Favorite team:Alabama 
Location:Jacksonville, Florida
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:6664
Registered on:10/30/2008
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
quote:

Bbobalou


You left out Russiagate. Why?

Is this an admission that they attempted a coup d'état against a sitting president?

Doesn’t that make most of the crap you listed suspect as it demonstates left wing scum are capable of persecuting their political enemies?

Are they not behind most of this list?

I'm talking about systematic persecution.
Now they have lost their chief port as well as their oil producing province.

re: Iran is God's annointed.

Posted by RiverCityTider on 1/11/26 at 8:42 pm to
You just called God's word blasphemous.

re: Iran is God's annointed.

Posted by RiverCityTider on 1/11/26 at 8:32 pm to
quote:



“In that day there will be a highway from Egypt to Assyria. The Assyrians will go to Egypt, and the Egyptians to Assyria. The Egyptians and Assyrians will worship together.
In that day Israel will be the third, along with Egypt and Assyria, a blessing on the earth.
The Lord Almighty will bless them, saying, ‘Blessed be Egypt my people, Assyria the work of my hands, and Israel my inheritance.’”

Isaiah 19:23–25

Iran is God's annointed.

Posted by RiverCityTider on 1/11/26 at 7:27 pm
Egypt is God's people.
Israel is God's Inheritance.

It was never intended that Iran?(Persia) and Israel would kill one another.

One day they they will all worship the same God.

Do you suppose all that ties in with what we are seeing right now?
quote:

Pining for a Saban clone is going to be as destructive as pining for a Bryant clone was. I swear to God, our fan base wants a damn cult of personality, it’s like their self esteem and self image demand it.


Bama had their Bryant clone in Bobby Bowden and blew him off for a guy who had not won anything. The fans that pine for the Bryants and the Sabans and the Bowdens are the ones that have made this program great. Those who constantly call for moderating expectations lead to mediocre outcomes.
This is my idea of what faith is. Or at least how what most people see as "faith" begins.

Faith, in the most basic sense, is not a feeling or an idea you agree with in your head. It’s a response. It’s something you do. In Scripture, faith always shows up as action, even when that action is simple. When Israel was dying from snake bites in the wilderness, God didn’t ask them to understand why a bronze serpent would help. He told them to look. That was it. Looking didn’t heal them by itself. Looking was the act of trust. Life came because God attached a promise to that action. Faith was not the cure; faith was the turning toward what God provided.

Jesus later takes that exact story and applies it to Himself: “Just as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, so must the Son of Man be lifted up, that whoever believes in Him may have eternal life” (John 3:14–15). Belief here isn’t abstract agreement. It’s movement toward Him. It’s orientation. Faith is choosing to face God rather than turning away, even when you don’t fully understand what He’s doing or how it works.

That’s why faith is also relational. You don’t “have faith” in a vacuum. You trust someone. In the serpent story, the people trusted God enough to act on His word. In the gospel, faith is trust placed in Christ as a person, not just acceptance of a theory about Him. And faith always carries a promise with it. God binds Himself to the response. Look and live. Turn and be healed. Trust and receive life. Faith doesn’t force God’s hand, but God has chosen to meet faith with grace. That’s the pattern: action, relationship, and promise...working together.
quote:

The Bible says repeatedly that Christ died once for all and is now seated at the right hand of God (Col. 3:1). He is not subject to being called down and sacrificed again and again by Roman Catholic priests (imagine the audacity). Put your faith in Christ alone, not his imagined presence in a piece of bread.


But my problem is that Jesus explicitly says "this is my body..." and "Do this...". He could easily have taken the Protestant line and won the crowd back. Instead, he doubled down.

It is a difficult teaching.

Also, the Catholics and Orthodox deny that Christ is bring re crucified. They claim that they are being made present to the one sacrifice that already happened.”
I woke up at 3:01AM and this video was playing on my television.

LINK

I have been doing a deep dive back into Christianity lately and reconsidering it after putting it on the back burner for many years.

So i found it somewhat interesting and verified the authenticity of the sources today and wrote the piece above.

On the Jewish Day of Atonement (Yom Kippur), there were several rituals meant to show whether God accepted Israel’s sacrifices for sin. These rituals are described in the Talmud, which is a large collection of Jewish teachings and discussions. It was written down between about AD 200–500, but it preserves much earlier oral traditions, going back to the time of the Second Temple.

One ritual involved two goats. Lots were drawn to decide which goat was “for the Lord” (to be sacrificed) and which was the “scapegoat” (sent into the wilderness, symbolically carrying Israel’s sins away). Drawing the lot in the right hand was considered a good sign that God accepted the offering.

According to the Talmud (Yoma 39a), for about 40 years before the destruction of the Second Temple, the lot never came up in the right hand. Year after year, it always came up in the left. If the draw were random, the odds of that happening 40 times in a row are about 1 in a trillion.

There were three other signs mentioned for the same period


A crimson ribbon tied to the scapegoat, which was believed to turn white when sins were forgiven, stopped turning white.

The western lamp of the menorah, which normally stayed lit as a sign of God’s presence, kept going out.

The massive Temple doors were reported to open by themselves, which was seen as a warning sign.


All four of these changes are recorded together in Jewish sources, not Christian ones.

The Second Temple was destroyed by the Romans in AD 70. Forty years earlier puts the beginning of these signs around AD 30. Historians generally place the crucifixion of Jesus between AD 30 and 33, right in the middle of that window.

In Jewish thinking, these signs all pointed to one thing: God was no longer accepting the Temple sacrifices in the same way. In Christian theology, Jesus’ crucifixion is understood as a once-for-all sacrifice for sin, which would make animal sacrifices obsolete.

None of this proves anything by itself. But it is striking that Jewish sources themselves describe a long-term spiritual change, centered on the exact period when Christianity claims that the meaning of sacrifice fundamentally changed.

At the very least, it’s a historical puzzle worth thinking about.
quote:

MoarKilometers


Help me to become a bettter poster.
All you have to do is an analysis of star ratings vs draft picks and there is NO DOUBT that ratings Do matter.
We did and he did, because it was a lateral move. He is also the highest paid assistant in the league.
I didnt argue for abandoning the passing game and returning to game managers. Not at all.

Saban knew that many of his olines were underachieving in his last few years.

There is no reason why great oline play and a great passing game are mutually exclusive. The very notion is silly.

(Cont)

This is why the offenses with Pendry and Stoutland fronts were the most feared and ferocious in our dynasty ...despite being qb'ed by second tier quarterbacks.

You people scoffing at this are the same ones whining to "run the ball" when we are not capable of doing so.
Doesn't it all start with the oline and running game?

If our hc built that, would it not be easier to find a oc to come in and install a passing game around it?

I'll answer.

Absolutely it all starts up front. Once you get that right, everything is easier. And to neglect that and think you can x and o out of it is a fools errand.

To my knowledge no one ever offered stoutland a head coaching job at 11 million a year. I'm not sure he wouldnt have taken it.

Worst case he would double his salary.
It would have been the perfect out of the box hire.

He is the world's foremost authority on offensive line play and the running game.

It all starts up front. I would take one Stoutland for 50 of these pen headed offensive gurus getting all the head coaching jobs.

It just occured to me that you people assume i mean hire him as o line coach. No. Most certainly not. We should have hired him as head coach.
Maybe Saban's $800,000 a year consulting fee could buy three or four hours of film study and a couple of real recommendations.

If not, why not spend that money on NIL. The Sabans are doing ok financially.