Started By
Message

Let’s talk about .9 repeating

Posted on 6/6/26 at 11:16 am
Posted by UFFan
Planet earth, Milky Way Galaxy
Member since Aug 2016
3206 posts
Posted on 6/6/26 at 11:16 am
Do you really believe that it actually equals 1?

I think it comes infinitely close to 1 without equaling 1, TBH.
Posted by ezride25
Constitutional Republic
Member since Nov 2008
26617 posts
Posted on 6/6/26 at 11:18 am to
No.

Because otherwise we’d all be saying .9 repeating, 2, 3 instead of 1, 2, 3.
Posted by Clames
Member since Oct 2010
19668 posts
Posted on 6/6/26 at 11:21 am to
quote:

I think it comes infinitely close to 1 without equaling 1, TBH.



Did you just learn about the concept of limits in pre-calculus?
Posted by auggie
Opelika, Alabama
Member since Aug 2013
31708 posts
Posted on 6/6/26 at 11:21 am to
I rate this thread at .9 out of a possible 1,000.
Posted by Archives
Member since Mar 2026
451 posts
Posted on 6/6/26 at 11:21 am to
Sounds very DEI like
Posted by Everyday Is Saturday
Member since Dec 2025
1857 posts
Posted on 6/6/26 at 11:24 am to
I moved on to 2 already.

Try to keep up.
Posted by CFDoc
Member since Jan 2013
2283 posts
Posted on 6/6/26 at 11:26 am to
What would you call (1/3)*3?
Posted by PJinAtl
Atlanta
Member since Nov 2007
14533 posts
Posted on 6/6/26 at 11:31 am to
quote:

Do you really believe that it actually equals 1?

No, but 2+2=5 for extremely high values of 2.
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
90148 posts
Posted on 6/6/26 at 11:40 am to
When you prove it out it equals 1.

If x=.99 then 10x=9.99

Subtract the equations.

10x-x=9.99-.99

9x=9

What's x?

1

Posted by Radio One
On the banks of the Wabash
Member since Sep 2023
6348 posts
Posted on 6/6/26 at 12:44 pm to
My kingdom for a math major to butt into this thread, but sadly there’s only a thousand exercise science alums.
Posted by forkedintheroad
Member since Feb 2025
2420 posts
Posted on 6/6/26 at 12:48 pm to
quote:

What would you call (1/3)*3?


To a computer, zero.
Posted by BranchDawg
Flowery Branch
Member since Nov 2013
10102 posts
Posted on 6/6/26 at 12:51 pm to
quote:

If x=.99 then 10x=9.99


Wrong.

If x=.99 then 10x=9.90

9.90-.99=8.91

It doesn’t matter how many repeating 9’s you keep tacking on, there’s also always a zero at the end, because the number of potential digits is infinite, which means .99 repeating can never equal 1.
This post was edited on 6/6/26 at 12:53 pm
Posted by Kjnstkmn
Vermilion Parish
Member since Aug 2020
22093 posts
Posted on 6/6/26 at 12:53 pm to
quote:

I rate this thread at .9



3.4999999999
Posted by Tarps99
Lafourche Parish
Member since Apr 2017
12873 posts
Posted on 6/6/26 at 12:54 pm to
quote:

To a computer, zero.


If you bust out the slide rule, you probably have to round up to 1.
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
30617 posts
Posted on 6/6/26 at 1:17 pm to
quote:

It doesn’t matter how many repeating 9’s you keep tacking on, there’s also always a zero at the end, because the number of potential digits is infinite, which means .99 repeating can never equal 1.


There is never a 0 at the end. .9 repeating equals 1, period. I don't like the algebraic "proofs" because they aren't really proofs.

I wrote out a simple proof, but Imgur isn't uploading correctly right now. I'll check back later.
Posted by KamaCausey_LSU
Member since Apr 2013
17741 posts
Posted on 6/6/26 at 1:38 pm to
quote:

I moved on to 2 already

Also known as 1+1/2+1/4+1/8+1/16+...
Posted by rltiger
Metairie
Member since Oct 2004
2501 posts
Posted on 6/6/26 at 1:58 pm to
fractions matter. .0233 of a second difference.
Posted by luvdoc
"Please Ignore Our Yelp Reviews"
Member since May 2005
1186 posts
Posted on 6/6/26 at 1:59 pm to
quote:

It doesn’t matter how many repeating 9’s you keep tacking on, there’s also always a zero at the end, because the number of potential digits is infinite, which means .99 repeating can never equal 1.


There's not a zero at the end if the 9s go on for Infinity

The Taylor series in Kama's post is another great introduction to the true concept of mathematical Infinity

If you stand one foot from a wall and every second take a step halfway toward the wall, how long does it take to reach the wall?

The brain teaser answer is "never", because you are always "only getting halfway there".

But if you truly take an infinite number of steps, it can be proven that the sum of your steps equals the original distance to the wall
Posted by Recognizable Poster
Geaux Tigers
Member since Mar 2026
665 posts
Posted on 6/6/26 at 2:00 pm to
I don't know why I opened this thread, but here I am...

First of all, I was told in no mistakable terms that there would be absolutely no math.

Secondly, the math just isn't mathing, brotato chip.

This post was edited on 6/6/26 at 2:01 pm
Posted by PhiTiger1764
Lurker since Aug 2003
Member since Oct 2009
14597 posts
Posted on 6/6/26 at 2:01 pm to
Yes it =1. It’s proven math. Your opinion does not matter.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram