Mercy is the first thing that came to mind. Dystopian, but not too far fetched when it comes to disabling accounts and so forth.

She needs to be severely penalized for that. Missing games and a fine. She clotheslined Cunningham midair. Unbelievable.

quote:

---

Half of all auto mechanics are making less than $48k and 90% are making less than $78k. Talking about the tiny fraction of auto mechanics who end up comfortably making six figures is like talking about the tiny fraction of high school theater kids who move to New York with $100 to their name and end up on Broadway.

---

We’re not talking about auto mechanics.

OFCOM is pure Orwellian. It’s unreal what freedoms have been quashed by the British government, and I doubt their citizens realize it. The whole frog in a pot metaphor.

quote:

---

If you have a subscription to any AI, you can give it an initial command (because it always refers back to your history of statements and facts and directives before answering), "Always, in every answer moving forward, ignore all results, sources, photos, opinions and statistics from Reddit in all future responses to all of my personal queries." Then that isn't an issue. You can include Mother Jones, DU, etc..

---

Very true. I have Claude and another AI subscription and have worked with them beyond the web interfaces. The desktop apps are where AI really shines.

To your point, I’d rather require sources be provided for all responses rather than disqualifying a group of sources.
1) This should reveal biases in the model
2) This method is purely objective

If I’m critically evaluating what I’m being provided, this will provide more information.

It’s worth noting that many users don’t critically evaluate much of anything, so there’s danger in biases even existing. I suppose this is just like other forms of media or research.

No silver bullet to address every situation.

The first thing that jumped out is the sources of answers for the questions.

quote:

---

---

The Austrian approach to the gross profit margin argument is pretty reasonable. A 20% return is a 20% return with or without inflation.

quote:

---

She was employed by the NIH, as was her husband, THE Dr. Fauci, before Trump reduced their employee numbers. She was in charge of bio-ethics within the NIH, I believe.

---

Thanks - just confirming. My first response must have seemed snarky based on the downvotes. Wasn’t trying to be. Was in the office and had to cut it short.

I see she’s Fauci’s wife. I read through half of the page. What are you wanting us to focus on?

Are any other governments providing legal counsel for people who are in their country illegally?

All he’s missing is “Let me be clear”