Started By
Message

re: NHL expansion to Texas??

Posted on 6/24/26 at 8:07 pm to
Posted by chinese58
NELA. after 30 years in Dallas.
Member since Jun 2004
33947 posts
Posted on 6/24/26 at 8:07 pm to
quote:

have no idea why the NHL needs expansion. A 34-team league is going to be so watered down.
I feel like it's already watered down enough to hurt every team's depth. Not enough super-talented players to stay a contender with a couple of injuries. Just think how good your team would be with your worst player gone and one more superstar added to the roster.

quote:

NHL expansion to Texas??
#TexasHockey
This post was edited on 6/24/26 at 8:18 pm
Posted by SenorJuan
NYC
Member since May 2026
58 posts
Posted on 6/24/26 at 11:56 pm to
Texas has thriving club hockey programs via the ACHA.

In the state of texas alone you have colllege club teams that are funded by alumni.

UT, Texas Tech, Texas A&M, U Houston, DBU, North Texas, SMU, East Texas Baptist, Rice and UTSA.
Posted by RoyalAir
Detroit
Member since Dec 2012
7760 posts
Posted on 6/25/26 at 4:23 am to
quote:



Jets owners make a frickload of money from all the surrounding property. Senators are working to get a new arena in downtown Ottawa. Neither are going anywhere. They may never win a Stanley Cup. But that doesn't mean they won't turn a profit.




The Jets owner doesn't need the Jets to make money. He's the richest guy in Canada. I am curious about the overall economic feasibility of the Jets, however. Winnipeg is tiny, easily the smallest market in a major 4 sports league, with very little corporate presence. It has the smallest arena in the NHL- a notoriously gate- driven league. To your point, it's not likely to be competitive for a championship, as free agents do not sign there.

The Senators have had sustained success, albeit 20 years ago. I just don't see how the Winnipeg experiment is a successful venture.

Posted by saturdaysarebetter
Pennsylvania
Member since Jul 2018
79 posts
Posted on 6/25/26 at 8:20 am to
Houston's a no-brainer with their minor league hockey and WHA history and being the fifth-largest metro population in the country. Austin surprised me but then it has a larger metro population than Columbus and Pittsburgh which have NHL franchises.
Posted by ShaneTheLegLechler
Member since Dec 2011
63709 posts
Posted on 6/25/26 at 8:25 am to
I think it would do great in Austin as the first and solitary major pro sports franchise and the excitement that would surround it. The Friedkins are Houston people and my guess is they want to make it work here first, but if they can’t get an arena done then Austin is the backup option

As a Houston resident I will selfishly be fricking pissed if it goes to Austin
This post was edited on 6/25/26 at 8:26 am
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
55317 posts
Posted on 6/25/26 at 8:44 am to
quote:

I liken it to the MLB expanding in the 90’s and not taking into account the amount of transplants were in cities like Tampa. People moved there already being life long fans of the Yankees or Mets. There’s a ton of people from Louisiana here but no ones switching to the Texans from the Saints just because they’re local.


The idea is their kids will make that switch…
Posted by Tigeralum2008
Yankees Fan
Member since Apr 2012
17750 posts
Posted on 6/25/26 at 9:29 am to
quote:

I think it would do great in Austin as the first and solitary major pro sports franchise and the excitement that would surround it.


Raleigh and Columbus have proven the model can be successful. Why compete with the Big 3 sports for attention when you can have Austin to yourself from January to June? UTexas baseball and basketball are "big" but won't draw the non-UT fans away from hockey.
This post was edited on 6/25/26 at 9:30 am
Posted by RoyalAir
Detroit
Member since Dec 2012
7760 posts
Posted on 6/25/26 at 10:03 am to
quote:

Raleigh and Columbus have proven the model can be successful. Why compete with the Big 3 sports for attention when you can have Austin to yourself from January to June?


You can expand this, as well, to smaller markets without a basketball team. Nashville, Buffalo, Pittsburgh, St Louis, San Jose. All have been very successful at the gate.

When the NHL shares an NBA building, with the NBA tenant being a different owner, is when they come into conflict. Salt Lake has NHL and NBA, but one guy owns both, and it's kind of the exception that proves the rule.

Austin makes a lot of sense. The NHL has been successful being the first to market .
Posted by nola tiger lsu
Member since Nov 2007
7522 posts
Posted on 6/25/26 at 1:49 pm to
quote:

Austin makes a lot of sense


It doesnt
Posted by BeachDude022
Premium Elite Platinum TD Member
Member since Dec 2006
36579 posts
Posted on 6/25/26 at 1:52 pm to
quote:

The point being is to get kids playing so they become invested in the local NHL team.


They have the Aeros travel team for the kids already. They could easily build that up if a NHL team came to town
Posted by AGGIES
Member since Jul 2021
13067 posts
Posted on 6/25/26 at 3:54 pm to
Houston has been in the conversation for years. Austin only being mentioned within the past couple of days.

Conventional wisdom tells me Austin is being used as leverage to get as much as possible from the Houston people.
Posted by CRDNLSCHMCPSN11
Member since Dec 2014
18484 posts
Posted on 6/26/26 at 2:08 am to
Jets had respectable attendance despite being out of the playoff picture all year. The league just signed a Canadian TV deal 2.5 times the previous contract a year ago. They do have trouble signing stars, but they did manage to resign 2 of their best players not that long ago. The league knows it will make far more in expansion fees than moving teams. Unless attendance significantly drops for the next several years, I don't see them leaving.
Posted by RoyalAir
Detroit
Member since Dec 2012
7760 posts
Posted on 6/26/26 at 8:39 am to
quote:

Jets had respectable attendance despite being out of the playoff picture all year.


They did. But they also have the smallest arena in the NHL, that cannot be expanded.

Population growth and corporate support isn't on Winnipeg's side. It's a metro the size of Knoxville, and doesn't have a Pilot/Flying J as a major corporate engine. It's also a largely blue collar town, so it's going to be hit by recessions harder than, say, Vancouver or Toronto. And Canada, as a country, is in bad shape from a longterm economic outlook.

I'm not saying Winnipeg is in danger of relocation. They have a deep-pocketed owner. But the town itself is a difficult spot to support a Big 4 sports franchise long-term.
Posted by Paul Allen
Montauk, NY
Member since Nov 2007
78638 posts
Posted on 6/27/26 at 8:09 am to
Edmonton also seems like a smaller market like Winnipeg
Posted by RoyalAir
Detroit
Member since Dec 2012
7760 posts
Posted on 6/27/26 at 8:50 am to
quote:

Edmonton also seems like a smaller market like Winnipeg


It is, but Alberta as a province is wealthy, and resource-rich. Edmonton was also in danger of relocation for years until their new arena was built, and McJesus was gifted to them. Edmonton also has the same issue that WPG does in that it cannot attract free agents. Chris Pronger famously did all in his power to bail out after one great year.


Manitoba has all of these problems, but it's significantly poorer than Alberta. With no McJesus and no tradition of winning.
Posted by LSUneaux
Metairie and MAGA AF
Member since Mar 2014
5040 posts
Posted on 6/27/26 at 12:42 pm to
quote:

Edmonton also seems like a smaller market like Winnipeg


What are y’all talking about?

Edmonton is considerably larger than Winnipeg, with a metropolitan population of approximately 1.5 million people compared to Winnipeg’s metro population of roughly 835,000 to 855,000.

Metro Winnipeg and Metro Baton Rouge are very similar in total metropolitan size, but they distribute their populations in completely opposite ways. Metro Winnipeg holds a population of roughly 855,000 to 865,000, while the Baton Rouge Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) is slightly larger at approximately 880,000 to 888,000.

Jacksonville, FL (~1.65 million)
Raleigh-Cary, NC (~1.55 million)
Milwaukee-Waukesha, WI (~1.54 million)
Edmonton, AB (~1.54 million)
New Orleans, LA (~1.2 million)
This post was edited on 6/27/26 at 12:44 pm
Posted by Buckeye Fan 19
Member since Dec 2007
36725 posts
Posted on 6/28/26 at 9:30 am to
quote:

The Jets owner doesn't need the Jets to make money. He's the richest guy in Canada. I am curious about the overall economic feasibility of the Jets, however. Winnipeg is tiny, easily the smallest market in a major 4 sports league, with very little corporate presence. It has the smallest arena in the NHL- a notoriously gate- driven league. To your point, it's not likely to be competitive for a championship, as free agents do not sign there.


As you alluded, I think Winnipeg is being propped up a bit by a minority owner who doesn’t really care if he loses money on the Jets. I do think they’re in danger if David Thomson / his family end up choosing they want out at some point, although I think the league would really like to try to avoid another Winnipeg relocation, if at all possible.

I think the other 31 franchises in the league are in a healthy-enough position at this point in time, although Ottawa probably does need to get downtown relatively quickly.
Posted by real turf fan
East Tennessee
Member since Dec 2016
12175 posts
Posted on 6/28/26 at 10:10 am to
When Houston had a pro ice hockey team, they played (IIRC) inside the loop just off southwest freeway. Traffic was bad and for some reason people would drive to watch pro Basketball there, but not ice hockey. Even though the team had true ice hockey royalty, the Howes, playing for them.
Posted by 18handicap
Member since Jul 2014
6589 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 10:39 am to
You're talking about The Summit, aka Compaq Center, and now Lakewood Church. I used to go to a lot of Aeros games back then and there were plenty of games with a full house. I also remember going up there with some of my HS teammates to watch the Rockets and get there near halftime and we could sit wherever we wanted.

I lived in Sugar Land and Southwest Freeway wasnt that bad. Problem with the Aeros was that we were in the WHA and not NHL. When the merger happened, our owner said if we sold a certain amount of season tickets, he would move us to NHL. Houston fans bought more than that number, but that owner changed his mind and that burnt a lot of the fans back then.
This post was edited on 6/29/26 at 10:42 am
Posted by SenorJuan
NYC
Member since May 2026
58 posts
Posted on 6/30/26 at 12:20 am to
Apparently it’s not Tillman doing it. Pretty sure it’s well known that he balked at the NHL franchise fee.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram