Favorite team:LSU 
Location:Columbia
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:11160
Registered on:8/31/2015
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
quote:

duty to act and requirement to act are two entirely different things

I don't know or recall what difference there is in the two, but there is still the issue I see where if there is no duty/ requirement to act, fine. Move so someone else can. The problem is government monopolizing action of individuals, such as FEMA disallowing individuals to render aids or supplies in the Carolina hurricane flooding but then not helping people their own selves.

What society will we have when individuals have given up their ability and expectation to protect themselves and provide for their communities, and they have given that role to government, and then that government refuses to act?

I cannot, legally or as a parent or as an American, reconcile a non obligation by law enforcement to go in there but prevent parents from going in, then not be held accountable. Thoughts.
quote:

Police aren’t military under the law. They can’t be ordered on a suicide mission. They also have no duty under the law to protect specific people. The Supreme Court has already ruled on this

Scalia wrote the majority opinion. I remember covering it in law school. Clarify, was that only protection from civil liability, though? If it were to extend to criminal liability, would not a motion have not been filed before trial to prevent the attempt to charhe the officer, or perhaps just appeal a conviction of he were convicted?

What doesn't make sense is that there is no criminal or civil liability for inaction by officers when they can ALSO prevent parents from going in to do their natural duty. Either officers have no affirmative duty to go into such a situation and thus cannot prevent parents from going OR they fricking go in.
quote:

actually it was huge through all of acadiana until late 70s. and pretty much only french was spoken at the fights. so not culcha. Cockfighting goes way way back in LA history, spaniards also made it grown here.

jays cockpit in cankton had international visitors back in the day.

For sure. Cock fighting has been a thing in numerous cultures, like in Mexico. Certainly not just black folks did it in Louisiana. But I do take this to be an extension of dog fighting at this point in history. After all, maybe unless they've got it to where the chickens don't kill each other, that's a little messed up.
quote:

It’s a culture to us. Some of us treat these animals like our kids.”

More of a culcha. Hope some folks treat their chickens better than they treat their kids.
4.

We also had a couple miscarriages preceding, so 4 isn't entirely accurate.
quote:

well heilheil, you riding the wrong horse. the guy on trial was one person out of the 350 cops attending that day. His sin, he was one of the first, did not know what was going on, hesitated for 3 whole minutes, trying to understand if there was one shooter, or 3 or 4. Did not know where the person/persons were. The 2 week trial was appropriately settled by the jury in 1 hour .


The specific facts always matter. I cannot accept, however, that at least ONE officer should not face criminal liability consequences. Which one? On exactly what charge? That is for the prosecutor to get right.

But if we are to say from the SCOTUS case years ago that officers are not affirmatively obligated to come to any specific call and thus are not civilly liable for crimes that happen to individuals, and if we cannot get criminal liability in this case, then NEVER again can an officer prevent a citizen from attempting to stop a crime again.

To be held back outside a school while knowing my baby is crying inside and wondering where her hero daddy is to come save her while she bleeds out alone with her dead teacher because some robo cops want to prep some more is an unimaginable horror, an unforgivable sin.

Officers either have an obligation or not. Do the duty or let the parents do their job.
quote:

defenders say it's standard for community organizing

Ah, muh "both sides."

Charlie Kirk.
I understand white flight and red lining.

I am not saying it was appropriate, at least not in the 50s and 60s before culcha as we know it developed. I am saying I understand the process.
quote:

The two party radical system will kill this country.

Well it's had nigh on 250 years to do so. We went two party pretty quickly. Maybe it could be better with a third major, but no, we haven't imploded.
quote:

That explains why my penis grew an inch this afternoon.

That wasn't your penis.
quote:

When he finally docked...illegally and without a visa, the FSB found a rifle and ammunition on board during a customs inspection.

Where are the anti ICE rioters to come attack churches in his defense?
quote:

saying they were simply exercising their Constitutional rights to protest.

Protesting =/= trespass, assault, and personal space intrusion. More Marxist defining things to mean something different from what they actually are.
I don't think I could afford a billion dollars, and I'm not sure whom to make the check out to, but I'm sure I could get a loan for 100k to pay to punch my wife.
quote:

While space colonization is still widely considered a science-fiction pipe dream

No. It's just a matter of time.
Gurl u foot ashy af frfr ong I ngl
quote:

Winning so much it's exhausting

Sounds like an insurance issue, but keep up the TDS.
My wife (no pics) is a high school teacher (a good one, and no relations with students lol), and she has already started doing some reverting to handwriting assignments/papers in class because of AI.
This is Marxism. Also, "It's just a law school theory, bro."

re: Nothing against BK

Posted by Barbellthor on 1/17/26 at 5:14 am to
quote:

Nothing against BK

Well I disagree.