- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The First World War began 112 years ago yesterday...
Posted on 7/29/26 at 2:32 pm to RollTide1987
Posted on 7/29/26 at 2:32 pm to RollTide1987
Princip was imprisoned at Terezin (The Small Fortress), which was a small prison a bit North of Prague. He died of TB after serving 4 years there.
During WWII, it would become a concentration camp for political opponents of the Nazis. While it held over 32,000 prisoners, they only executed 250 of them by firing squad. Another 2,6000 would die as a result of hunger, torture or poor hygiene. Thousands more died after being transported from Terezin to other concentration camps.
It served as a German POW camp after the war from 1945-1948.
During WWII, it would become a concentration camp for political opponents of the Nazis. While it held over 32,000 prisoners, they only executed 250 of them by firing squad. Another 2,6000 would die as a result of hunger, torture or poor hygiene. Thousands more died after being transported from Terezin to other concentration camps.
It served as a German POW camp after the war from 1945-1948.
Posted on 7/29/26 at 2:37 pm to TheHarahanian
WWI started because a bungling assassin got all the luck in the world.
—no, the killing of the future king of Austria-Hungary did not start WWI.
The reactions to it by selfish and short-sighted leaders caused WWI. None of them had to take the steps they chose.
—no, the killing of the future king of Austria-Hungary did not start WWI.
The reactions to it by selfish and short-sighted leaders caused WWI. None of them had to take the steps they chose.
Posted on 7/29/26 at 2:42 pm to Lawyered
quote:
And also, arguably more importantly, all related too. A bunch of squabbling cousins dragged Europe into hell
Roll Tide!
Posted on 7/29/26 at 2:55 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
They felt like they deserved a bigger piece of the pie than what they got.
No. Had nothing to do with it. They attacked China for several reasons with the biggest being resources and empire expansion. Now, the May 4th movement was chinese anger, not Japan's.
Japan hit Pearl for the same basic reasons: the sanctions due to attacking china and they were backed into a corner over resources.
Posted on 7/29/26 at 3:07 pm to cypresstiger
quote:
The reactions to it by selfish and short-sighted leaders caused WWI. None of them had to take the steps they chose.
The only leader who could have chosen differently was Franz Joseph, and he had likely just seen his line come to an end with his nephew’s assassination.
Everybody else was bound by the agreements they signed.
Posted on 7/29/26 at 3:33 pm to Spaceman Spiff
quote:
No. Had nothing to do with it. They attacked China for several reasons with the biggest being resources and empire expansion. Now, the May 4th movement was chinese anger, not Japan's.
The May Fourth Movement itself was ignited in May 1919 by the decision at the Paris Peace Conference to transfer those German possessions in Shandong to Japan rather than return them to China. Students and intellectuals saw it as a betrayal of Wilson’s self-determination rhetoric and of China’s own contribution to the Allied war effort. Without the Japanese occupation of Tsingtao and the subsequent diplomatic confirmation of Japanese claims, that particular flashpoint would not have existed. So the capture both physically placed Japanese forces deeper into China and generated the concrete grievance that made the mass nationalist outburst possible.
That sequence of events did not make the 1931 Mukden Incident inevitable, but it raised the stakes, hardened Chinese resistance, and left Japanese militarists convinced that only firmer, more direct control (especially in resource-rich Manchuria) could secure Japan’s position against rising Chinese nationalism that the postwar order had inadvertently strengthened.
So yes, Japanese actions in the 1930s were directly fueled by the events of the First World War.
This post was edited on 7/29/26 at 3:35 pm
Posted on 7/29/26 at 4:01 pm to TheHarahanian
Everybody else was bound by the agreements they signed.
—Paper agreements are on paper.
—Paper agreements are on paper.
Popular
Back to top


0






