Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

New Jersey officers dress up as shrubs to catch distracted drivers on their phones

Posted on 7/31/26 at 4:33 pm
Posted by Shexter
Prairieville
Member since Feb 2014
21574 posts
Posted on 7/31/26 at 4:33 pm
quote:

DUNELLEN, New Jersey (WABC) -- Did you spot any odd-looking shrubs while driving in New Jersey on Wednesday? If you didn't, you might have been on your phone.

The Dunellen Police Department dressed up as shrubs to catch distracted drivers in the act.




quote:

Officers placed themselves on North Washington Avenue, a highly trafficked, pedestrian-heavy downtown area.

At this location, officers issued 74 citations to drivers they say were distracted by their devices within a six-hour period.

It was an effort to enforce New Jersey's Handheld Cell Phone Law.

Now officers are reminding drivers to keep their eyes on the road.


https://abc7ny.com/post/dunellen-nj-officers-dress-shrubs-catch-distracted-drivers-act-cellphones/19603593/


Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
24459 posts
Posted on 7/31/26 at 4:34 pm to
This is funny.

Much better than flock cams and the like.

Posted by BrianKellysbuyout
Member since Nov 2025
1930 posts
Posted on 7/31/26 at 4:36 pm to
Just my opinion, and not exclusive to this, but I think there should always be a visibility requirement for any police/civilian interaction that results in a citation.
Posted by RanchoLaPuerto
Jena
Member since Aug 2023
2324 posts
Posted on 7/31/26 at 4:40 pm to
Hedging their bets.
Posted by NotoriousFSU
Atlanta, GA
Member since Oct 2008
12629 posts
Posted on 7/31/26 at 4:44 pm to
That’s bush league.
Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
24459 posts
Posted on 7/31/26 at 4:59 pm to
Would you call this a brush with the law?
Posted by High C
viewing the fall....
Member since Nov 2012
61906 posts
Posted on 7/31/26 at 5:02 pm to
This is some government surveillance I can get behind. I don’t know if I have a bigger pet peeve right now than people staring at their phones while driving.
Posted by ZombieCajun
Lafayette
Member since Jan 2026
44 posts
Posted on 7/31/26 at 5:05 pm to
quote:

Just my opinion, and not exclusive to this, but I think there should always be a visibility requirement for any police/civilian interaction that results in a citation.


It's not prevention, it's predatory.
Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
24459 posts
Posted on 7/31/26 at 5:24 pm to
quote:

It's not prevention, it's predatory.


People could just stop playing on their phones while driving.
Posted by High C
viewing the fall....
Member since Nov 2012
61906 posts
Posted on 7/31/26 at 5:29 pm to
quote:

It's not prevention, it's predatory.


I pray that neither you nor any of your relatives is ever in an accident caused by a distracted driver on his phone.
Posted by UFFan
Planet earth, Milky Way Galaxy
Member since Aug 2016
3786 posts
Posted on 7/31/26 at 5:29 pm to
I might not realize that's a cop, but it would be extremely obvious to me that that's a person rather than a plant.
Posted by gizmothepug
Louisiana
Member since Apr 2015
8773 posts
Posted on 7/31/26 at 5:39 pm to
quote:

It's not prevention, it's predatory.


I agree to a point. People shouldn’t be looking at a phone while driving, I also know it’s about the ticket money going back into the system that’s generating all of this. If a cop can look down and operate a literal laptop while driving, what’s the difference between that and me looking at a text? Neither should happen, but I’ll get a ticket and the cop operating a laptop goes on about his or hers day.
Posted by BHM
Member since Jun 2012
4091 posts
Posted on 7/31/26 at 5:39 pm to
quote:

It's not prevention, it's predatory.


So a cop standing on the sidewalk where you can see him in advance and put your phone down is prevention?

Guess it is precention until about 30 feet past the cop.
Posted by gizmothepug
Louisiana
Member since Apr 2015
8773 posts
Posted on 7/31/26 at 5:51 pm to
This in particular is nothing more than some BS publicity stunt to get people like us to talk about it on random message boards across the internet. At its core, it’s a double standard when it comes to police officers VS citizens when it comes to the whole hands free thing.
Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
24459 posts
Posted on 7/31/26 at 5:54 pm to
quote:

I might not realize that's a cop, but it would be extremely obvious to me that that's a person rather than a plant.


Unless you were playing on your phone.
Posted by UFFan
Planet earth, Milky Way Galaxy
Member since Aug 2016
3786 posts
Posted on 7/31/26 at 5:58 pm to
I'd probably slow down because I'd want to get a look at that wacky person who's dressed up as a plant.

Even though I probably wouldn't realize it's a policeman, it would be the same practical effect as if I saw a policeman. I'd end up slowing my car down.

I think this town would be better off just having some officers dressed in plainclothes look for speeders.
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
21786 posts
Posted on 7/31/26 at 6:35 pm to
quote:

Much better than flock cams and the like.


This, at least there's the semblance of public safety.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram