Started By
Message

About ESPN inserting very brief ads between plays

Posted on 8/23/26 at 10:07 am
Posted by real turf fan
East Tennessee
Member since Dec 2016
12385 posts
Posted on 8/23/26 at 10:07 am
At first I thought they were mistakes, a couple of seconds of a solid color with some words on it, But between most of the plays in a quarter?
Is this going to be an NFL thing this fall, or is it just going to be on ESPN or will the NFL network do it?
I hate it and it somehow just bothers me by how intrusive it is.
Posted by LSUGent
Member since Jun 2011
3431 posts
Posted on 8/23/26 at 11:23 am to
Any second that is not the actual content people want, is a second that can be used for monetization. This is the world we live in now, and it’s fricked up.
Posted by TROLA
BATON ROUGE
Member since Apr 2004
15045 posts
Posted on 8/23/26 at 11:28 am to


Books and movies (ready player one in this case) always show us our inconvenient future if checks and balances aren’t adhered to in the future.
Posted by VideoStore
Member since Jul 2026
58 posts
Posted on 8/23/26 at 11:40 am to
quote:

Any second that is not the actual content people want, is a second that can be used for monetization. This is the world we live in now, and it’s fricked up.

It'll get worse. UFC on Paramount is a horrible watch.
Posted by CRDNLSCHMCPSN11
Member since Dec 2014
18519 posts
Posted on 8/23/26 at 12:03 pm to
I remember when the blind sheep said for other sports it was "no big deal" and "you'll get used to it". As long as morons keep defending it, they will continue multiplying until the games become unwatchable.
Posted by castorinho
13623 posts
Member since Nov 2010
88613 posts
Posted on 8/23/26 at 12:15 pm to
They are able to do that because we keep watching. It's as simple as that
Posted by Gnash
KTX
Member since Oct 2015
11896 posts
Posted on 8/23/26 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

Any second that is not the actual content people want, is a second that can be used for monetization. This is the world we live in now, and it’s fricked up.

Prime example is the “hydration breaks” that Fox and FIFA dreamed up as a way to show ads during the World Cup. They couldn’t stand to have a 45-50 straight minutes of game action without showing a single ad. Nevermind there were ads all over the field and stadium.
Posted by Hoodie
Donaldsonville, LA
Member since Dec 2019
3862 posts
Posted on 8/23/26 at 2:41 pm to
I don’t recall the network, but I’ve watched MLB games this season where they aired ads between batters.

NASCAR runs ads over the top of the final laps of stages, now.

It’s all too much; I’ve tuned out.
Posted by TheMagicMan
Member since May 2026
320 posts
Posted on 8/23/26 at 3:21 pm to
quote:

Prime example is the “hydration breaks” that Fox and FIFA dreamed up as a way to show ads during the World Cup. They couldn’t stand to have a 45-50 straight minutes of game action without showing a single ad. Nevermind there were ads all over the field and stadium.


I was somewhat okay with the hydration breaks since they've had them in previous World Cups. They just went with them in all matches this World Cup as countries complained some countries were getting them and others weren't. I definitely think they'll continue going forward.

But I think FIFA should've put in writing, as part of their contract with FOX, that the network can not go away to any commercials during the hydration breaks.

Telemundo never went away during hydration breaks and just went back to the booth or announcers to review the match. From what I know most other countries did the same.

It was largely only FOX that used the hydration breaks to put in commercials. Again, just put in the contract that no commercials are allowed during hydration breaks and FOX must stay with the match. Either with the announcers directly or the booth team on site or back in the studio. Make it clear that broadcasters can not profit from the hydration breaks.

I mean it's FIFA and the World Cup, they have all the leverage. If FOX wouldn't do it, NBC/USA, ABC/ESPN or CBS would have tripped over themselves to get the games and agree to those terms.
This post was edited on 8/23/26 at 3:22 pm
Posted by Marciano1
Marksville, LA
Member since Jun 2009
20259 posts
Posted on 8/23/26 at 4:23 pm to
In the era of smart phones and sports apps, there's no need for a bottom line + a scoreboard during live coverage. Too much shite on the screen.

Posted by CRDNLSCHMCPSN11
Member since Dec 2014
18519 posts
Posted on 8/23/26 at 6:04 pm to
quote:

I don’t recall the network, but I’ve watched MLB games this season where they aired ads between batters.


That's been happening long before this year. What I haven't noticed until last year was the stupid looking fake ads on the batter's eye on fly balls to the OF. It looks ridiculous.
Posted by CRDNLSCHMCPSN11
Member since Dec 2014
18519 posts
Posted on 8/23/26 at 6:08 pm to
ESPN's scorebar is also unnecessarily bigger and uglier.
Posted by UKWildcats
Lexington, KY
Member since Mar 2015
21069 posts
Posted on 8/24/26 at 6:02 am to
quote:

In the era of smart phones and sports apps, there's no need for a bottom line + a scoreboard during live coverage.
Thank you!
Posted by T1gerNate
Member since Feb 2020
4750 posts
Posted on 8/24/26 at 7:22 am to
If they do that shite during the regular season I’m out
Posted by RohanGonzales
Pronoun: Whatever
Member since Apr 2024
13702 posts
Posted on 8/24/26 at 7:24 am to
Sports are entertainment. Money is more important than anything on the field, like a Marvel movie.
Posted by TexasTiger08
Member since Oct 2006
30831 posts
Posted on 8/24/26 at 9:03 am to
quote:

In the era of smart phones and sports apps, there's no need for a bottom line + a scoreboard during live coverage. Too much shite on the screen.


The only reason I don’t mind it is because I’d rather be glued to one screen instead of 2. The upset alerts and score updates in a close game are fine by me.
Posted by TimeOutdoors
LA
Member since Sep 2014
13849 posts
Posted on 8/24/26 at 9:25 am to
I can hardly watch football without the quad screen because of all the commercials. When you are buying a new TV now days you need to factor how large the quad screen will be.
Posted by real turf fan
East Tennessee
Member since Dec 2016
12385 posts
Posted on 8/24/26 at 8:34 pm to
Sunday night's NFL broadcast on Fox had a brilliant treatment at the bottom of the screen. The whole screen was of the game, and just the minimum words and small images of the two teams were superimposed (individual word boxes) as if it was closed captioning. It was so easy to ignore unless I had a question (time remaining, etc.)
Posted by cubsfan5150
NWA
Member since Nov 2007
19205 posts
Posted on 8/24/26 at 11:15 pm to
quote:

Any second that is not the actual content people want, is a second that can be used for monetization. This is the world we live in now, and it’s fricked up.


Nailed it and it’s gross. The cubs radio broadcast is basically one HUGE advertisement with some baseball sprinkled in.

This foul ball brought to you by….

If there was as streaker, I’m sure they’d have an advertisement for it.
Posted by FairhopeTider
Fairhope, Alabama
Member since May 2012
23133 posts
Posted on 8/24/26 at 11:47 pm to
quote:

In the era of smart phones and sports apps, there's no need for a bottom line + a scoreboard during live coverage. Too much shite on the screen.


100%! It’s a relic from the 90’s and even then it wasn’t a thing they had on the screen the entire time. It screws up the aspect ratio of the screen and is a distraction. At least the NFL forced them to get rid of it during MNF.
This post was edited on 8/24/26 at 11:56 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram