There will be hearings, politicians will grandstand, and Pfizer will quietly contribute more money to their campaign funds and it will disappear with Congress doing absolutely nothing.

So in other words, Congress as usual.

This post was edited on 5/4/22 at 9:24 am

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by Hulkklogan

Baton Rouge, LA

Member since Oct 2010

43308 posts

Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:24 am to stout

quote:
Pfizer knew the vaccine harmed the fetus in pregnant women

That's disingenuous a description as I've seen. The pic just below says they don't know if it affects pregnant women but couldn't rule it out.

That alone makes me skeptical of all of those snippets.

It is still horrible if they didn't test further and urged pregnant women to get vaccinated.

This post was edited on 5/4/22 at 9:27 am

3 ...

Report Post

Posted by sgallo3

Dorne

Member since Sep 2008

24747 posts

Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:25 am to stout

quote:
They vaxxed 270 pregnant women.

There is no feedback on 238, but of the other 32 there was only one live birth.

The no feedback is flawed terminology. The other 238 were ongoing pregnancies at the time of the study

quote:
Miscarriage is the spontaneous loss of a pregnancy before the 20th week. About 10 to 20 percent of known pregnancies end in miscarriage.

So 31 out of 270 puts us on the lower end of that 10 to 20 percent range.

This post was edited on 5/4/22 at 9:32 am

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by Abstract Queso Dip

Member since Mar 2021

5878 posts

Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:25 am to stout

I know no one that had vaccine complications. I know of a few either that died or had long term Covid problems.

Anecdotal I know. I'm still a proud shareholder and Pfizer mutant though. X-Men 4 life

This post was edited on 5/4/22 at 9:26 am

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by Cosmo

glassman's guest house

Member since Oct 2003

120439 posts

Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:26 am to Scruffy

quote:
The data appears to admit that there is either a definite impact or they have no idea.

More likely they have no idea which is common for a lot of drugs

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by Bottom9

Arsenal Til I Die

Member since Jul 2010

21821 posts

Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:27 am to whiskey over ice

US Congressmen who has invested in Pfizer and the amounts they invested:

LINK

Sensenbrenner, Jim - Republican $1,018,814 - $5,018,813 House

Gianforte, Greg - Republican $797,130 House

Upton, Fred - Republican $165,003 - $400,000 House

Schrader, Kurt - Democrat $100,001 - $250,000 House

Cook, Paul - Republican $100,001 - $250,000 House

Lawson, Al - Democrat $45,003 - $150,000 House

Dingell, Debbie - Democrat $50,001 - $100,000 House

Roe, Phil - Republican $91,446 House

Capito, Shelley Moore - Republican $16,002 - $65,000 Senate

Kennedy, Joe III - Democrat $16,002 - $65,000 House

Holding, George - Republican $15,001 - $50,000 House

Kelly, Mike - Republican $15,001 - $50,000 House

Gottheimer, Josh - Democrat $15,001 - $50,000 House

Rosen, Jacky - Democrat $15,001 - $50,000 Senate

Wyden, Ron - Democrat $15,001 - $50,000 Senate

Blumenauer, Earl - Democrat $15,001 - $50,000 House

Peters, Gary - Democrat $15,001 - $50,000 Senate

Conaway, Mike - Republican $15,001 - $50,000 House

Sires, Albio - Democrat $15,001 - $50,000 House

Whitehouse, Sheldon - Democrat $15,001 - $50,000 Senate

Norman, Ralph - Republican $15,001 - $50,000 House

Hill, French - Republican $15,001 - $50,000 House

Yarmuth, John - Democrat $1,001 - $15,000 House

Wittman, Rob - Republican $1,001 - $15,000 House

Carper, Tom - Democrat $1,001 - $15,000 Senate

Burgess, Michael - Republican $1,001 - $15,000 House

Scott, Bobby - Democrat $1,001 - $15,000 House

Frankel, Lois - Democrat $1,001 - $15,000 House

Suozzi, Tom - Democrat $1,001 - $15,000 House

Rutherford, John - Republican $1,001 - $15,000 House

Marshall, Roger - Republican $1,001 - $15,000 House

Evans, Dwight - Democrat $1,001 - $15,000 House

Gibbs, Bob - Republican $1,001 - $15,000 House

Barr, Andy - Republican $1,001 - $15,000 House

Williams, Roger - Republican $1,001 - $15,000 House

Perdue, David - Republican $0 - $1,000 Senate

Collins, Susan M - Republican $0 - $1,000 Senate

This post was edited on 5/4/22 at 9:29 am

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by Scruffy

Kansas City

Member since Jul 2011

72196 posts

Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:27 am to Hulkklogan

quote:
That's disingenuous a description as I've seen. The pic just below says they don't know if it affects pregnant women but couldn't rule it out.

It states that it was not recommended in pregnancy or with breastfeeding.

Why would they then say that it was safe in pregnancy and breastfeeding?

It apparently also states that they have no idea as to its impact on fertility.

Why would they then claim that it has no impact on fertility?

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by sgallo3

Dorne

Member since Sep 2008

24747 posts

Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:28 am to Scruffy

quote:
Why would they then claim that it has no impact on fertility?

Ummm... Money?

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by Hulkklogan

Baton Rouge, LA

Member since Oct 2010

43308 posts

Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:28 am to Scruffy

I'm not disagreeing with that at all. If they weren't certain it was safe then there should not have been a recommendation.

My post was specifically about the messaging from wherever stout posted from.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by Scruffy

Kansas City

Member since Jul 2011

72196 posts

Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:29 am to Cosmo

quote:
More likely they have no idea which is common for a lot of drugs

Yes, it is common, but we don’t tell people the opposite of that.

We don’t tell them that it is safe if we don’t know.

That is not what happened here.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by BigDawg0420

Hamsterdam

Member since Apr 2010

7398 posts

Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:30 am to OweO

quote:
I'd watch the news throughout the day

There's your problem.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by El Magnifico

La casa de tu mamá

Member since Jan 2014

7017 posts

Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:30 am to stout

Breastfed babies of vaccinated mothers having liver damage

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by LSUfanNkaty

LC, Louisiana

Member since Jan 2015

11129 posts

Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:31 am to stout

I'm honestly thinking about going and getting my vasectomy reversed... my pure blood swimmers are going to be worth mucho dollars

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by Korkstand

Member since Nov 2003

28716 posts

Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:31 am to Cosmo

quote:
So 1 out of 45 died?

bullshite

Yeah obvious fricky math going on here. This "article" makes it out as if these 1223 deaths happened in some trial of only 46k people, but the chart is labeled "post-authorization". These are reported deaths after the vaccines rolled out to untold millions.

Also the miscarriage rate in the report is pretty well in line with average rates.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by Bistineaubengal

Member since Aug 2008

807 posts

Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:31 am to kcpizzle

quote:
Glad me and my family are all purebloods......it didn't take a whole lot of critical thought to know the jab was a bad idea.

We had several family members cave in to the relentless propaganda, including our kid at LSU.

I will never look at LSU the same way again.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by Pettifogger

Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone

Member since Feb 2012

79326 posts

Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:31 am to Hulkklogan

Yeah it doesn't mean anything, just like 90% of drugs out there for pregnant women

You try and look up a drug for a pregnant wife and it's like "well it killed some mice fetuses in 1972 but a 9 person study in Spain showed no ill impacts in 1996, it's Class C"

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by stout

Smoking Crack with Hunter Biden

Member since Sep 2006

167515 posts

Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:32 am to Hulkklogan

quote:
My post was specifically about the messaging from wherever stout posted from.

I think the person was not only alluding to that page but also the data on the 270 pregnant women from the same study

Also, don't ignore the others study showing that there can be as much as a 1500+% increase in miscarriages from the vaccine

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by GetCocky11

Calgary, AB

Member since Oct 2012

51393 posts

Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:32 am to stout

quote:
42,000 had adverse effects

What is an adverse effect?

I had a sore arm for a couple hours. Is that an adverse effect?

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by Warfox

B.R. Native (now in MA)

Member since Apr 2017

3157 posts

Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:34 am to stout

quote:
The absolute risk reduction of the vaccine is .84% meaning the benefit of the vaccine is less than 1% over somebody not vaccinated

I’m as pro-choice as you can be with respect to vaccine choice, but for me the proof is in the pudding; and the pudding is the Covid unit I work on.

99% of deaths after the vaccine rolled out have been in the unvaccinated. In my clinical experience, an up-to-date boostered individual that is admitted with hypoxia(the main requirement for admission) sees their clinical course cut like a knife and best of all they don’t die. These are all patients 70+ mind you(the higher-risk population).

Get the vaccine or don’t the choice ought to be yours to make, but this is what I see in real life.

3 ...

Report Post

Posted by OGtigerfan87

North La

Member since Feb 2019

3419 posts

Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:35 am to stout

Yeah I’m gonna file this as misleading at best and probably bull crap for now. Not saying this vaccine is as wonderful as they made it out to be because obviously it is not. And there almost assuredly is at least a small risk of some post vaccine issues. But until this is substantiated by someone legit it reads like political board conspiracy nonsense. I’m also very pro choice on the vaccine and have been against mandates for it and mask since day 1

This post was edited on 5/4/22 at 9:37 am

« Prev Page Next Page »

Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Return To Board