Favorite team:Notre Dame 
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:36850
Registered on:12/6/2007
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
They wouldn’t need OL help at #1 overall long-term, presuming both Slater and Alt don’t have career-altering injuries. Both are out right now so it appears to be a mess, but it’s not if they’re both not compromised long-term.

Jeremiah Smith would probably make sense (Chargers passed on Nabers for Alt, so that pick would essentially be filling that vacancy), or trade down to a team that’s desperate for a QB. There’s not a QB in this class that’s definitively better than Herbert.
quote:

Did McAuley also note the clock didn’t even run in one of ND’s plays earlier in the drive with 40 seconds left. That would have not even allowed the play they actually got.


You are wrong on this, as pointed out in the other thread. The clock was reset to 45 seconds before that play, because BYU called the TO with 45 secs but it ran down to 40. The next play then took 5 seconds, and it was back at 40, correctly.

ND was worse than BYU last night anyway and would’ve had like a 10% chance of scoring from the 9 with an extra second, but you keep incorrectly making this inaccurate point.
quote:

Right before that the ref announced to reset the clock to 45 seconds. Tv didn’t adjust that and instead kept the clock at 40 seconds and simply didn’t run it for 5 seconds


I actually saw TV reset it to 45 but it was as the teams were heading back on the field after the timeout, much later than it’s normally reset. They never showed the ref announce it and you couldn’t hear the ref say anything in the background over the crowd and/or Fowler/Herbie.

I had initially noticed at least three seconds went off (I saw the ref motioning his arms at 43, before the clock stopped at 40), but I guess it was actually at 45 when the TO was called.

But the chances of ND scoring from the 9 with one more play is like 10%. From the 2 if PI was called, maybe it’s 50% at best. And regardless, it shouldn’t overshadow BYU played better last night.
quote:

BYU called a timeout with a running clock at 40 seconds. As someone else mentioned, the clock didn’t run at all on the play out of the time out and would have been 5 seconds.


That’s not what happened. BYU called the timeout with 45 seconds left, but it ran down to 40 seconds before the clock operator stopped it. They then re-set the clock to 45 seconds during the timeout. ND then ran their next play and it was at 40 seconds. So if people saw it was at 40 seconds during the timeout before it was re-set, didn’t see the re-set to 45, and then still saw 40 seconds after ND’s first play after the timeout, they think the clock didn’t run, when that’s not what happened.

But regardless of the PI and/or 1 second, it was a very poor and ill-prepared performance by ND, which should be the main takeaway at least internally. No guarantee you score even if PI is called, and especially if it wasn’t (but a second was added) because you’d still be at the 9. Even if somehow you won, sure take it and move on, but it was a very poorly played game by ND, need a lot of work to clean up.
I’m actually not a McAfee hater / think he can be entertaining and overall does a nice job with his main show and brings some levity to College Gameday in comparison to Saban/Herbie’s more “traditional” analysis.

But he has no place in the booth as a color commentator on a main (i.e., non-multicast) NFL game broadcast.
quote:

I think they should be a best guess of the voters of how the teams should play in the next week. Any lower ranked team that beats one ranked higher should be considered an upset.


So that would be predictive. There are a fair number of analytical metrics out there for that (e.g., FPI, SP+, FEI), I just think once we get to October, an AP voter should not fill out their ballot based on that.

Of course, there’s a little bit of overlap, because results on the field (and, again, results don’t just mean if you win or lose but how you win/lose) are what affect those models.
I think by this point in the season, it shouldn’t be predictive at all, just based on results (but “results” isn’t just your strength of record, it’s also how good/bad you look in wins/losses, if they’re close or blowouts, etc.).

I think it should still be mostly predictive after week 1, and then gradually move towards more weight on results each week until prob around the end of Sept (after week 4 or week 5) when it should be completely 100% only based on results from that point on.
Dude got two feet in, embarrassing from the official.

re: Iowa a playoff team?

Posted by Buckeye Fan 19 on 10/10/26 at 7:51 am to
I don’t think they’ll get in at 10-2, and I don’t think they make it through that completely unscathed.

re: Game Thread

Posted by Buckeye Fan 19 on 10/9/26 at 9:52 pm to
I saw the 13-0 for a second and was like, is my YouTubeTV extremely behind? :lol:
Lincoln Riley acted like he won the national championship for beating this shitty Washington team in the Coliseum, what a complete fricking loser.
quote:

You can still get this info


I wasn’t trying to imply you couldn’t search for it, but it used to be easily accessible / displayed on the app itself. Like not displaying nutritional information on a food item at the grocery store, but being able to Google it.
quote:

What is the end goal for line setters?

Equal $$ on both sides and collect the 10%.


It is an extremely common misconception this is always the goal. Sometimes (a minority of the time) that’s the case. But if their numbers have a game going at a certain spread, even if 80% of bets are a certain way, they’re happy to take that risk (in addition to what they’d get from the vig if it was 50/50 split in bets). They might lose big on particular games, but spread that out over the course of thousands of events annually and they come out way more ahead doing it that way than just getting the vig from 50/50 bets.

FanDuel used to publicly list the percentage of both bets and money for each game on their app. People then caught on that if 70+% of the bets/money were on Team A, the smart bet would be to put your money on Team B, so FanDuel stopped doing it.

re: NFL trivia

Posted by Buckeye Fan 19 on 10/6/26 at 3:48 pm to
Mahomes-Purdy is one instantly.

Trying to think if Brady faced one or two B1G QBs ever…
Ironically, Underwood probably has to gain some confidence from that. :lol: (But he’s still not good.)
quote:

However, BYU is ranked 8 because the media and the CFP committee need a high ranked win other than a Miami loss for ND.


Did the committee “need” a win like that to rank ND at #5 (seeded #7 due to format then) in 2024? Even further, do you think this committee, which just last year had ND as the literal last team out, has some sort of bias toward ND? Why would Hunter Yurachek be beholden to ND?

Occam’s razor, the AP ranked BYU #14 in preseason (seems as reasonable a preseason spot as any, especially in hindsight if you look at the 5-6 teams directly behind) and has just gradually moved them up as others ahead have lost, and will continue to adjust accordingly as the season progresses, without some overarching conspiracy that has anything to do with ND.

The AP has 70 individual voters. It’s not a committee that comes together to “decide” BYU should be ranked top-10. The (only) voter with BYU the highest ranked is Kirk Bohls at #7. Bohls went to Texas and currently covers Texas. Bohls has ND ranked #6, one of only 15 out of 70 AP voters that doesn’t have ND top-5. Do you think Kirk Bohls seems like a guy who has BYU ranked that high in order to try to prop up ND?

If ND goes 11-1 with a loss to Miami, it’ll almost certainly be ranked between 5-8 and hosting a CFP game without a bye, regardless of if BYU is 12-1, 11-2, 10-3, 9-3 or 8-4. 12-0 ND will be a bye.10-2 ND will be out.
quote:

I’ve read many times that BYU is an upgrade from USC, BYU is a Playoff caliber team


They’re better than USC, but that’s more about USC than BYU. BYU is “playoff caliber” in the sense they’re “potential Big 12 champion” caliber and that’s the system we have: if it was just top-12 with no AQs, I don’t think they would be. I think they’re probably around somewhere in the lower teens in actuality.

quote:

I’ve always said that BYU was the equivalent of beating a Kentucky / Mizzou / South Carolina and SMU …. :lol:


Would say it’s probably more like Tennessee. Not a juggernaut/title contender, but a game you’d be happy to get out of on the road with a win, kinda no matter how it happens.

As for your quote, I agree, and that’s been one of my biggest gripes is that I think people act like ND isn’t trying to play a strong schedule, when it kinda hasn’t worked out. They scheduled an annual series with Clemson for 2027-2038 before the start of last season, right after Clemson won the ACC and as they were entering a season as a common national champion pick. Wisconsin was scheduled when they were pretty consistent top-15 (thankfully, they’re a little better this year than I thought they’d be).

However, that being said, even if ND has tried to have a good schedule this year… it’s not a good schedule. Which is why they’ll have to go 11-1 or 12-0. 10-2 and they’ll be out. If in, SOS will be immaterial.
This happens in the NHL all the time. Wouldn’t be shocked if it’s relatively common in the NFL too, and he just got caught.

ETA: LINK :lol:
quote:

Lying about what, exactly? To date — while nothing truly to boast about — SMU and BYU are really falling short on the impressive, “show me something” scale


About ND fans trying to prop up the schedule. The vast majority acknowledge it’s not good. But while I don’t think this is you specifically, I do think some (including myself [and lionward haha]) push back on just how bad it is, as if the there’s an implication ND needs to be undefeated like it’s a G5 schedule and/or still a 4-team playoff.

The other main point I’ve always pushed back on (and this isn’t just about ND, but also Miami, IU, etc.), is that somehow a schedule affects how good a team is or isn’t. It’s a resume builder/evaluator, sure. But Arkansas probably has the toughest SOS in the country this year. They still suck. A team can have a mediocre schedule and still be elite.
quote:

Nothing against them, but I want it. ND fans trying to prop up BYU and shite Methodist University is so, so pathetic. Just have the stones and say “our schedule is a pathetic disgrace and we have a 1-game regular season.”


I don’t know why you’ve been lying so much in recent weeks when you weren’t this summer. The schedule sucks (compared to the SEC, which, yes, is different than comparing it to an average ACC/Big 12 schedule, let alone of course non-P4). I’ve said that multiple times.

That’s why ND has to go 11-1. Just like last year. ND was top-5 in essentially every power ranking/predicative measure. ND will again be this year. Even despite that, ND has to go 11-1 bc the SOS won’t be good enough to get us in at 10-2/(10-3), unlike meh OU/Bama last year.

If ND gets in, we will be one of the 7 or so threats to win it all. From there it will just depend on matchups/individual-game performance, for each of those ~7 teams.