- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: There was a Pfizer data dump of 90,702 pages while people were arguing about RvW
Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:36 am to stout
Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:36 am to stout
If all of this is true, I have to expect that the people responsible for this are not going to take responsibility for it but are instead about to unleash very bad things on us instead.
0
Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:37 am to Warfox
quote:
99% of deaths after the vaccine rolled out have been in the unvaccinated
Wasn't there a thread just a few weeks ago showing that 67% of people during that week in LA that died of CV were vaccinated?
99% seems made up
Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:37 am to stout
quote:That doesn't even make sense, stout. The normal miscarriage rate is something like 1 in 10. If miscarriages increased by 1,000% there would be zero babies born.
Also, don't ignore the others study showing that there can be as much as a 1500+% increase in miscarriages from the vaccine
Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:37 am to GetCocky11
quote:
What is an adverse effect?
I had a sore arm for a couple hours. Is that an adverse effect?
Yes. No way of knowing the full extent of the "adverse effect", honestly. Which is frustrating, IMO.
Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:37 am to stout
No I would say your stat seems made up or taken out of context at best
Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:38 am to OGtigerfan87
quote:
But until this is substantiated by someone legit
It's Pfizer's own papers from their studies. The same papers they wanted to hide for 75 years but were forced to release thanks to FOIA. How much more substantial could it get than their own data?
Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:39 am to Scruffy
quote:
The more infuriating data pertains to breastfeeding, pregnancy, and fertility.
We were told that there was no impact on any one of those.
We weren’t just told that. People were ostracized, deplatformed, demonetized, etc for raising the question.
Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:40 am to stout
quote:You are reading a very obviously misleading "interpretation" of 90k pages. And you're lapping it up.
It's Pfizer's own papers from their studies. The same papers they wanted to hide for 75 years but were forced to release thanks to FOIA. How much more substantial could it get than their own data?
Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:40 am to Korkstand
quote:
That doesn't even make sense, stout. The normal miscarriage rate is something like 1 in 10. If miscarriages increased by 1,000% there would be zero babies born.
Perhaps I worded that incorrectly
quote:
A study of data found in the USA’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting system has revealed that per number of doses administered the Covid-19 injections are at least 16 times / 1,517% more likely to cause a pregnant woman to suffer a miscarriage than the Flu jab.
LINK
Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:42 am to OGtigerfan87
quote:
No I would say your stat seems made up or taken out of context at best
I can't find the thread but I do recall it being something along those lines for the release from the LDH for that week. It was over 60%
Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:42 am to stout
Well, no one will ever want to look into it and anyone who does will be deemed a conspiracy theorist.
That is how the political/media system works.
And it is also how scientific journals now work.
Journals have already shown a propensity to block the publication of research that appears counter to certain narratives.
That is how the political/media system works.
And it is also how scientific journals now work.
Journals have already shown a propensity to block the publication of research that appears counter to certain narratives.
Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:42 am to Warfox
quote:
99% of deaths after the vaccine rolled out have been in the unvaccinated.
In my clinical experience, I call bullshite. You might have seen a number during your "clinical experience", but you have no way of proving the deaths were covid caused other than a number due to a test.
Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:42 am to stout
quote:
Also, don't ignore the others study showing that there can be as much as a 1500+% increase in miscarriages from the vaccine
You mean like these?
Sept 2021
quote:
Among women with spontaneous abortions, the odds of COVID-19 vaccine exposure were not increased in the prior 28 days compared with women with ongoing pregnancies. Strengths of this surveillance include the availability of a multisite diverse population with robust data capture. Several limitations should be noted. First, gestational age of spontaneous abortions and ongoing pregnancies were not chart confirmed; pregnancy dating may be inaccurate early in pregnancy. Second, although vaccination status was identified using multiple data sources, the COVID-19 vaccine rollout has been complex and some vaccines may have been missed, potentially biasing findings to the null. Third, data on important confounders, such as prior pregnancy history, were not available. Fourth, it was not possible to assess risks specific to the Ad26.COV.2.S vaccine given the small number of exposures. Despite limitations, these data can be used to inform vaccine recommendations and to counsel patients.
Nov 2021
quote:
Our study found no evidence of an increased risk for early pregnancy loss after Covid-19 vaccination and adds to the findings from other reports supporting Covid-19 vaccination during pregnancy
Oct 2021
quote:
Nonetheless, our findings suggest that the risk of spontaneous abortion after mRNA Covid-19 vaccination either before conception or during pregnancy is consistent with the expected risk of spontaneous abortion; these findings add to the accumulating evidence about the safety of mRNA Covid-19 vaccination in pregnancy.5
Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:43 am to stout
quote:
Perhaps I worded that incorrectly
You are still wrong. The normal miscarriage rate is 10 to 20 percent.
This study had 31 miscarriages out of 270 pregnancies. That is pretty close to 10 percent.
They are saying there were 31 miscarriages out of 32 pregnancies to get their 1500%, but in reality the 238 other pregnancies were still ongoing as normal so had no feedback.
Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:44 am to Korkstand
quote:
You are reading a very obviously misleading "interpretation" of 90k pages. And you're lapping it up.
Well, I linked it all for everyone to read and included some pages in my OP. I am not saying I agree with some interpretations of it so I am not "lapping it up" but when the data is there it is sort of hard to ignore.
Especially, as Scruffy pointed out, when we were told the opposite of what some of Pfizer's own data shows.
Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:44 am to stout
Can you link the original article you quoted? The two links in the OP don’t have those quotes that I found.
Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:44 am to Bistineaubengal
Yeah, I know a bunch of people that caved or were held hostage as well. Complete and utter bullshite.
Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:44 am to stout
quote:
How much more substantial could it get than their own data?
Pfizer docs have already been debunked and labeled as misinformation.
Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:45 am to 3rdPart Tiger
quote:
Pfizer docs have already been debunked and labeled as misinformation.
Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:46 am to 3rdPart Tiger
quote:
Pfizer docs have already been debunked and labeled as misinformation.
By whom? Facebook fact checkers? Show me
Page 3 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News