Started By
Message

re: Game of Thrones S8E5 "The Bells" is officially the worst reviewed GOT episode yet

Posted on 5/14/19 at 12:42 pm to
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35381 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 12:42 pm to
quote:

The character arc across seasons 5-7 was actually reducing her ruthless nature, not the other way around.
Season 6 is when Tyrion had to stop her from reducing Mereen to ashes, and brought the similarities with her father wanting to burn King's Landing to the ground. And even then she said it was "different" even though Tyrion rightfully pointed out that "burning one city to the ground is not that different from burning another city to the ground."

Not only did this show us a willingness to do what she just did, that even when presented with how reprehensible the result of it would be, she try to rationalize that it was somehow different it was with her, presumably because she believed that her genocidal ideations had some justifiable basis despite still being genocide.

The fact that it was Tyrion who tried to stop her again, after he LOST HER TRUST, is important too. They already showed her willingness; this time she didn't trust the same person to retrain that. Not to mention they made the Dickon murder a major point in not only last season, but this season as well. She was already acting towards that willingness.
This post was edited on 5/14/19 at 12:45 pm
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
52225 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 12:44 pm to
quote:

Season 6 is when Tyrion had to stop her from reducing Mereen to ashes, and brought the similarities with her father wanting to burn King's Landing to the ground. And even then she said it was "different" even though Tyrion rightfully pointed out that "burning one city to the ground is not that different from burning another city to the ground."


So she goes from this to offering mercy to all opposing soldiers? Like I said, her arc was heading down the benevolent path, not the homicidal one.

This is actually why the #WomanPower movement is so pissed. Dany was supposed to be their saving grace. Now she's just another crazy bitch trying to kill everyone.
This post was edited on 5/14/19 at 12:46 pm
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
79448 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 12:46 pm to
Literally all her advisors did was advise her not to just burn everything to the ground to get what she wants.

Dany isn’t a leader she just had dragons.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477219 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 12:46 pm to
quote:

Now she's just another crazy bitch trying to kill everyone.

After she didn't get dicked down
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
61476 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 12:48 pm to
quote:

Killing two opposing leaders fell in line with her character, Kings Landing did not.


Yes. Yes it did. She had to be talked out of burning down two other cities in Essos. She threatened to burn down Qarth just b/c they were wary of letting a bunch of savage arse Dothraki into their city. She gives no fricks when her brother is killed via melted gold. She murdered all the other Khals b/c they didn't bow down to her. She killed multiple innocent masters and nobles in Meereen (via crucifixion and dragon) against the advice of Barristan Selmy turning the entirety of the Meereen elites against her. She forces a man to either marry her or die via dragon. She constantly doles out punishment that is based on revenge and not justice or mercy. She says she is there to break the wheel yet if you don't immediately fall in line she considers you an enemy who must be put down. (and that ain't breaking the wheel)

She is completely focused on taking the Iron Throne b/c she believes it to be her birthright even though she has never even been to Westeros and has made zero effort to understand the various customs, alliances, and history. She has always had a quick temper and gets very upset when people disagree with her. She constantly demands people who have never seen her and have zero reason to follow her to bend the knee or die.

She is impetuous and impatient, seems to have no real interest in the actual day to day minutia a ruler must deal with, either doesn't understand or doesn't care that you need to play politics as a ruler thinking her decrees should be the end all be all, thinks if a person fails her wishes or gives advice that doesn't work out it's a sign of treachery, doesn't ever bother to set up up a political structure to replace the ones she destroys, can't comprehend why people don't automatically love her, and treats anyone who doesn't immediately kiss her arse like shite. Ever since she got her dragons her default has been "join me or die" never trying diplomacy first.

Now she is in a place where two of her "children" are dead, she isn't given credit for killing the Night King, her closest thing to a father figure (a guy she once banished under pain of death) is dead, her closest friend and advisor was beheaded in front of her, the man she has fallen in love with has rejected her. Oh and by the way he actually has the better claim to the throne and everyone he comes into contact with loves him and is willing to die for him while nearly everyone she meets in Westeros looks at her with distrust and disdain. She doesn't view the citizens of KL as innocents purely b/c they don't rise up and take down Cersei for her.

She was already difficult to wrangle by her various advisors when things were going right. Now that they are all gone and she has encountered true losses her worst traits have all taken over. This was not sudden. This was not out of nowhere. She always had Targaryen traits that the elites following her hoped she would grow out of as she got older and more experienced. They were all wrong and this could be seen coming from a mile away. A lot of people just missed it b/c they aren't used to a story that follows the journey of and humanizes a person (a pretty, innocent looking, waif of a girl who had a hard upbringing no less) who ends up being a villain.
This post was edited on 5/14/19 at 12:51 pm
Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
42451 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 12:49 pm to
quote:

I've literally sat here and acknowledged every single one of them. What I don't acknowledge is the claim that the leap she made from slightly ruthless to homicidal maniac makes sense in the timeframe it was presented to have happened.


She was already slightly ruthless. So it wasnt a jump from compassionate all caring person to maniac. It was a jump from a form of ruthless to maniac.

Posted by 615tider
sidewalk in TN
Member since Oct 2012
3855 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 12:49 pm to
quote:

Dany isn’t a leader she just had dragons.
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
52225 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 12:50 pm to
quote:

She was already slightly ruthless


I know. I've said this over and over again.

quote:

So it wasnt a jump from compassionate all caring person to maniac.


No one has said this.

quote:

It was a jump from a form of ruthless to maniac.


That's still a massive leap in 1.5 episodes.
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35381 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 12:50 pm to
quote:

So she goes from this to offering mercy to all opposing soldiers?

No. Here is her exact quote from the Battle of the Bastards episode:
quote:

I will crucify the masters, I will set their fleets on fire, kill every last one of their soldiers, and return their cities to the dirt.
So she said she would:

1. Crucify the masters.
2. Set their fleets on fire.
3. Kill every last one of their soldiers.
4. Return their cities to dirt.

And what did she do in the last episode? Literally every single one of those except she just killed the one "master," if we are considering Cersei the master. But she didn't really have a chance to crucify her.
This post was edited on 5/14/19 at 12:53 pm
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
52225 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 12:53 pm to
quote:

buckeye_vol


How many times does it have to be explained that her ending up where she did is not the issue? It's the ridiculous pace that they tried to do it in that is the problem.

She went from fighting for the living to killing everyone in a matter of 2 episodes.

Seriously dude. You're making points against something that no one is arguing.

ETA: The descent should have began, at latest, when her first dragon was killed. It didn't though. It didn't start until episode 4 of a 6 episode final season.
This post was edited on 5/14/19 at 12:58 pm
Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
42451 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 12:53 pm to
quote:

So she said she would:

1. Crucify the masters.
2. Set their fleets on fire.
3. Kill everyone of their soldiers.


"and they should know who to blame when the sky falls down upon them"
Posted by Adam Banks
District 5
Member since Sep 2009
37807 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 12:56 pm to
quote:

So she goes from this to offering mercy to all opposing soldiers



And then when they don’t go to fight for a foreign invader she burns them all alive including the high born Tarlys despite recommendations from her advisors not to. It’s made clear that this sort of thing is WAY outside the norm in the books. It is 100% “known” and expected that at most Ned would get sent to the wall if not kept imprisoned. The Greyjoy’s were sent back to the iron Islands and Theon raised by the starks. They weren’t executed unarmed.
Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
42451 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 12:56 pm to
quote:

It was a jump from a form of ruthless to maniac.


That's still a massive leap in 1.5 episodes.




Yes. Yes it is. I was never trying to argue that what she did was a massive leap. You're saying it happened too fast, im trying to say that even though it was a big leap, its been building up longer than you're making it out to be and its not surprising.
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
61476 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 12:57 pm to
quote:

She went from fighting for the living to killing everyone in a matter of 2 episodes.


She wasn't fighting for the living. She was fighting for the Iron Throne. If she doesn't take care of the Night King and get the armies of the North behind her she doesn't get the throne.
This post was edited on 5/14/19 at 12:57 pm
Posted by Sasquatch Smash
Member since Nov 2007
25919 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 12:59 pm to
quote:

After she didn't get dicked down


The only things she's ever known how to use to get what she wants is her pussy and her dragons. Her pussy failed her, so she had to resort to her dragon.





In regards to some of the other things that have been posted since I last replied in here, not directed at this post or necessarily you:


To borrow some terminology/mechanics from White Wolf's World of Darkness RPGs, her Nature has always been that of a mad tyrant yet her Demeanor has been that of a caretaker.
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35381 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 1:00 pm to
quote:

How many times does it have to be explained that her ending up where she did is not the issue? It's the ridiculous pace that they tried to do it in that is the problem.
But 2 seasons ago, she was on the verge of doing the exact thing that she did, that didn't even serve her ultimate goal (rule Westeros). The thing that stopped her was a trusted adviser.

But it's suddenly abrupt when she actually goes through with that same thing, that served her ultimate goal, and without a trusted adviser her to stop her, not to mention all that had happened and all that she had done before that?
quote:

ETA: The descent should have began, at latest, when her first dragon was killed.
I mean maybe it did. It was the first time she really lost some invincibility and resulted in a sudden change of strategy because her ultimate goal had a major roadblock.

But at the same time, you're framing it as a descent, as if she is truly insane. If anything she was slowly descending into the worst of what she already was and the loss of a dragon alone wouldn't have made that obvious. But it was cumulative impact of losing all of the things restraining her worst that led to this place. She wasn't descending into something she was just losing the restraints of that thing that was already present.
This post was edited on 5/14/19 at 1:09 pm
Posted by monsterballads
Gulf of America
Member since Jun 2013
31513 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 1:00 pm to
quote:

her arc was heading down the benevolent path, not the homicidal one.


uh, no. her arc was her getting closer and closer to the throne, day by day. she was getting power hungry and no one would stand in her way to her achieving her goals. she's always had it in her. she just finally went full villain and stopped pretending to be this great and wonderful leader that was going to save everyone.
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
52225 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 1:01 pm to
quote:

Yes. Yes it is. I was never trying to argue that what she did was a massive leap. You're saying it happened too fast, im trying to say that even though it was a big leap, its been building up longer than you're making it out to be and its not surprising.


I said it's been building up since season 1. That her going mad queen was one of a handful of likely outcomes.

You and buckeye have both been arguing against a point that was never even made.
Posted by RollTide1987
Baltimore, MD
Member since Nov 2009
71159 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 1:01 pm to
quote:

Crucifying 100+ people. Just because they did it also doesn’t mean it’s not insane. As I mentioned her reasonable advisors advised her not to. She chose the psychotic route.


Others would call it justice. In Old Testament times it was known as "an eye for an eye." Cruel? Yes. Psychotic? No. It also highlights my point that she only does cruel shite when someone has personally wronged her or wronged her people.

quote:

They are running towards the red keep not fleeing the city to her forces or turning on Cersei. They are trying to get closer to Cersei.


It might be because Cersei has told all of Westeros that Dany was here to burn them all alive with her dragons. It's called propaganda. Take King's Landing, seize the Iron Throne, rule justly, and the people will learn to love you. That's all she had to do. Instead, she went completely against character and that's why people are complaining.
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
79448 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 1:03 pm to
quote:

Others would call it justice. In Old Testament times it was known as "an eye for an eye." Cruel? Yes. Psychotic? No. It also highlights my point that she only does cruel shite when someone has personally wronged her or wronged her people.


They made a point that not everyone she crucified was responsible.

It’s an eye for an eye not an eye for any other eye.
This post was edited on 5/14/19 at 1:04 pm
Jump to page
Page First 15 16 17 18 19 ... 43
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 17 of 43Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram