- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Help with riddle - How Much Money Did The Store Lose?
Posted on 12/10/23 at 11:43 pm to Seaux_cal_tiger
Posted on 12/10/23 at 11:43 pm to Seaux_cal_tiger
Subtle 'I have a job' brag
Posted on 12/10/23 at 11:49 pm to Seaux_cal_tiger
quote:
How much money did the store lose?
Since he gave the $100 back and the question is how much money it lost, I’d say the $30 in change they gave him. The $70 is goods stolen not money.
Posted on 12/10/23 at 11:50 pm to Seaux_cal_tiger
Unless his moms a Dr. then its an easy answer of $100
Posted on 12/10/23 at 11:50 pm to Seaux_cal_tiger
quote:
A man steals a $100 bill from a store’s cash register. Then he buys $70 worth of goods at the store using the $100 he stole and he gets $30 in change back. How much money did the store lose?
Depends what the markup on the goods he bought is. Value of goods bought by stolen money to the store is wholesale value since they retain the profit on the goods from the sale. Assume markup of 10%
63 dollars wholesale value of goods plus 30 in change, 93 dollars stolen. They kept the 7 dollar profit. But this is only if you know the guy who stole it bought goods with stolen money. If you don’t know these facts, it’s no different than if he stole 100 dollars and another customer came in and bought the same goods with a non stolen 100 dollar bill.
At the end of the day the cash register balance will be short 100 dollars
This post was edited on 12/10/23 at 11:55 pm
Posted on 12/11/23 at 12:01 am to Townedrunkard
quote:
The $70 is goods stolen not money.
They didn't get those goods for free.
Posted on 12/11/23 at 12:08 am to imjustafatkid
70 in goods and 30 in cash = 100 net loss. He put the 100 back so it's immaterial to the query.
Posted on 12/11/23 at 12:17 am to Seaux_cal_tiger
The thief walked away with $70 bucks worth of retail stuff and $30 cash while giving the store nothing.
The Store had $70 worth of retail goods and $30 worth of cash removed from it while getting nothing in return.
The Store had $70 worth of retail goods and $30 worth of cash removed from it while getting nothing in return.
Posted on 12/11/23 at 3:38 am to Joshjrn
quote:this was also my answer
From an accounting perspective, $30 plus the store’s cost of the item stolen. From a legal perspective, $100 total worth of cash and merchandise.
Posted on 12/11/23 at 3:49 am to Seaux_cal_tiger
The stores ESG score went up for not opposing the unplanned donation, thereby Blackrock lowered the rent on the owners house by 100 a month.
Its a sctatch.
Its a sctatch.
Posted on 12/11/23 at 5:42 am to Seaux_cal_tiger
Store lost 100
Then trades 70 for 100, so the store has now lost 70
Then gives back 30, so 70+30 = 100
Then trades 70 for 100, so the store has now lost 70
Then gives back 30, so 70+30 = 100
Posted on 12/11/23 at 6:26 am to Seaux_cal_tiger
The correct answer is $500 for insurance claim purposes.
Posted on 12/11/23 at 6:47 am to Seaux_cal_tiger
The horses name is Friday
Posted on 12/11/23 at 7:01 am to Joshjrn
quote:
From an accounting perspective, $30 plus the store’s cost of the item stolen. From a legal perspective, $100 total worth of cash and merchandise.
This plus 5 in labor for stocking and check out paid from money they already had in hand. Unless he used self checkout.
Posted on 12/11/23 at 7:02 am to Seaux_cal_tiger
The store lost $300.00.
1) The store lost the original $100 in cash
2) The store lost $70 worth of goods that was paid with the stolen money; therefore the store will not be able to sell the $70 worth of goods to someone that did not steal from them
3) The store then gave the thief $30 on top of that.
4) The store also has to re stock the $70.00 worth of items that the thief paid for with the stolen money.
1) The store lost the original $100 in cash
2) The store lost $70 worth of goods that was paid with the stolen money; therefore the store will not be able to sell the $70 worth of goods to someone that did not steal from them
3) The store then gave the thief $30 on top of that.
4) The store also has to re stock the $70.00 worth of items that the thief paid for with the stolen money.
This post was edited on 12/11/23 at 7:08 am
Posted on 12/11/23 at 7:04 am to Seaux_cal_tiger
$170
More or less, depending on their cost of goods stolen
More or less, depending on their cost of goods stolen
Posted on 12/11/23 at 7:07 am to Seaux_cal_tiger
Nothing, it was reparations
Posted on 12/11/23 at 7:08 am to Seaux_cal_tiger
$130
+100
-70
+70
+30
----
130
+100
-70
+70
+30
----
130
quote:The phrasing of question was $70 worth of good. Cost and markup should not be considered.
Whether the cost of goods sold should be considered has been then point of contention.
This post was edited on 12/11/23 at 7:12 am
Posted on 12/11/23 at 7:31 am to Joshjrn
quote:
, $30 plus the store’s cost of the item stolen
COGS has a new meaning

Posted on 12/11/23 at 7:35 am to Seaux_cal_tiger
Not enough info. Need to know the store’s cost of goods.
Without knowing that. The guy steals $100, gives $100 back, but receives $70 in goods plus $30.
The guy stole $100 overall, but the store lost the cost of goods plus $30, so in reality, it is somewhere less than $100.
Without knowing that. The guy steals $100, gives $100 back, but receives $70 in goods plus $30.
The guy stole $100 overall, but the store lost the cost of goods plus $30, so in reality, it is somewhere less than $100.
This post was edited on 12/11/23 at 1:21 pm
Posted on 12/11/23 at 7:41 am to Seaux_cal_tiger
1. Stole $100. $100 lost.
2. With a retail 30% markup on goods for resale, purchased wholesale, $70 stolen dollars are used to purchase goods with a $21 markup and a wholesale cost of $49, totaling $70. $70 lost.
$170 loss
2. With a retail 30% markup on goods for resale, purchased wholesale, $70 stolen dollars are used to purchase goods with a $21 markup and a wholesale cost of $49, totaling $70. $70 lost.
$170 loss
Popular
Back to top
