- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: There was a Pfizer data dump of 90,702 pages while people were arguing about RvW
Posted on 5/4/22 at 10:18 am to Bourbonball5012
Posted on 5/4/22 at 10:18 am to Bourbonball5012
quote:
You should probably blame Trump then….
For what? The vaccine that was announced after the election and he had no hand in the ongoing rollout of?
Operation warp speed on the surface was a good idea but it's not like Trump was in there with Pfizer developing the vaccine and it's not like he was there pushing the mandates and approving it for use in younger and younger people after 1/6. That was a different administration if you would recall
1
Posted on 5/4/22 at 10:20 am to Monday
quote:We're "stuck on math" because all of the other things you quoted are bad math. They have chosen figures for their arithmetic that arrive at meaningless stats that are in no way related to what they claim them to be. For example, the 42k adverse effects and 1200 deaths were NOT out of 46k study participants as claimed, but rather out of millions of administered doses.
Pretty funny how we are getting stuck on math when these are maybe more important statements to discuss.
The entirety of this "analysis" is blatantly wrong.
Posted on 5/4/22 at 10:21 am to Korkstand
quote:
It's moreso because you're a loon.
Cool. Label me as you wish. I wear it proudly considering the source.
Posted on 5/4/22 at 10:22 am to Monday
quote:
Pretty funny how we are getting stuck on math when these are maybe more important statements to discuss.
BINGO
Posted on 5/4/22 at 10:22 am to Korkstand
Can you point me to where the good math is located? I'm not trying to argue with you. I'm just not going to discount it because someone on tigerdroppings said so.
Posted on 5/4/22 at 10:24 am to stout
quote:So it's clear now that you believe the throw shite at the wall to see what sticks method is an effective way to persuade people. And I guess it is, you've obviously fallen for it.
People think by potentially discrediting a few things I post that they have somehow discredited it all
Posted on 5/4/22 at 10:25 am to stout
quote:
Out of 46,000 participants in the Pfizer trial study , 42,000 had adverse effects and 1200 died
This alone should have shite canned it.
We tried to tell you all, but you dumbasses took the word of the gubmint
Posted on 5/4/22 at 10:26 am to Korkstand
quote:
the 42k adverse effects and 1200 deaths were NOT out of 46k study participants as claimed, but rather out of millions of administered doses.
How many doses were administered by February of 2021? Because that is where this data is from.
The rest of that data
This post was edited on 5/4/22 at 10:30 am
Posted on 5/4/22 at 10:28 am to Dire Wolf
quote:
operation warp speed and its consequences
I'm sorry but where did Operation Warp Speed force this on people in order to keep providing for their family?
You dishonest dumbfrick
Posted on 5/4/22 at 10:29 am to stout
But those pesky greedy oil companies.
Posted on 5/4/22 at 10:29 am to Korkstand
quote:
And I guess it is, you've obviously fallen for it.
And you just make statements based on your own assumptions as my previous post clearly points out. You assume you are correct instead of looking further into the data.
At least I share links to the data and let people come to their own conclusions instead of being so narcissistic that I assume I am always correct.
Posted on 5/4/22 at 10:30 am to Monday
quote:I'm more trying to help folks recognize the various ways that statistics are manipulated. Sometimes it's subtle, but in this case it is obvious.
Can you point me to where the good math is located?
A couple of tips:
1. If numbers are tossed out which imply that there were more miscarriages than conceptions, you're being lied to
2. If the arithmetic implies that multiple millions of people should have died from adverse reactions to the vaccines, yet reality shows otherwise, you're being lied to
Posted on 5/4/22 at 10:30 am to PureBlood
quote:
I'm sorry but where did Operation Warp Speed force this on people in order to keep providing for their family?
You dishonest dumbfrick
Chill out, prog. I believe it was satire...
Posted on 5/4/22 at 10:30 am to stout
This article reads like propaganda BS. Poor grammar and poor (possibly deliberately) interpretation of some parts of the paper makes me doubt the veracity of most of the article.
Posted on 5/4/22 at 10:31 am to stout
quote:
Wasn't there a thread just a few weeks ago showing that 67% of people during that week in LA that died of CV were vaccinated? 99% seems made up
I’d love to see the exact data on that. We’re these deaths in people fully boostered? Because yes the media/pharmaceuticals lied initially when they claimed one and done(shocker) . You’ll need a booster every 6 months or so if your elderly/high-risk.
So, again, in my experience it has been 99% of fully boostered patients lived. And to add to that: our Covid census has dropped by 75% since the vaccines rolled out and high-risk populations are being regularly boostered.
The entire situation sucks, and China is asshoe, but the vaccine(and now paxlovid) is what we(medicine) have to deal with it, if you want it.
This post was edited on 5/4/22 at 10:34 am
Posted on 5/4/22 at 10:31 am to kcpizzle
quote:
family are all purebloods
This cracks me up every time I see it. Sounds like a rival clan in the Gangs of New York movie, lol!
If you've lived in the good ole USA, you are definitely not a "pureblood" given all the shots and medication you have taken over the years.
Posted on 5/4/22 at 10:33 am to PureBlood
quote:Except that as I have pointed out numerous times, the denominator for that calculation is NOT 46,000.quote:This alone should have shite canned it.
Out of 46,000 participants in the Pfizer trial study , 42,000 had adverse effects and 1200 died
quote:You tried to tell us dumbasses what? If you believe the math above then more than 2% of vaccine recipients would be dead? Where are those tens of millions of people?
We tried to tell you all, but you dumbasses took the word of the gubmint
Posted on 5/4/22 at 10:34 am to stout
I’ve said from day 1 of the pandemic that I have no idea why people took 1,2,3 experimental shots for a 24-month old virus. Just stupid. There is a possibility of side effects… hope not, but this isn’t a normal virus. Engineered.
Posted on 5/4/22 at 10:34 am to stout
quote:I don't know, stout, but it's obviously a bigger number than 46k don't you think?
How many doses were administered by February of 2021?
That's the point, man. You spread obviously false information all the time.
Posted on 5/4/22 at 10:35 am to jmon
People forced to take this vaccine will be suing employers 20 yrs from now. This will be like mesothelioma suits on steroids.
Page 6 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News