Started By
Message

re: Jury Acquits Uvalde police officer who refused to engage with school shooter

Posted on 1/22/26 at 8:23 am to
Posted by Salviati
Member since Apr 2006
7724 posts
Posted on 1/22/26 at 8:23 am to
I know one cop who would have gone in.


Diehard LSU Fan Kills Terrorist - "We went in to win."
Posted by BottomlandBrew
Member since Aug 2010
29912 posts
Posted on 1/22/26 at 8:26 am to
A couple others were the first responders to the Covenant shooting in Nashville. They ran in and did the job without hesitation.
Posted by CatfishJohn
Member since Jun 2020
20344 posts
Posted on 1/22/26 at 8:37 am to
quote:

A couple others were the first responders to the Covenant shooting in Nashville. They ran in and did the job without hesitation.


Heroes of the highest order. That video is gut wrenching but awe inspiring at the same time.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
55605 posts
Posted on 1/22/26 at 8:42 am to
quote:

hopefully not a single one of us is ever in that position. And it's very easy to say that youd do it online, but none of us know how wed act in the moment. You can say, "of course id run in" but you do not know that.

I did run in. Turned out to be firecrackers. Not only did I go in, but so did my wife. Of course, my children were in that building, which is different.
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
21764 posts
Posted on 1/22/26 at 9:32 am to
quote:

Police aren’t military under the law. They can’t be ordered on a suicide mission. They also have no duty under the law to protect specific people. The Supreme Court has already ruled on this


Imagine having a job, raising your hand to swear an oath protect and serve your community, only to have no legal duty to do anything, and this job is well, completely optional. In the words of Office Space, "What is it exactly that you say you do here?".
Posted by Ostrich
Alexandria, VA
Member since Nov 2011
10343 posts
Posted on 1/22/26 at 9:42 am to
quote:

A couple others were the first responders to the Covenant shooting in Nashville. They ran in and did the job without hesitation.


Probably also speaks to the level of training and caliber of officers in Nashville, a major metro, versus Uvalde
Posted by guzziguy
Lake Forest
Member since Jun 2022
1000 posts
Posted on 1/22/26 at 10:13 am to
Security guards observe and report.
Police officers are supposed to stop the threat.

Fricking coward.
Posted by SemperFiDawg
Member since Sep 2014
4338 posts
Posted on 1/22/26 at 10:44 am to
Hard to convict a person for being a coward. Even in combat they just move you to an admin position if you don't have the guts to pull the trigger in battle. Now in Russia, you may be shot, but throughout our history there's been very , very few battlefield executions for cowardice. I have mixed feelings over this. Part of me says they should let the parents tear him limb for limb and another part of me says if it was me I'd rather be killed than having to live with myself knowing all those children's deaths were my fault, because I didn't act. I can't imagine anything worse than having to live with that.
Posted by LSUSUPERSTAR
TX
Member since Jan 2005
17007 posts
Posted on 1/22/26 at 11:56 am to
quote:

But is that illegal though


It would be one thing if he was trying to act and just took a little while to assess the situation. But my recollection is that he and others never tried to go in at all.
Posted by Barbellthor
Columbia
Member since Aug 2015
11295 posts
Posted on 1/22/26 at 12:41 pm to
quote:

Police aren’t military under the law. They can’t be ordered on a suicide mission. They also have no duty under the law to protect specific people. The Supreme Court has already ruled on this

Scalia wrote the majority opinion. I remember covering it in law school. Clarify, was that only protection from civil liability, though? If it were to extend to criminal liability, would not a motion have not been filed before trial to prevent the attempt to charhe the officer, or perhaps just appeal a conviction of he were convicted?

What doesn't make sense is that there is no criminal or civil liability for inaction by officers when they can ALSO prevent parents from going in to do their natural duty. Either officers have no affirmative duty to go into such a situation and thus cannot prevent parents from going OR they fricking go in.
Posted by Mayhem3524
Member since Sep 2025
248 posts
Posted on 1/22/26 at 1:04 pm to
I in no way want to defend their actions. But duty to act and requirement to act are two entirely different things. If you remember the deputy in Florida retired on the spot and refused to go in. Florida wanted to fry him and couldn’t. Their training has very little bearing because they are taught very early in their career to absolutely not assault a barricaded suspect, unless he turns back into an active shooter. Those things can go back and forth several times. Uniform guys and administrators are not nearly mentally equipped as a SWAT officer would be.
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
57898 posts
Posted on 1/22/26 at 1:06 pm to
quote:

I know everyone on here would say "yes id run in that building and stop the shooting at my own risk" but I doubt that there really many that really would. I like to think I would, too.


It's a bit different when it's a school. Especially if it's your kids in that school.
Posted by LSUDonMCO
Orlando
Member since Dec 2003
8709 posts
Posted on 1/22/26 at 1:08 pm to
Did they hand him a white feather for cowardice?
Posted by QC Reb
Charlotte
Member since Jun 2022
202 posts
Posted on 1/22/26 at 2:36 pm to
Reminds me of the lyrics:

I'm not a coward, I've just never been tested
I'd like to think that if I was I would pass
Look at the tested and think "There but for the grace go I"
Might be a coward, I'm afraid of what I might find out

Posted by Barbellthor
Columbia
Member since Aug 2015
11295 posts
Posted on 1/22/26 at 2:43 pm to
quote:

duty to act and requirement to act are two entirely different things

I don't know or recall what difference there is in the two, but there is still the issue I see where if there is no duty/ requirement to act, fine. Move so someone else can. The problem is government monopolizing action of individuals, such as FEMA disallowing individuals to render aids or supplies in the Carolina hurricane flooding but then not helping people their own selves.

What society will we have when individuals have given up their ability and expectation to protect themselves and provide for their communities, and they have given that role to government, and then that government refuses to act?

I cannot, legally or as a parent or as an American, reconcile a non obligation by law enforcement to go in there but prevent parents from going in, then not be held accountable. Thoughts.
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
21764 posts
Posted on 1/22/26 at 3:02 pm to
quote:

Hard to convict a person for being a coward.


I mean if this were the military he'd be at a very minimum NJP'd and possible administrative discharge, at worst court martialed for cowardice, desertion, and dereliction of duty.

Here, he gets to keep his badge, pay, pension, job, etc, for doing a job that's legally optional. Who thought this situation is a good idea?
Posted by riverdiver
Summerville SC
Member since May 2022
2991 posts
Posted on 1/22/26 at 3:38 pm to
quote:

I know everyone on here would say "yes id run in that building and stop the shooting at my own risk" but I doubt that there really many that really would. I like to think I would, too.


Every man is built different.

Pretty sure one of the Border Patrol guys who went in was getting a haircut, heard the news, borrowed a shotgun from the barber (yes, that really happened) and went in with the team that killed him.

While the entire Uvalde PD stood around joking and using hand sanitizer.
Posted by BabyTac
Austin, TX
Member since Jun 2008
16686 posts
Posted on 1/22/26 at 4:01 pm to
I mean should we really ruin a guys life who makes $25/hour for not eating a bullet for his job?
Posted by LemmyLives
Texas
Member since Mar 2019
16189 posts
Posted on 1/22/26 at 4:04 pm to
quote:

stop the murdering of innocent children.

you are greatly underestimating how the the human mind works (or doesn't) under stress. Almost everyone freezes, including during shootings. The animal in you does not want you to draw attention to yourself. The only way you override that is with drills and training, which is not something 99.5% of people are capable of.
Posted by LSU alum wannabe
Katy, TX
Member since Jan 2004
27793 posts
Posted on 1/22/26 at 7:43 pm to
quote:

He’s forever branded a coward.


That dumb bastard needs to move. I don’t know where. Far away and change his name. Uvalde isn’t the smallest town. It’s TINY for a pariah.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram