Started By
Message

re: There was a Pfizer data dump of 90,702 pages while people were arguing about RvW

Posted on 5/4/22 at 12:19 pm to
Posted by BRIllini07
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2015
3021 posts
Posted on 5/4/22 at 12:19 pm to
quote:

Out of 46,000 participants in the Pfizer trial study , 42,000 had adverse effects and 1200 died


quote:

This alone should have shiite canned if


Except that stat immediately fails the BS test if it’s meant to imply a 1200/46000 death rate for the general public upon vaccination.

There’s a chance that all 46000 jabbed patients in this study were in a nursing home, in which case 1200 of them dying in the observation period may or may not have been a big deal.
Posted by Champagne
Already Conquered USA.
Member since Oct 2007
48546 posts
Posted on 5/4/22 at 12:43 pm to
It was a money-laundering op generated by Crony Capitalism. Big Pharm promises a big pay-day for the DC politicians. FedGov, driven by said politicians, passes a legal regime providing a huge contract to the Big Pharm entity to provide a product in a delivery large enough for the whole country.

Big Pharm entity gets a huge pay day from tax dollars. The politicians who engineered their half of the deal take their own pay day from the Big Pharm entity in a less detectable manner.
Posted by Pooturd
Knoxville
Member since Mar 2020
1258 posts
Posted on 5/4/22 at 12:56 pm to
quote:

No suffering here but keep wishing harm on others weirdo


I will, gladly!
Posted by Armymann50
Playing with my
Member since Sep 2011
17197 posts
Posted on 5/4/22 at 1:49 pm to
Posted by GreenRockTiger
vortex to the whirlpool of despair
Member since Jun 2020
42492 posts
Posted on 5/4/22 at 1:54 pm to
So when does the trash come out on Moderna? Or have I missed it?
Posted by TigerBreath78
Member since Mar 2019
52 posts
Posted on 5/4/22 at 4:55 pm to
You said, "The pic just below says they don't know if it affects pregnant women but couldn't rule it out."

Where exactly do you think you see that in what you posted?
Posted by When in Rome
Telegraph Road
Member since Jan 2011
35563 posts
Posted on 5/4/22 at 5:08 pm to


Can you link to the actual Pfizer doc this is found in? I only ask because I found a near identical section 4.6 in an Australian government AstraZenica report. Could people have tried to conflate the two when these dumps happened?
This post was edited on 5/4/22 at 5:09 pm
Posted by Jack Ruby
Member since Apr 2014
22873 posts
Posted on 5/4/22 at 5:52 pm to
The greatest part of all of this.... NO LAWSUITS ALLOWED!!!!

THANK YOU FDA EMERGENCY AUTHORIZATION!
Posted by TOPAL
Member since Mar 2010
4536 posts
Posted on 5/4/22 at 6:37 pm to
Boy....you spot the people who took the shot in this thread, trying to justify it. When will you dumb MF's wake up and stop trusting the establishment.
Posted by stout
Smoking Crack with Hunter Biden
Member since Sep 2006
167538 posts
Posted on 5/4/22 at 6:49 pm to
That would be hard to confuse the two when BNT162b2 specifically mentioned in that document is referring to the Pfizer vaccine and has nothing to do with AstraZeneca. Theirs is known as AZD1222


LINK
Posted by When in Rome
Telegraph Road
Member since Jan 2011
35563 posts
Posted on 5/4/22 at 7:13 pm to
What I’m saying is that it looks like someone altered that report from Australia/astrazenica to say Pfizer and some alternate wording, screenshotted it, and underlined it to make it look like it came from the document dump to cast even more doubt on the Pfizer vaccine; i.e. making hay while the sun is shining. I am very skeptical of the vaccine but muddying the waters with screenshots that aren’t from the actual documents doesn’t help. I mean, the section title is identical and has the same number. You don't think that's a little suspicious?

Here’s the Australian report, go to section 4.6

Copied directly from the Australia astrazenica report:
quote:

4.6 FERTILITY, PREGNANCY AND LACTATION
Effects on fertility

It is unknown whether COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca may impact fertility. No data are available.

Use in pregnancy – Category B2
There are a limited amount of data from the use of COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca in pregnant women, or women who became pregnant after receiving the vaccine. The data are insufficient to inform on vaccine associated risk. Animal reproductive toxicity studies have not been completed.

As a precautionary measure, vaccination with COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca is not recommended during pregnancy. Use of COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca in pregnant women should be based on an assessment of whether the benefits of vaccination outweigh the potential risks.

Use in lactation
There are no or limited data from the use of COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca in lactating women. A risk to breastfed newborns/infants cannot be excluded.
Now compare that to the screenshot that purportedly came from the Pfizer docs (can you provide a link to the exact Pfizer doc in which this is found?)

This post was edited on 5/4/22 at 7:18 pm
Posted by HeadSlash
TEAM LIVE BADASS - St. GEORGE
Member since Aug 2006
49891 posts
Posted on 5/4/22 at 7:39 pm to
Pureblood ?
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
99231 posts
Posted on 5/4/22 at 7:43 pm to
So not disappointed I didn't get this bullshite.
Posted by stout
Smoking Crack with Hunter Biden
Member since Sep 2006
167538 posts
Posted on 5/4/22 at 7:50 pm to
quote:

What I’m saying is that it looks like someone altered that report from Australia/astrazenica to say Pfizer


But they didn't. I can't find the exact one from my OP but here is another that uses basically the same language in a section 4.6 about Pfizer





The language seems pretty standard when applying for FDA approval


LINK
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56738 posts
Posted on 5/4/22 at 7:51 pm to
quote:

All you need to know. $289 Million a Day on a fricking hoax vaccine that all levels of government and people have been advocating for a year


Advocating?

That understates it by a mile.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56738 posts
Posted on 5/4/22 at 7:53 pm to
quote:

When Covid first started I was keeping up with everything, reading every article I came across. I'd watch the news throughout the day.. And I had to check myself because it was getting to me. Then realized its all too much to the point I decided to stop caring about it.


You are quite the vagina.

Personally I’m mentally and emotionally capable of keeping up. I think most are.
Posted by When in Rome
Telegraph Road
Member since Jan 2011
35563 posts
Posted on 5/4/22 at 8:04 pm to
Interesting, so it could be just a template thing. Well, I am just generally skeptical of screenshots without a direct source link. Maybe the twitterers will go through the 238 documents and be able to link to the exact document that has this section.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56738 posts
Posted on 5/4/22 at 8:05 pm to
quote:

99% of deaths after the vaccine rolled out have been in the unvaccinated.


This is bullshite
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 8Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram