- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Louisiana COVID-19 - July 23, 2020 Update: 101,650 cases - 3,574 deaths - 1,174,868 tested
Posted on 7/23/20 at 12:30 pm to OysterPoBoy
Posted on 7/23/20 at 12:30 pm to OysterPoBoy
No and I’m sorry for those. But we have seemingly plenty of those for those who need them as opposed to beds that JBE and others keep screaming about. Although LDH numbers themselves show good availability.
Posted on 7/23/20 at 12:30 pm to TigersSEC2010
Received results this morning from a test 16 days ago. The backlog on these things skew the numbers pretty hard I’d imagine
This post was edited on 7/23/20 at 3:41 pm
Posted on 7/23/20 at 12:31 pm to makersmark1
I told you. By Wednesday
Posted on 7/23/20 at 12:32 pm to TigersSEC2010
JBE presser at 2:30 today, what is he going to crawfish on?
Posted on 7/23/20 at 12:32 pm to CubsFanBudMan
quote:
It's a mixed bag. If someone tests positive on June 15 and July 15 and is not hospitalized, then it gets tricky. If you leave the June 15 and remove the July 15, then they would be presumed to be recovered since they are not hospitalized or dead. But it's also not a new case in July, so the June test should stand and July removed.
This is how I see it as well, I think it depends on what you are trying to use the information for.
If you are trying to track the # of people w/ active cases, I would agree with removing the older data as it would provide a more conservative approach by assuming more positive cases.
If you are trying to see historical information to determine when the spread occurred, I think you need to remove the newer result bc they most likely are still positive from the original spread.
Posted on 7/23/20 at 12:35 pm to TigersSEC2010
I think we are gonna have restrictions through end of the year.
This thing will run its course.
We'll see numbers of like 5 ppl dieing in a week.
But, because it's not zero infections they'll try and control us.
The new goalpost is already stated.
Vaccine.
We'll be in this bizarre "New Normal" until we get a vaccine.
And the government already has plans to shame us healthy ppl into getting a rushed vaccine.
This thing will run its course.
We'll see numbers of like 5 ppl dieing in a week.
But, because it's not zero infections they'll try and control us.
The new goalpost is already stated.
Vaccine.
We'll be in this bizarre "New Normal" until we get a vaccine.
And the government already has plans to shame us healthy ppl into getting a rushed vaccine.
This post was edited on 7/23/20 at 12:37 pm
Posted on 7/23/20 at 12:50 pm to Privateer 2007
quote:
And the government already has plans to shame us healthy ppl into getting a rushed vaccine.
Not this healthy person....
Posted on 7/23/20 at 12:55 pm to LSUGUMBO
I won’t be I won’t be taking a rushed vaccine either.
This post was edited on 7/23/20 at 12:57 pm
Posted on 7/23/20 at 1:16 pm to TigersSEC2010
For those trying to understand how the state incorporates their backlog data note that yesterday the 21st showed 17 deaths on the 21st, but shows 19 when corrected today. 20th has 28 and 22 has 8.
July 16th is 14.5% positive today. Lets see how much it changes over the next few days with older tests rolling in. July 5th has held tight at 15.01, so it appears any daily data nominally affects that far back.
July 16th is 14.5% positive today. Lets see how much it changes over the next few days with older tests rolling in. July 5th has held tight at 15.01, so it appears any daily data nominally affects that far back.
This post was edited on 7/23/20 at 1:17 pm
Posted on 7/23/20 at 1:17 pm to OysterPoBoy
quote:
It looks good on the surface but 9 of those 4 needed a ventilator.
Have I told you lately that you're one of my favorite posters?
Posted on 7/23/20 at 1:38 pm to Glock17
quote:
Good to see the new hospitalization number so small today. Let’s hope it starts decreasing soon
I’m all for good news but yesterday was a 60 death count day. It seems like we are possibly at or near a plateau, but those numbers have to read together with the rolling averages.
Posted on 7/23/20 at 1:57 pm to TigerstuckinMS
quote:
TigerstuckinMS

Posted on 7/23/20 at 1:58 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
Received rustle this morning from a test 16 days ago. The backlog on these things skew the numbers pretty hard I’d imagine
I read posts from numerous folks on another site that their results were taking over two weeks. There were some who tested in the first days of July and still do not have any results. Are they even accommodating for that?
Posted on 7/23/20 at 2:01 pm to Gris Gris
quote:
Are they even accommodating for that?
Yes.
Posted on 7/23/20 at 2:32 pm to TigersSEC2010
CNN article via MSN
Guess Birx doesn't want anything to do with Destroya.
quote:
There are cities that are lagging behind and we have new increases in Miami, New Orleans, Las Vegas, San Jose, St. Louis, Indianapolis, Minneapolis, Cleveland, Nashville, Pittsburgh, Columbus and Baltimore, so we're tracking this very closely. We're working with the state officials to make sure we're responding together, but when you first see that increased test positivity, that is when to start the mitigation efforts," Birx said during the call according to audio obtained by journalism nonprofit Center for Public Integrity.
quote:
But at least two of the cities she mentioned as an area of concern, Baltimore and New Orleans, were not invited to the call and were not aware it was happening
Guess Birx doesn't want anything to do with Destroya.
Posted on 7/23/20 at 3:37 pm to TigersSEC2010
With a population of ~4,648,794 that is:
25.27% of population tested or 1 out of every 4
2.19% of population infected or 1 out of every 46
0.077% of population died or 1 out of every 1300
25.27% of population tested or 1 out of every 4
2.19% of population infected or 1 out of every 46
0.077% of population died or 1 out of every 1300
Posted on 7/23/20 at 3:40 pm to NorthEndZone
What random info. What does it mean to you?
This post was edited on 7/23/20 at 3:40 pm
Posted on 7/23/20 at 3:40 pm to John88
We are heading in the wrong direction with vents and hospitals. He gonna use this to keep us in phase 2 for a while. Really don’t see us going back to phase 1 but you never know
Posted on 7/23/20 at 3:44 pm to Weekend Warrior79
quote:
New Orleans
Orleans Parish is not a hot spot. These people fricking suck.
quote:
Birx doesn't want anything to do with Destroya.
Can't really blame her.
Popular
Back to top


0





