- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
WSJ: new federal limits on graduate school loans are already reducing MBA costs
Posted on 5/17/26 at 10:30 pm
Posted on 5/17/26 at 10:30 pm
quote:
LINK
The press is reporting that MBA programs are slashing tuition, though they’re focusing on the hole and not the donut: Colleges are at long last under pressure to cut prices because last year’s tax bill limits federal loans for graduate students.
The University of California, Irvine, this month said it will reduce tuition for its MBA program by $30,000 to $99,000. “The Merage Flex MBA’s new tuition falls below the federal loan cap of $100,000, removing a critical financial barrier for working professionals across Southern California and beyond,” the university said. It boasted that its “MBA is priced within reach of government loan limits—making a world-class degree not just aspirational, but truly attainable.”
You have to love how the university spins virtue out of necessity. The GOP tax bill last year capped the aggregate federal debt that graduate students can take out at $100,000, and $200,000 for professional degrees like law and medicine. Previously, grad students could borrow an unlimited amount.
film and video studies where students who take on federal loans leave with $168,000 in debt on average but earn just $47,000.”
Struggling borrowers would then enroll in the Obama and Biden loan forgiveness plan in which the feds wrote off one-third of debt. Graduate programs became cash cows for universities, which raised prices to take advantage of the open spigot of federal loans.
A 2023 study in the National Bureau of Economic Research found that the 2006 law that uncapped federal borrowing for graduate programs didn’t improve access or degree attainment. Colleges merely raised tuition to capture more federal loans. “Sticker prices went up approximately dollar for dollar with increases in federal loans,” the economists found.
The new loan cap is increasing pressure on universities to cut prices and offer more financial aid. While graduate students can still take out private loans to pay for their degrees, they carry higher interests rates and come with stricter underwriting. Unlike federal loans, borrowers can’t get them discharged via special repayment programs.
All of this reinforces that universities respond to government incentives like any business. For too long those incentives encouraged colleges to raise prices and bury students in debt. One of the 2025 tax bill’s overlooked benefits is that it will impose a modicum of financial discipline in higher ed.
There were a handful of posters on here (grad students and parents of grad students) who were complaining about the new loan cap.
Eager to see their thoughts
Posted on 5/17/26 at 10:35 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Works the same way for food stamps.
Posted on 5/17/26 at 10:54 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
Previously, grad students could borrow an unlimited amount.
While it’s interesting to see schools already responding to the caps, the bolded statement is false-ish. The previous cap for graduate students was $138,500 which included all undergrad borrowing as well. The new cap of 100,000 is Graduate borrowing only.
The “unlimited” notion comes from Grad PLUS loans that were credit-based loans (not everyone qualified) and had no lifetime cap. However, those are not related to the new caps whatsoever.
That being said, GRAD Plus is officially dead starting this year, so it’ll be interesting to see if more programs have downward tuition adjustments.
Posted on 5/17/26 at 11:05 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
frick UC Irvine. I still haven’t forgotten that hidden ball bs they pulled on us
Posted on 5/17/26 at 11:09 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Anything the government gets involved in causes prices to soar. Once they’re gone, prices lower.
Posted on 5/17/26 at 11:31 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
There were a handful of posters on here (grad students and parents of grad students) who were complaining about the new loan cap.
Eager to see their thoughts
They won't show up.
Posted on 5/18/26 at 12:06 am to OysterPoBoy
quote:
Works the same way for food stamps.
My thoughts exactly. The local HEB has tons of coupons on cokes, chips, and candy… or just “new low price, same great taste” across the board.
Fam, we were funding a bunch of people to get fat on our dollars for years and everyone was jacking the prices up because they could.
Posted on 5/18/26 at 12:36 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
Get rid of all loans and grants and college will be $1,500 per semester. The only thing that keeps it going up is free money they give out.
Posted on 5/18/26 at 4:33 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
It will be interesting to see the long-term effects on medical schools. Most of my classmates left with six figures of debt. I think the average medical school debt is somewhere above 200 K presently, but many are much higher than that, 300 to 400 K.
While I am overall a proponent of this change for the reasons/effects stated in the OP, I am a bit concerned about how this might long-term affect doctors going to rural areas where they are most needed. More than a doctor shortage we have a distribution problem. Kids from rural areas are more likely to go back to rural areas after residency, and these kids in general are going to be less affluent than those coming from the cities. While there does exist some incentives to practice in rural areas, including loan repayment credits, I do not think they are strong enough.
While I am overall a proponent of this change for the reasons/effects stated in the OP, I am a bit concerned about how this might long-term affect doctors going to rural areas where they are most needed. More than a doctor shortage we have a distribution problem. Kids from rural areas are more likely to go back to rural areas after residency, and these kids in general are going to be less affluent than those coming from the cities. While there does exist some incentives to practice in rural areas, including loan repayment credits, I do not think they are strong enough.
This post was edited on 5/18/26 at 4:37 am
Posted on 5/18/26 at 5:14 am to cubsfan5150
quote:
Anything the government gets involved in causes prices to soar. Once they’re gone, prices lower.
We should end all subsidies immediately.
Posted on 5/18/26 at 5:39 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
Most traditional MBAs have generally not been reduced (yet). It's the flex/4+1, online and hyper-specialized degrees mostly now.
This post was edited on 5/18/26 at 5:41 am
Posted on 5/18/26 at 7:30 am to OysterPoBoy
quote:
Works the same way for food stamps.
So you're saying with food stamps limits, Walmart would lower grocery prices?
Isn't Walmart the largest financial recipient of federal snap $s?
Posted on 5/18/26 at 7:38 am to tigerfan 64
quote:
So you're saying with food stamps limits, Walmart would lower grocery prices?
Anecdotal but there are restrictions on SNAP purchases in my area and there have been quite a few "sales" recently on soft drinks, chips and other junk food.
Posted on 5/18/26 at 7:46 am to Aubie Spr96
That is draconian, but would in fact, lower prices.
No one has taken more advantage of subsidies than higher ed, and I am including welfare in that statement.
No one has taken more advantage of subsidies than higher ed, and I am including welfare in that statement.
Posted on 5/18/26 at 7:48 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
Kudos and thanks to LSUS... I got my master's degree for about 13k
Posted on 5/18/26 at 9:46 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
already reducing MBA costs
You mean the government getting involved actually made something WORSE? I'm shocked.
Posted on 5/18/26 at 9:56 am to cwil177
quote:
It will be interesting to see the long-term effects on medical schools. Most of my classmates left with six figures of debt. I think the average medical school debt is somewhere above 200 K presently, but many are much higher than that, 300 to 400 K.
While I am overall a proponent of this change for the reasons/effects stated in the OP, I am a bit concerned about how this might long-term affect doctors going to rural areas where they are most needed. More than a doctor shortage we have a distribution problem. Kids from rural areas are more likely to go back to rural areas after residency, and these kids in general are going to be less affluent than those coming from the cities. While there does exist some incentives to practice in rural areas, including loan repayment credits, I do not think they are strong enough.
They should considering added a loan forgiveness program like they do for Public Sector workers. Pay on the loan for 10 years as long as you work in that sector, in this case it would be a doctor in a rural area, and then your loan is forgiven after that amount.
Popular
Back to top

11













