
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 243 for young first time hunter, did I make a mistake?
Posted on 10/20/26 at 3:02 pm to AlxTgr
Posted on 10/20/26 at 3:02 pm to AlxTgr
The OP will be fine with the .243. But the best youth bolt rifle setup these days would be a .308/7-08/6.5 CM ported and suppressed. No noise or recoil and plenty of reach as their shooting skills improve.
Posted on 10/20/26 at 3:29 pm to 257WBY
Suppressors should be standard equipment on kids rifles.
Posted on 10/20/26 at 3:47 pm to 257WBY
Hard to argue with 7mm-08…. One of the best if not the best .308 offspring.
Posted on 10/20/26 at 4:02 pm to GREENHEAD22
He will kill a bunch of deer with that rifle with no problems at all.
Posted on 10/20/26 at 6:05 pm to DownshiftAndFloorIt
I
Use the lightest bullets you can. It's lightening.
quote:
You guys using copper bullets - what kind of results are you getting?
Use the lightest bullets you can. It's lightening.
Posted on 10/20/26 at 6:49 pm to GREENHEAD22
Deer Hunting with a .243 on a cold frosty morning is one of my fondest boy hood memories I can recall.
Excellent choice of caliber
Excellent choice of caliber
Posted on 10/21/26 at 1:49 am to AlxTgr
quote:
(Zeroed at 100 Yards)
Everyone please stop doing this regardless of caliber
Unless of course you are a tight woods hunter.
But if you see any sort of distance, sight in for a 3-4 inch arc. Make your life easier man.
Posted on 10/21/26 at 5:06 am to GREENHEAD22
One of the dumbest decisions I ever made was trading a pre’64 Model 70 .243 for a Weatherby .270 with some boot money.
I hated that .270 and still wish I had that .243 back. I killed maybe 50 deer with it back in the early 80’s.
The folly of youth!
For the record, I use a .308 these days but have been toying with picking up another .243.
I hated that .270 and still wish I had that .243 back. I killed maybe 50 deer with it back in the early 80’s.
The folly of youth!
For the record, I use a .308 these days but have been toying with picking up another .243.
This post was edited on 10/21/26 at 5:08 am
Posted on 10/21/26 at 7:10 am to X123F45
quote:It's just a reference point for comparison.
Everyone please stop doing thi
Posted on 10/21/26 at 7:46 am to bbvdd
quote:
I've since started reloading and I've yet to find a load with them that give the accuracy that those boxes gave me.
Change your powder.
Posted on 10/21/26 at 10:38 am to GREENHEAD22
All 4 of my kids killed their first deer with a 243. Shot placement is king!!
Posted on 10/21/26 at 12:06 pm to saintsfan1977
quote:
Change your powder.
I've used a couple of different but need to try with others.
The 8208x is suppose to be the best but I've not had luck with it.
Sitting depth may all be an issue with it as well. Just need to spend more time.
Posted on 10/21/26 at 12:42 pm to GREENHEAD22
A great old school deer round, and yes it will keeeel.
Posted on 10/21/26 at 3:05 pm to X123F45
quote:
But if you see any sort of distance, sight in for a 3-4 inch arc.
You talking Maximum Point Blank Range sighting?
Yeah, best way to go.
Posted on 10/21/26 at 8:05 pm to GREENHEAD22
If you didn’t want him to kill something, you should have gotten him a 6.5 Creedmore. It’s the better choice to only wound.
This post was edited on 10/21/26 at 8:06 pm
Posted on 10/21/26 at 10:49 pm to UtahCajun
quote:
You talking Maximum Point Blank Range sighting?
Yeah, best way to go.
I swear to God I didn't know this was a thing, but yes that is exactly what I mean!
Dialed in, it takes the guess work out of shots typically out to your maximum realistic distance.
Posted on 10/22/26 at 8:56 am to GREENHEAD22
I am about to share an unpopular opinion, but here goes:
I guided high fence for several years, was in a club for many years with 243 lovers, and was there to witness the shite show with my 2 young cousins starting off with 243. I loath the cartridge for anyone other than an experienced adult. There isn't much room for error with the damn thing. Most of the bullets for them expand much too rapidly or just break apart inside of 100 yds. If they don't exit you're not getting any blood due to the incredibly small entry hole. What comes next is a lost or incredibly hard to find animal if you don't see it go down or if you don't get a good idea of which way it ran. I've seen this play out dozens of times. You have to remember the 243 was invented as a varmint cartridge that could kill a deer at the hands of a skilled fur shooter if one popped up. It doesn't happen every time and people kill a lot of deer with them, but there's a chance it doesn't work or makes life hard when there are better options that would make it not as hard. Another thing 243 people love to do is claim they just missed or made a bad shot when they in fact didn't. When you're shooting shite fenced in you can stumble across them a few days later when the buzzards show up. On my old club we have found several then the shooter claimed he missed but didn't feel like going looking because he didn't have any blood.
This is my lived experience of almost 40 years of deer hunting. Personally shot over 150 and I've been around hundreds more. I won't shoot less than a 6.5 mm cartridge and feel confident. I much rather see a kid use a 30-30 than 243 or 223 or anything similar. I started my girls on the 3030 and then moved into a 308 shooting 130 grain barnes. 308 with the 130 Barnes has the same penetration 150 grain projectiles, but with equal to a 6.5 CM or 708 with 140gr bullets. It kills like freaking lightning.
If you insist on 6mm and smaller cartridges for deer, use Barnes, Partitions, or something bonded besides Federal fusions as they are extremely soft. They tend to pancake inside of 100 yards. I've seen the 180 grainers not make it out of fallow deer at 90 yards. It wasn't really a problem because 180 grain bullet out of a 30-06 has a lot of power and creates a large wound channel because of the 30 cal bullet. They would all fall within sight.
Lastly, I don't give a damn what cartridges you're shooting. If you know your shots are going to be less than 125 yds and you're hunting in thick terrain, don't use thin jacketed tipped cup and core lead bullets like ELDX, SST, Ballistic Tip/Ballistic Silver tip, Corelokt Tipped, Berger, and similar. They can and do go to absolute crumbles on impact. Sometimes they get in the cavity enough to kill the deer and allow you to recover it without too much trouble. Sometimes they just wound the deer and it either lives or dies days or weeks later due to infection. Does it happen every time no, of course not. Get your sample size up and you will see it happen eventually. Been there, done that, lived it. In those conditions Barnes, tougher bonded, and partitions are the only fails safe options. All of that high BC shite is for target shooting. It is meaningless inside of 400 yds.
My buddy who has a ranch in OK refers to ELDX bullets as "dog callers" because there's about a 50/50 chance that he's going to have to call the local dog handler every time he hears family or a client shoot when using them. They switched all their ammo to Federal Terminal Ascent. They have a lead nose that is bonded to the jacket followed by a solid copper base. I have seen his wife put big arse Midwest deer on her arse with a 6.5 CM with those and they exit. They are amazing bullets.
I guided high fence for several years, was in a club for many years with 243 lovers, and was there to witness the shite show with my 2 young cousins starting off with 243. I loath the cartridge for anyone other than an experienced adult. There isn't much room for error with the damn thing. Most of the bullets for them expand much too rapidly or just break apart inside of 100 yds. If they don't exit you're not getting any blood due to the incredibly small entry hole. What comes next is a lost or incredibly hard to find animal if you don't see it go down or if you don't get a good idea of which way it ran. I've seen this play out dozens of times. You have to remember the 243 was invented as a varmint cartridge that could kill a deer at the hands of a skilled fur shooter if one popped up. It doesn't happen every time and people kill a lot of deer with them, but there's a chance it doesn't work or makes life hard when there are better options that would make it not as hard. Another thing 243 people love to do is claim they just missed or made a bad shot when they in fact didn't. When you're shooting shite fenced in you can stumble across them a few days later when the buzzards show up. On my old club we have found several then the shooter claimed he missed but didn't feel like going looking because he didn't have any blood.
This is my lived experience of almost 40 years of deer hunting. Personally shot over 150 and I've been around hundreds more. I won't shoot less than a 6.5 mm cartridge and feel confident. I much rather see a kid use a 30-30 than 243 or 223 or anything similar. I started my girls on the 3030 and then moved into a 308 shooting 130 grain barnes. 308 with the 130 Barnes has the same penetration 150 grain projectiles, but with equal to a 6.5 CM or 708 with 140gr bullets. It kills like freaking lightning.
If you insist on 6mm and smaller cartridges for deer, use Barnes, Partitions, or something bonded besides Federal fusions as they are extremely soft. They tend to pancake inside of 100 yards. I've seen the 180 grainers not make it out of fallow deer at 90 yards. It wasn't really a problem because 180 grain bullet out of a 30-06 has a lot of power and creates a large wound channel because of the 30 cal bullet. They would all fall within sight.
Lastly, I don't give a damn what cartridges you're shooting. If you know your shots are going to be less than 125 yds and you're hunting in thick terrain, don't use thin jacketed tipped cup and core lead bullets like ELDX, SST, Ballistic Tip/Ballistic Silver tip, Corelokt Tipped, Berger, and similar. They can and do go to absolute crumbles on impact. Sometimes they get in the cavity enough to kill the deer and allow you to recover it without too much trouble. Sometimes they just wound the deer and it either lives or dies days or weeks later due to infection. Does it happen every time no, of course not. Get your sample size up and you will see it happen eventually. Been there, done that, lived it. In those conditions Barnes, tougher bonded, and partitions are the only fails safe options. All of that high BC shite is for target shooting. It is meaningless inside of 400 yds.
My buddy who has a ranch in OK refers to ELDX bullets as "dog callers" because there's about a 50/50 chance that he's going to have to call the local dog handler every time he hears family or a client shoot when using them. They switched all their ammo to Federal Terminal Ascent. They have a lead nose that is bonded to the jacket followed by a solid copper base. I have seen his wife put big arse Midwest deer on her arse with a 6.5 CM with those and they exit. They are amazing bullets.
Posted on 10/22/26 at 10:13 pm to GREENHEAD22
I killed my first 20+ deer with one and both of my sons have killed all of their deer with .243s. I think it’s a great choice for young hunters and ladies
Posted on 10/23/26 at 8:21 pm to GREENHEAD22
My dad has had a .243 for 50 years and never hunted with anything else. Killed a ton of deer

Popular
Back to top


2







