Started By
Message

re: Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) ***W.H.O. DECLARES A GLOBAL PANDEMIC***

Posted on 3/27/20 at 10:25 am to
Posted by SabiDojo
Open to any suggestions.
Member since Nov 2010
84435 posts
Posted on 3/27/20 at 10:25 am to
quote:

I should have brushed up on that old report. I thought their high end estimate for the US was 1.6 million


And that was with MITIGATION, not suppression.
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
41093 posts
Posted on 3/27/20 at 10:28 am to
quote:

Neil Ferguson has now clarified his statement which was misinterpreted. Here is the clarification.


Thanks.


It's too bad so many posters took the summarization of his statements by a NYT contributor as gospel. Sad to see.
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 3/27/20 at 10:30 am to
quote:

NYT


Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
52222 posts
Posted on 3/27/20 at 10:34 am to
quote:

Thanks.


It's too bad so many posters took the summarization of his statements by a NYT contributor as gospel. Sad to see.


So his 500k initial estimate, which he's admitted isn't going to happen, is gospel again?
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
41093 posts
Posted on 3/27/20 at 10:35 am to
Nope. Nothing in this situation is gospel.
Posted by OldManRiver
Prairieville, LA
Member since Jan 2005
7576 posts
Posted on 3/27/20 at 10:39 am to
quote:

It's too bad so many posters took the summarization of his statements by a NYT contributor as gospel. Sad to see.

His own paper contradicts this
quote:

In the (unlikely) absence of any control measures or spontaneous changes in individual behaviour, we
would expect a peak in mortality (daily deaths) to occur after approximately 3 months (Figure 1A)... In total, in an
unmitigated epidemic, we would predict approximately 510,000 deaths in GB and 2.2 million in the
US
, not accounting for the potential negative effects of health systems being overwhelmed on
mortality.

Ok, fine, if we do absolutely nothing it will kill a ton of people. Makes sense. But later on, he talks about what mitigation will accomplish
quote:

Conditional on that duration, the most effective
combination of interventions is predicted to be a combination of case isolation, home quarantine and
social distancing of those most at risk (the over 70s)
. Whilst the latter has relatively less impact on
transmission than other age groups, reducing morbidity and mortality in the highest risk groups
reduces both demand on critical care and overall mortality. In combination, this intervention strategy
is predicted to reduce peak critical care demand by two-thirds and halve the number of deaths
.
However, this “optimal” mitigation scenario would still result in an 8-fold higher peak demand on
critical care beds over and above the available surge capacity in both GB and the US.

So the most effective combo would 1/2 deaths, which in the UK would mean 250,000. Yet he's now at 20,000? Nowhere in this paper is that type of decrease even remotely hinted at

Original Study
Posted by Teddy Ruxpin
Member since Oct 2006
40863 posts
Posted on 3/27/20 at 10:43 am to
quote:

I’m from Ohio and went to school there; my wife is from Hurley, MS and we have family in escatawpa/gautier/moss point.

As a consequence I’ve spent a bit of time on that particular stretch of the coast.



Ya, I was going to say not many people get out of Escatawpa to go to college, much less Ohio St.

Neat connection.
Posted by lakeviewtiger
BC
Member since Jul 2005
2451 posts
Posted on 3/27/20 at 10:48 am to
What happens first...this thread reaches 1000 pages or the curve flattens in Louisiana?
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 3/27/20 at 10:54 am to
quote:

What happens first...this thread reaches 1000 pages or the curve flattens in Louisiana?



Just because the number of people testing positive doubles basically every day doesn't mean twice as many people are contracting it every day.

We'll likely never know the true curve, but I'm sure if we did, we would see this helping. Do you not think it is helping?
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
179012 posts
Posted on 3/27/20 at 10:56 am to
another death in st. tammany parish last night.

hospitalized since early mid march, numerous other underlying conditions etc.
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
41093 posts
Posted on 3/27/20 at 10:58 am to
quote:

Conditional on that duration, the most effective
combination of interventions is predicted to be a combination of case isolation, home quarantine and
social distancing of those most at risk (the over 70s). Whilst the latter has relatively less impact on
transmission than other age groups, reducing morbidity and mortality in the highest risk groups
reduces both demand on critical care and overall mortality. In combination, this intervention strategy
is predicted to reduce peak critical care demand by two-thirds and halve the number of deaths.


I think you are misunderstanding what he saying here. He is saying that a MITIGATION strategy, which is basically "quarantine the olds and let everyone else go about their lives" could result in those numbers.

I believe he is now saying that the SUPPRESSION strategy, which is what countries are actually doing, everyone social distancing, everyone shelter in place, only essential businesses being open could result in that 20k number.


SK was able to effectively do a mitigation strategy because they got way out in front on testing. The rest of the world isn't there yet, but the US is working hard to get there.
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
52222 posts
Posted on 3/27/20 at 11:08 am to
This guy is also now saying that the virus is more transmissible than originally projected, while also saying the mortality rate is exactly the same.

That doesn't track, at all.
Posted by MikeD
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2004
8446 posts
Posted on 3/27/20 at 11:30 am to
quote:

He was recommending to the UK government that they implement these mass shutdowns for swine flu...


So sounds like he will be the Chicken Little go-to for future pandemics.
Posted by MikeD
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2004
8446 posts
Posted on 3/27/20 at 11:32 am to
quote:

1000 pages
Posted by barry
Location, Location, Location
Member since Aug 2006
51397 posts
Posted on 3/27/20 at 11:37 am to
quote:

What happens first...this thread reaches 1000 pages or the curve flattens in Louisiana?


Between the average of 5-7 days for symptoms to show and 3-5 days for testing results, you are talking an easy 10 day lag in cases reported for any action you may implement.
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
87374 posts
Posted on 3/27/20 at 11:52 am to
Holy shite Italy

WTF
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
41093 posts
Posted on 3/27/20 at 11:52 am to
New cases going down for Italy which is good - 5,909 new cases.


Deadliest day so far though - 919 new deaths
Posted by GeauxTigers2020
Member since Sep 2013
28667 posts
Posted on 3/27/20 at 11:53 am to
quote:

Metro Public Health Department officials announced today a total number of 312 confirmed cases of coronavirus (COVID-19) in Nashville/Davidson County, an increase of 20 cases in the past 24 hours. The ages of confirmed cases range from two months to 84 years. A second patient, a 67-year-old man who had underlying health conditions, has died after a confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis. Twelve (12) other patients remain hospitalized. Fifty-five (55) people have recovered from the virus. The remaining cases are self-isolating at home and have mild and manageable symptoms.

Total number of Cases: 312
Number of Cases confirmed today: 20

Cases by sex
Male: 153
Female: 155
Unknown: 4


Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
85102 posts
Posted on 3/27/20 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

Deadliest day so far though - 919 new deaths


Someone posted this could be due to backlog testing... whereas they died days or weeks ago and the results just now came back.
This post was edited on 3/27/20 at 12:03 pm
Posted by reedus23
St. Louis
Member since Sep 2011
25492 posts
Posted on 3/27/20 at 12:14 pm to
It's all relative. Every day has back log testing. So every day is counting deaths from days or weeks ago. Making it the deadliest day so far still. Unless, of course, one is conveniently saying that reporting for every other day was reporting only that day's deaths.

And I have no idea if the numbers are correct or what is the biggest. Just pointing out the problem with the logic.
Jump to page
Page First 932 933 934 935 936 ... 1190
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 934 of 1190Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram