- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Elon: DOGE probably won’t find $2 trillion in federal budget cuts
Posted on 1/9/25 at 8:57 am to Vacherie Saint
Posted on 1/9/25 at 8:57 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
Not everything is about you.
Then stop derailing the thread. Desantis has nothing to do with this thread.
Posted on 1/9/25 at 8:58 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
No, I said his strategy was poor and I was proven right.
You can't applaud Thomas Masses and Chip Roy right now on one hand and bemoan Matt Gaetz on the other. That would be hypocritical.
Posted on 1/9/25 at 8:58 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Somewhere in the $1.7T discretionary spending
That's convenient for you.
This post was edited on 1/9/25 at 9:33 am
Posted on 1/9/25 at 8:59 am to GumboPot
quote:
You can't applaud Thomas Masses and Chip Roy right now on one hand and bemoan Matt Gaetz on the other.
Thomas Massie and Chip Roy were literally fighting the guy Gaetz got in as SOH
So yes, yes I can.
Posted on 1/9/25 at 9:00 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Thomas Massie and Chip Roy were literally fighting the guy Gaetz got in as SOH
But they are on the same page in terms of spending which seems to be what you support.
Posted on 1/9/25 at 9:01 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
And yet, people still identify MAGA/AF as "small government" and celebrated DOGE like it was going to fix our debt/deficit issues.
You do realize those 2 arguments don't jive, right?
You're in here celebrating how there won't be as much savings while simultaneously trying to pretend that you, and not the people who want $2t cut, are the real small government conservative.
If you were half as smart as you think you are, your posts wouldn't be riddled with embarrassing logical inconsistencies. Like all the other simpletons, you think only you can dictate which policies are "small government."
Posted on 1/9/25 at 9:04 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Not legally
Why are we legally obligated to employ needless workers?
Posted on 1/9/25 at 9:05 am to GumboPot
quote:
But they are on the same page in terms of spending
You wouldn't know that from the results of his strategy and that's the whole point.
Again, I criticized his strategy and said that it would do nothing positive and possibly negative. That was proven correct. The person he got in place ended up having the same fights as the person who was replaced... I believe spending even more and sending even more to Ukraine. That replacement also got zero appropriations bills in front of Congress.
Explain to me how the strategy was effective with those results
This post was edited on 1/9/25 at 9:06 am
Posted on 1/9/25 at 9:05 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:Trump already took everything off the blue ring off the table. The brown ring isn’t optional. That only leaves the teal ring, but it’s only $1.7 Trillion. The odds of cutting DoD and discretionary by more than 50% is… zero.
Wont' come close to $2T. Probably won't come close to $1T.
>
People don’t want to hear it. But the blue ring has to be cut. Even if it is “your money”. You ain’t getting it back.
This post was edited on 1/9/25 at 9:07 am
Posted on 1/9/25 at 9:08 am to keks tadpole
quote:You including SS and medicare?
Prorate the balance of the cut to $2T across the board.
Posted on 1/9/25 at 9:08 am to TenWheelsForJesus
quote:
, you're here to attack MAGA for believing that DOGE will eliminate $2t, but in the same breath, you also say they are not for small government.
The hypocrisy of what they say and what they do when action actually has to be taken is the larger point, yes.
quote:
trying to pretend that you, and not the people who want $2t cut,
They never wanted that money cut just like MAGA never wanted the money cut either.
This is the beauty of "populism". Say whatever the people want like it's Middle School, school council and you're promising a free vending machine in the lunch room, without any ability to do it or sincerity in actually wanting it.
Posted on 1/9/25 at 9:09 am to wackatimesthree
quote:
Why are we legally obligated to employ needless workers?
There are actually laws creating civil service protection for federal workers, or a lot of federal workers not 100%, and other regulatory laws like the APA that have to be followed. You can't just wave a pen and say I'm firing all these people.
Posted on 1/9/25 at 9:11 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Explain to me how the strategy was effective with those results
To be honest I think vacating McCarthy's seat was personal retribution for Matt Gaetz because of the way McCarthy smeared Matt's friend congressman Madison Cawthorn who did not win reelection because of McCarthy.
This post was edited on 1/9/25 at 9:11 am
Posted on 1/9/25 at 9:12 am to SlowFlowPro
What was it that Rand Paul found when his office put out the 2 trillion in waste report last month? Start with that.
Posted on 1/9/25 at 9:12 am to GumboPot
quote:
To be honest I think vacating McCarthy's seat was personal for Matt Gaetz
It 100% was
Emotional thinking is not rational thinking and that is a perfect example
quote:
because of the way McCarthy smeared Matt's friend congressman Madison Cawthorn who did not win reelection because of McCarthy.
I imagine this was part of it but there was a lot more, however a lot of people don't like Gaetz because he's your typica arrogant l career politician nepo baby
Posted on 1/9/25 at 9:12 am to Y.A. Tittle
quote:This is an excellent question to be asking. Unfortunately the thing that need to be cut… people think is “their money”. Everyone wants cuts… for others, but themselves. So short of some radical shift toward personal responsibility or perception change to understand the government doesn’t have “your money”… it will take a crisis to see any real change. Sadly.
How do you get the populous onboard with the idea of cutting things if you don’t start somewhere?
Posted on 1/9/25 at 9:12 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
SlowFlowPro
quote:
Then stop derailing the thread.

Posted on 1/9/25 at 9:18 am to GumboPot
quote:”American first!”
To be honest I think vacating McCarthy's seat was personal retribution for Matt Gaetz because of the way McCarthy smeared Matt's friend congressman Madison Cawthorn who did not win reelection because of McCarthy.
Posted on 1/9/25 at 9:19 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I imagine this was part of it but there was a lot more,
Yes. The entire setup by Greenberg was probably part of it.
Popular
Back to top



2



>

