Favorite team:Notre Dame 
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:36156
Registered on:12/6/2007
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
I think Purdue-UConn would/will beat Iowa-South Carolina. I’m not sure about Purdue-Bama or UConn-NC State. I think Iowa-South Carolina would beat Bama-NC State, which it’s kind of unfathomable as of as recently as 13 months ago that that’s even remotely plausible....
In the ACC semis, UVA had an 85% free throw shooter going to the line for a one-and-one with about 5 seconds left up 58-55. Just crazy....
Nantz and Eagle are both very good and professional, but neither shines when it comes to buzzer beaters, late-game craziness, etc. Harlan’s voice was made for the chaos of March. Wish he would’ve been chosen instead of Eagle to replace Nantz on CBS’s #1 cbb team....
[quote]The dick sucking of this dude....[/quote] In 2023, he was 21st out of 41 qualifying QBs according to PFF, 23rd in QBR, 21st in AY/A (which doesn’t factor in any rushing stats at all, including scrambles), 23rd in EPA/dropback (which doesn’t factor in designed runs)… it’s not sucking his di...
[quote] He’ll do ok the first 7/8 games until NFL teams get film. Then he’ll decline as they will take away his scrambles and force him to pass which will lead to errors. His instinct is to run with any pressure. In NFL qbs always get pressure often, so thats where he’ll have to change his instinct....
[quote]10-28 as a starter. Garbage![/quote] To be fair to Fields, he was a rookie in 2021 and was Dalton’s backup at the start of the year/wasn’t supposed to start as many games as he did on what was a rebuilding/bad team, but Dalton ended up injured for a decent chunk. The 2022 roster was h...
[quote]I thought the Chiefs’ punter did a hell of a job in the playoffs[/quote] Townsend was First Team All Pro last season. He’s a very good - great punter. But they probably think they can get similar results with Araiza (and/or perhaps their analytics team/front office doesn’t see much marg...

re: Bet question for the day..

Posted by Buckeye Fan 19 on 2/6/24 at 8:36 pm
$250 AF spread $100 AF ML $600 profit (after factoring in initial $50 bet) if SDSU covers. $100 profit if SDSU wins by single digits. I’m guessing probably around $500-600 profit if AF wins without knowing exact ML, just based on the spread. ...
Seems more like gamesmanship by all three more than anything to me (and I don’t think Tucker is completely innocent either in this). Definitely beyond just “messing” but I also doubt any of the three would say it’s a very big deal or be extremely offended either....
Was the graphic off? Said TB still has a timeout…...
This is why I think it’ll be Norvell. First, he has a pretty low buyout, especially compared to Lanning. But more importantly, I’m not sure if the market is as available to Alabama as many might think, because the pressure/expectations of directly following Saban are going to be astronomical. Heaven...
[quote]That would be an insane way to make this important of a decision but it’s the Bears so I’m not ruling it out.[/quote] I don’t disagree, but we know how much the McCaskeys hate the Pack. For the record I’m a Bears fan (and haven’t been an OSU fan for nearly 15 years despite my username, ...
Whether fair or not, it feels a bit like he’s playing for his job Sunday. If he replicates his performance from this past week, I think he’s back and they try to get the Pats/Commanders in a bidding war and take MHJ at 2/3. If his performance is closer to the Cleveland game, I think they move on....
[quote]Entering today, the largest win ever against a team ranked in the AP top five at the time of the game was No. 1 Army 59, No. 5 Notre Dame 0 in 1944 (*Yes all obvious caveats about Florida State missing half its team apply)[/quote] [link=(https://twitter.com/MattBrownCFB/status/1741252...
[quote] It’s March Madness then whatever you want to put at a DISTANT 2nd.[/quote] March Madness is one of the worst ways to crown the best team as champion (which is different than “most entertaining.”) Only MLB (new format) is definitely worse, and possibly NHL....

re: Various Bowl Matchup Thread

Posted by Buckeye Fan 19 on 12/3/23 at 2:20 pm
[quote]True on all accounts[/quote] Yeah, and as I added late to that post, Northwestern is also 7-5 and has H2H over both Wisconsin and Maryland. But they’re also the least appealing from fanbase/TV....

re: Various Bowl Matchup Thread

Posted by Buckeye Fan 19 on 12/3/23 at 2:17 pm
[quote]Maryland at 7-5 is probably more likely. Can't see the bowl folks in Tampa wanting a 6-6 Wisconsin. Northwestern is another option at 7-5. Maryland hasn't ever been there. Big 10 is big on this if possible.[/quote] Wisconsin is also 7-5 but I think Maryland’s program might be more excite...

re: Various Bowl Matchup Thread

Posted by Buckeye Fan 19 on 12/3/23 at 2:12 pm
That’d be my guess. Or Maryland....

re: Various Bowl Matchup Thread

Posted by Buckeye Fan 19 on 12/3/23 at 2:11 pm
Wont be LSU-ND. Because the Orange is an SEC spot instead of B1G (this was unexpected prior to Bama’s upset over UGA), the Reliaquest is B1G instead of ACC....
Lanning maybe should’ve declined the penalty. Would’ve been 2nd-and-4 instead of 1st-and-20, but would’ve been a free timeout, instead of putting it back to 1st down....