Started By
Message

re: USA has lost its last two major wars

Posted on 8/17/21 at 8:32 am to
Posted by scott8811
Ratchet City, LA
Member since Oct 2014
11397 posts
Posted on 8/17/21 at 8:32 am to
Kinda feels like a war and an occupation are 2 different animals
Posted by Damone
FoCo
Member since Aug 2016
32966 posts
Posted on 8/17/21 at 8:34 am to
quote:

Became the dictatorship of earth and we wouldn’t have all the uprisings and wars that’s happened since WW2

You realize the CIA was the root cause of most of the uprisings and wars since WW2, right?
Posted by jdd48
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2012
22127 posts
Posted on 8/17/21 at 8:36 am to
quote:

We are who they thought we were. This isn’t the 40s. We’re becoming the JV team



We've handcuffed ourselves with insane rules of engagement. You can't fire a single shot these days without months long inquiries and endless paperwork. Meanwhile, the enemy has no such rules and is resorting to guerilla tactics.
This post was edited on 8/17/21 at 8:38 am
Posted by northshorebamaman
Cochise County AZ
Member since Jul 2009
35528 posts
Posted on 8/17/21 at 8:52 am to
quote:


Kinda feels like a war and an occupation are 2 different animals
Yep. We fought a war against the military of Ba'athist controlled Iraq and kicked the shite out of them in a couple weeks. I saw it happen. I was there.

Then we proceeded to "occupy" them for a fricking decade and couldn't stop tripping over our own dicks. Should be a lesson there somewhere.

The military did what it was designed to do- defeat a conventional army on a battlefield. It fricked up the "nation building" part which I would argue should never have been its role in the first place. Brenner screwed the pooch almost from day one when he disbanded the Iraq army.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
261680 posts
Posted on 8/17/21 at 8:53 am to
quote:

Kinda feels like a war and an occupation are 2 different animals


With occupation the doesn't ends, until you lose.

Posted by Champagne
Already Conquered USA.
Member since Oct 2007
48509 posts
Posted on 8/17/21 at 8:56 am to
quote:

We were not even fighting in Afghanistan any more. The last American KIA in Afghanistan was February of last year. we’d moved on to advisory and peacekeeping. Last year the cost of being in Afghanistan made up a whopping 1% of the national budget.

The truth is the Afghan Army for the past several years had shouldered the majority of the fighting and the last 5-6 years virtually all the fighting on the ground. Look at the casualty rates year by year:
American casualties by month and year

Research by Brown University estimates losses in the Afghan security forces at 69,000

The last time the US monthly casualty total was even in double digits was June 2014 when 13 servicemen died.

So the truth of Afghanistan was is has not been a “forever war” for the US. The Afghan Army was doing the fighting and were waging the type of war we trained them to fight, namely a combined arms land/air war where ground units could and did rely on air support for both combat and logistics needs. When Biden pulled eveyone out he also took the civilian contractors who maintained the Afgan air assets. Suddenly the Afghan army that has been fighting for years found it’s main ally was abandoning them and worse yet crippling their air assets. This is why the Afghan army collapsed in sudden fashion.


Excellent insight! Thank you.

Let me add a tid-bit of historical military history fact, just as a point of interest. I refer everyone to the North Vietnamese Army Offensive of Spring, 1972, the Year of the Rat. By 1972, the USA had greatly reduced its military footprint in Vietnam. The South Vietnamese Army was assigned to task to defend their country, and they were trained like the A-ghan forces, to do so backed by US air support assets from the USAF and USN.

In sum, the South Vietnamese Army was greatly challenged by this North Vietnamese Army offensive, but, KICKED NVA-arse. The Communist military forces were so thoroughly depleted by this defeat that it took them another three years to build up enough strength to launch another offensive - the 1975 offensive that ended the war.

IF the USA had not pulled the air support assets from A-ghan, the A-ghan Army probably would have defeated the Taliban in recent days. The decision to end all US air support operations IS the decisive factor in this military defeat of this US ally.
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
37583 posts
Posted on 8/17/21 at 8:58 am to
So this is literally just like Vietnam then.
This post was edited on 8/17/21 at 8:59 am
Posted by Ronaldo Burgundiaz
NWA
Member since Jan 2012
6566 posts
Posted on 8/17/21 at 9:03 am to
We have lost a lot more than two wars recently.



Posted by VADawg
Wherever
Member since Nov 2011
45067 posts
Posted on 8/17/21 at 9:08 am to
quote:

We are who they thought we were. This isn’t the 40s. We’re becoming the JV team


To win a war, you must break the other side's will to fight by any means necessary, such as dropping the bombs on Japan. We refused to do that.
Posted by Midtiger farm
Member since Nov 2014
5061 posts
Posted on 8/17/21 at 9:10 am to
If the US doesn't allow the French to go back in to Vietnam after WWII, Vietnam is a democracy within 10 years and the war never happens
Posted by Kashmir
Member since Dec 2014
7824 posts
Posted on 8/17/21 at 9:13 am to
usa is undefeated in major wars. usa has a losing record in guerrilla conflicts.
Posted by TigerCoon
Member since Nov 2005
18895 posts
Posted on 8/17/21 at 9:15 am to
we won the war. we lost the peace.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
39670 posts
Posted on 8/17/21 at 9:20 am to
We didn't lose either of those wars. We won easily. However, we were unable to build a democratic coalition that could withstand the religious fanatics. That's not losing a war, dipshit.
Posted by Tigeralum2008
Yankees Fan
Member since Apr 2012
17151 posts
Posted on 8/17/21 at 9:22 am to
quote:

If the US doesn't allow the French to go back in to Vietnam after WWII, Vietnam is a democracy within 10 years and the war never happens



It really is amazing to me how numerous post WWI and WWII decisions have caused so many calamitous effects on world security nearly a century later

The Middle East Borders
India-Pakistan
China-Taiwan
Vietnam
Korea
Africa post colonialism
Posted by northshorebamaman
Cochise County AZ
Member since Jul 2009
35528 posts
Posted on 8/17/21 at 9:26 am to
quote:

It really is amazing to me how numerous post WWI and WWII decisions have caused so many calamitous effects on world security nearly a century later

The Middle East Borders
India-Pakistan
China-Taiwan
Vietnam
Korea
Africa post colonialism
fricking Gavrilo Princip
Posted by Havoc
Member since Nov 2015
28622 posts
Posted on 8/17/21 at 9:27 am to
quote:

A 21st century US army will only ever be asked to nation build or peace keep. We shouldn’t be doing any of those things ever again.

I agree in principle, but the reality is when we go in and fight a war, and win, there is a vacuum that will be left behind.

We can pull all troops home and just say “come what May” and risk the same or even worse people taking power, or try to make it better or at least stable. I don’t see any other plausible way, do you?
Posted by Kansas City King
Columbia, MO
Member since Oct 2020
2316 posts
Posted on 8/17/21 at 9:33 am to
You can't win a war when the rules of engagement are "Don't shoot them unless they shoot at you first" especially when you are "fighting" on their turf. Anybody could be an enemy and they can position themselves anywhere they want, can't shoot em. You won't know until the lead is flying or they already have assault rifles drawn.
This post was edited on 8/17/21 at 9:36 am
Posted by Champagne
Already Conquered USA.
Member since Oct 2007
48509 posts
Posted on 8/17/21 at 10:27 am to
quote:

So this is literally just like Vietnam then.


The parallel to what happened in Vietnam is very close, yes, because by 1975, the USA had removed all military support and air support to South Vietnam.

In 1975, the South Vietnamese Army fought very hard, but, North Vietnam had amassed too much military power on the ground to be denied victory.

The USA, once again, fails to learn anything from its own Military History.

This is not new. In World War One, the US Army and USMC trained its infantry in linear infantry tactics in which the infantry Company would line up and advance the enemy front line. These linear infantry tactics were discredited by the year 1865, but, the US military system hadn't learned this lesson, not even by the year 1918.

Go figure! The USA is just stupid, when it comes to too many very important things that nation-states should learn to do well.





Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
37583 posts
Posted on 8/17/21 at 10:28 am to
quote:

Go figure! The USA is just stupid, when it comes to too many very important things that nation-states should learn to do well.


We were the only ones not doing well
In WWI tactics.
Posted by USMCTIGER1970
BATON ROUGE
Member since Mar 2017
2371 posts
Posted on 8/17/21 at 10:38 am to
Then GTFO!! and go live with the so called winner you ungrateful cuck!!
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram