- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Megan Rapinoe "shocked" by judge's decision on equal pay claims
Posted on 5/5/20 at 3:54 pm to The Spleen
Posted on 5/5/20 at 3:54 pm to The Spleen
quote:
If by competitive match you mean one where they play their normal lineup and go 100%, I think the USWNT would win more times than not
Posted on 5/5/20 at 3:55 pm to tylercsbn9
This isn't some shocking story either.
Our college women's BB team regularly got worked in practice by fraternity teams.
The worst part about this is that it's genuinely unfair to pit them head to head. Girls who are the best at what they do shouldn't be compared to men with physical advantages that don't come from merit, but from nature.
But most of the time, guys aren't pulling this shite out of thin air to put women down. It comes up because the women disparage men's sports.
Our college women's BB team regularly got worked in practice by fraternity teams.
The worst part about this is that it's genuinely unfair to pit them head to head. Girls who are the best at what they do shouldn't be compared to men with physical advantages that don't come from merit, but from nature.
But most of the time, guys aren't pulling this shite out of thin air to put women down. It comes up because the women disparage men's sports.
Posted on 5/5/20 at 3:55 pm to baldona
quote:
So both the men and women are making comparable amounts before the FIFA contribution. So basically the women are pissed they aren't getting the men's FIFA contribution?
Correct, the women want to piggyback men's FIFA revenue...having cake and eating it too.
No one gives a shite about women's soccer.
Posted on 5/5/20 at 3:57 pm to RLDSC FAN
quote:
Klausner effectively concluded that differences in payment structure were the result of choices made by the women's players and their union -- including guaranteed annual salaries of at least $100,000 for 20 contracted players -- and not discrimination by the federation.
The 32-page ruling went through a detailed history of the collective bargaining process that led to the current CBA between U.S. Soccer and the USWNTPA that was signed in 2017. Klausner noted that representatives for the players rejected a pay-for-play model identical to the men early in those negotiations in 2016. In later negotiations, the players offered a counterproposal with lesser bonuses than the federation's offer in exchange for more contracted players and higher base salaries -- benefits not part of the CBA between U.S. Soccer and the men's union.
She should be shocked at her union because they turned down the incentive and play based CBA in favor of more guaranteed money.
And for the rest of it, she needs to take up her problem with FIFA and not the US Soccer federation. Not US Soccer's fault that FIFA has a $400 million prize pool for the men's World Cup vs $30 million for the most recent women's World Cup. Hell, the men's champion alone got $38 million...more than the entire field for the women's tournament.
Posted on 5/5/20 at 3:58 pm to jmcwhrter
quote:
this is like saying the Minnesota Lynx franchise -- with its 4 WNBA championships -- is somehow worth more than the Timberwolves
This!
Posted on 5/5/20 at 3:58 pm to The Spleen
quote:
If by competitive match you mean one where they play their normal lineup and go 100%, I think the USWNT would win more times than not. Do I think they intentionally tanked that game? No. I do think they likely played a lot of inexperienced players, tried some players out at new positions, experimented with some different tactics, and the players went maybe 80% to avoid injuries. That's common on the international stage.
I think the point is that the USWNT would lose, and probably lose badly, to scores of teenage boys teams across the country (national, club academies, etc.).
I have no idea if they could beat the U-14s, but obviously it's ridiculous for Rapinoe to talk about outperforming the USMNT given that they could play 100 games against the men and wouldn't score. And again, I'm not diminishing the USWNT for sport - shitting on the men's team is something their "stars" do regularly - which is why these topics come up.
Posted on 5/5/20 at 3:58 pm to The Spleen
quote:
by competitive match you mean one where they play their normal lineup and go 100%, I think the USWNT would win more times than not.
What a fig.
A professional team lost to barely pubescent middle schoolers.
That same garbage professional team then demands equal pay with males who actually compete with real athletes.
They ran up the score 13-0 on a thai team that had only made their 2nd world cup appearance ever, hilarious.
How are you this dumb?
Posted on 5/5/20 at 3:59 pm to Wild Thang
quote:
frick that dyke
Some of you have really strong feelings towards womens soccer
Who gives a frick if they aren't happy about being paid
Posted on 5/5/20 at 4:06 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
I think the point is that the USWNT would lose, and probably lose badly, to scores of teenage boys teams across the country (national, club academies, etc.).
Yeah, I don't agree with that at all. A full strength USWNT going 100% would beat almost every teenage boys team in the country. Their technical prowess and chemistry is on a different level. There are probably a handful that could go toe to toe with them and a few could probably beat them.
quote:
it's ridiculous for Rapinoe to talk about outperforming the USMNT given that they could play 100 games against the men and wouldn't score.
I took her point to be that on the international stage the women's team has had infinitely better success than the men's team has. I don't necessarily think that qualifies them for equal pay though.
Posted on 5/5/20 at 4:07 pm to LNCHBOX
It’s also worth noting the women’s team is good because for decades other countries (especially in Europe) didn’t focus more than two cents on their women’s soccer programs. With Title IX the USA did. I’d say in another 10 years the USA won’t be winning with as much regularity as women’s programs are ramping up rapidly. Especially in Europe. If they had any smarts they should try to consider that during their next negotiation
This post was edited on 5/5/20 at 4:10 pm
Posted on 5/5/20 at 4:08 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
obviously it's ridiculous for Rapinoe to talk about outperforming the USMNT given that they could play 100 games against the men and wouldn't scor
She's talking about the team comparative success like world cup wins/records, not a direct head to head performance dude
Posted on 5/5/20 at 4:09 pm to The Spleen
quote:
Yeah, I don't agree with that at all. A full strength USWNT going 100% would beat almost every teenage boys team in the country.
Clearly not, since they got their arse whipped 5-2 by FC Dallas U-15 junior squad
Posted on 5/5/20 at 4:11 pm to tylercsbn9
quote:
I’d say in another 10 years the USA won’t be winning with as much regularity as women’s programs are ramping up rapidly. Especially in Europe.
It'll likely be less than 10 years. The gap has closed tremendously, and that was somewhat evident the last World Cup. with another 4 years of age in Morgan, Lloyd, Rapinoe, and a few others, I wouldn't be surprised to see another country as the favorite in the next World Cup.
Posted on 5/5/20 at 4:11 pm to The Spleen
I like how you think WNBA teams and NBA teams should garner equal pay. Dumb. arse.
Or in this case the USWNT and Men's professional team.
Or in this case the USWNT and Men's professional team.
Posted on 5/5/20 at 4:11 pm to The Spleen
quote:
Yeah, I don't agree with that at all
Because you're a dumbass.
quote:
Their technical prowess and chemistry is on a different level.
They would get beat the frick down by most of 5A teams in LA.
Posted on 5/5/20 at 4:12 pm to The Spleen
quote:
Yeah, I don't agree with that at all. A full strength USWNT going 100% would beat almost every teenage boys team in the country. Their technical prowess and chemistry is on a different level. There are probably a handful that could go toe to toe with them and a few could probably beat them.
Listen, I don't know exactly where the line would fall, but I have high confidence
that every U-17 MLS club team in America would beat them. They'd get absolutely destroyed by the U-17 USMNT.
Posted on 5/5/20 at 4:13 pm to teke184
quote:
Remind me, didn’t the women’s team explicitly demand NOT to be under the men’s contract because the contract they got instead had a higher downside guarantee?
Yes, and she's "shocked" by this reality.
Posted on 5/5/20 at 4:15 pm to RLDSC FAN
I think the only way to solve this is a winner takes all match between the men’s and women’s team. The winning team will take their own salaries as well as the salaries of the losing team.
Posted on 5/5/20 at 4:17 pm to Ed Osteen
quote:
She's talking about the team comparative success like world cup wins/records, not a direct head to head performance dude
Literally everyone is aware of this
She's comparing WC to WC, however, which is absurd given the disparity in depth of competition, investments into national teams, revenue generation, popularity, talent pool, etc.
Posted on 5/5/20 at 4:17 pm to RLDSC FAN
Get ready for this to be an issue with College sports very soon with the new rules on players getting paid for likeness.
Its coming
Its coming
Popular
Back to top


1








