Started By
Message

re: Megan Rapinoe "shocked" by judge's decision on equal pay claims

Posted on 5/5/20 at 2:53 pm to
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89412 posts
Posted on 5/5/20 at 2:53 pm to
quote:

Also, didn't they sign the fricking contract?



They didn't bet on themselves and now are paying the price for not having to assume any risk. Can't have it both ways.
Posted by BeepNode
Lafayette
Member since Feb 2014
10005 posts
Posted on 5/5/20 at 2:53 pm to
quote:

we've outperformed the men's team


Ya'll should be demanding that the women's team play the men's team to see if that's true.
Posted by Barstools
Atlanta
Member since Jan 2016
12128 posts
Posted on 5/5/20 at 2:54 pm to
quote:

Man team girl power has been taking some L’s in the last couple days



Like that time they lost to a bunch of 14 year old boys?

LINK
This post was edited on 5/5/20 at 2:54 pm
Posted by skullhawk
My house
Member since Nov 2007
27999 posts
Posted on 5/5/20 at 2:54 pm to
quote:

If they could stay within 5 goals of the men's team, then maybe. But they would get destroyed. Not worth what the men are.



5 goals?

They couldn't beat a local team of 14 year old boys. The Men's team could beat them 20-0 if they wanted to.

She's either lying or ignorant of the situation. They negotiated their current deal because it paid more than they would have made under the men's deal.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
43088 posts
Posted on 5/5/20 at 2:55 pm to
If that’s the case it seems like they want to choose a contract after the contract period was over.
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
88462 posts
Posted on 5/5/20 at 2:55 pm to
They turned down the exact same contract as the men. What they wanted was the US entity to cover another 34 million the men get through the fifa cup. The US was like “that has shite to do with us.” And laughed in their faces as the judge told them that was a completely unreasonable request after being offered equal pay.
This post was edited on 5/5/20 at 2:56 pm
Posted by AwesomeSauce
Das Boot
Member since May 2015
11652 posts
Posted on 5/5/20 at 2:55 pm to
At this point how can the US soccer federation have true negotiations with the USWNT when this deal is done? The kowtowed and gave them everything they wanted last go around and then the women wanted to renig in the deal because the deal they rejected would have been more lucrative than the guaranteed money they accepted. Add in the ancillary benefits they get the men don't like their soccer league being kept afloat by the federation, their additional health benefits. All of this and the USWNT have thrown the federation under the bus and ran them through the mud because the federation wouldn't give them the contract they turned down while the contract they wanted was still valid. How can there possibly be good faith negotiations between the two moving forward?
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
117300 posts
Posted on 5/5/20 at 2:56 pm to
quote:

I didn't feel like the ruling really captured the heart of what we're after."


You were after more money than you contracted for, without the inherent risk of the men's CBA.

Just like a fricking woman.
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
91718 posts
Posted on 5/5/20 at 2:57 pm to
damn, i mean... Just look how much bigger that one 15 year old player is than the best female player. They wouldnt stand a fricking chance physically against the mens team that didnt even qualify.
This post was edited on 5/5/20 at 2:58 pm
Posted by jmcwhrter
Member since Nov 2012
8147 posts
Posted on 5/5/20 at 2:58 pm to
this is like saying the Minnesota Lynx franchise -- with its 4 WNBA championships -- is somehow worth more than the Timberwolves
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
117300 posts
Posted on 5/5/20 at 2:58 pm to
I propose that on January 2 of every year, the men's team and the women's team play - winner gets to choose which contract they want for the year (men's CBA or women's CBA).
Posted by DemonKA3268
Parts Unknown
Member since Oct 2015
21240 posts
Posted on 5/5/20 at 3:01 pm to
quote:

I propose that on January 2 of every year, the men's team and the women's team play - winner gets to choose which contract they want for the year (men's CBA or women's CBA).


If they are truly "equal" in this regards, it shouldn't be a problem. Right?

Posted by noonan
Nassau Bay, TX
Member since Aug 2005
37017 posts
Posted on 5/5/20 at 3:01 pm to
quote:

I feel like really misses the heart of the gender discrimination suit that we brought against the federation."


Suit up and play against the men's team. Then let's talk.
Posted by Tigerbait357
Member since Jun 2011
71193 posts
Posted on 5/5/20 at 3:09 pm to
quote:

Megan Rapinoe


Posted by IAmNERD
Member since May 2017
24518 posts
Posted on 5/5/20 at 3:11 pm to
quote:

If we were under the men's contract – which for the record we asked to be under the men's contract, it was repeatedly refused to us, not only in the structure but in the total compensation – if we were under that contract, we would, you know, earn at least three times higher than we have.

Apparently, she doesn't understand the concept of a contract negotiation. Just because you ask for certain clauses in a contract doesn't mean you should, or will get them. And nobody forced anyone to sign it.
Posted by Wild Thang
YAW YAW Fooball Nation
Member since Jun 2009
44181 posts
Posted on 5/5/20 at 3:15 pm to
quote:

Megan Rapinoe


frick that dyke
Posted by Alabama Slim
Team Massie
Member since Jul 2007
10666 posts
Posted on 5/5/20 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

Didn't they try to frame the argument by showing their revenue in a WC year to the revenue of the men's team in a non WC year?


To be fair every year is a non WC year for our shitty men's team.
Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
24485 posts
Posted on 5/5/20 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

Apparently, she doesn't understand the concept of a contract negotiation. Just because you ask for certain clauses in a contract doesn't mean you should, or will get them. And nobody forced anyone to sign it.


Oh no, she understands just fine. Just is just acting like an entitled millennial that wants her cake and to eat it to. She thinks that just because they win in a sport that has low revenue generation that she deserves as much or more money as players in a sport with a lot of revenue.
Posted by jcaz
Laffy
Member since Aug 2014
19461 posts
Posted on 5/5/20 at 3:16 pm to
Courts side in their favor: “Praise the wisdom of these courts and fair judges!”
Courts don’t side in their favor: “These judges are clearly just misognyist. We will keep fighting this injustice! Reeeeeeeee”
Posted by yellowfin
Coastal Bar
Member since May 2006
99045 posts
Posted on 5/5/20 at 3:21 pm to
quote:

shocked


That’s what happens when someone that kicks a ball for a living tries to understand how laws and businesses work
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram