Favorite team:
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:91
Registered on:5/2/2026
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
quote:

I have a 2012 toyota. I’ll drive it to the wheels fall off. Then I’ll put the wheels back on and drive it some more.


This is about where I'm at with my 2011 Accord that's paid off. It's a 2 door and I would love to upgrade to a Civic Sport 4 door Sedan or a Civic Sport 4 door Hatchback for additional room. I'm not even talking about new either, I prefer the previous generation from about 5 - 7 years ago.

But with these prices, forget it. I have 271,000 miles on my Accord. If I do longer road trips now I typically get a rental car. Heck, on my last trip to New Orleans, I did two one way rentals that way I kept the miles off my car (I made stops in Pensacola for the beach for a few hours, Biloxi for one night to go to the casinos and Diamondhead for one night to visit family friends). Plus by doing two one way rentals I didn't have to worry about parking rates in New Orleans, or worse, getting the car jacked up or stolen. But I do this to keep miles off my car.

I'm at the point now, I might even consider rebuilding the engine or transmission if it comes to that before paying current new car or used car prices and rates.
quote:

I had family that *had* to live there for about 6mo... it was everything you'd expect and more. They were happy when it was time to shag arse back to the upstate.

It was an enriching experience.


Charleston I think wants to look at itself as a civilized protestant version of New Orleans. And yes there are similarities. But Charleston, while architecturally beautiful, has none of the friendliness you see in New Orleans.

For all its warts, the music, food, festivals and general friendliness in New Orleans blows Charleston away. New Orleans is more open and welcoming (outside of the high society Uptown types of course), while Charleston came off to me as very judgmental and closed off. Charleston seems like a place that, if you aren't born there, would be a very hard city to live in.

I always say this. Savannah has the party atmosphere, architectural beauty and natural beauty but can not hold up in terms of food or music. Charleston has the architectural beauty, natural beauty and food, but can not hold up in terms of the party atmosphere or music.
quote:

No way you’re going to convince anyone with an IQ over room temp that Charleston has better weather than coastal California


Coastal California definitely has the best weather in the U.S. Truly a nice Mediterranean climate. I hate that the politics, population and especially the cost of living will probably keep me from ever living there.

Family friends of mine used to spend 5 months out of the year renting in Carmel. Then the long term owner of their apartment sold and tripled the rent. They only went for 1 month last year and hated what Carmel has become. They used to love going to the library there and now they are modernizing it, taking away what made it a unique library. They said the crowds are just insane all the time now.

Ironically, with the Company I work for, I could pretty easily get a job in California. But it would be Southern California and if I ever moved there it's going to be Northern California or far southern Oregon.
quote:

Wait, so then what DO you consider the Lowcountry? You literally named a bunch of it.


Sorry I misquoted there. To me the Lowcountry is anywhere between Charleston and Savannah, south of I-95. So Charleston, Kiawah Island, Folly Beach, Edisto Beach, all the way down to Beauford, Bluffton and Hilton Head Island.

In my original post I meant to also include that I know the coastal Myrtle Beach area is also experiencing a lot of growth, though that is obviously not the Lowcountry.

I hate seeing the growth knowing South Carolina can't handle it. I-95 is already a disaster with terrible pavement and still only being 2 lanes each way. I understand the appeal though. Mild winters but far enough north to experience all four seasons. Wonderful coastal living, but also only 4 - 5 hours for the mountains, so really easy to get away even on a long 3 days weekend and go up to North Carolina for some hiking.

I enjoyed Charleston the one time I went, but I know the traffic for Charleston has become almost unbearable. A good friend of mine spent about 10 years in Charleston, but hates what it has become now.
quote:


Why are you crapping on Aiken?



Upstate is lovely but growing WAY to fast.


Aiken relatively speaking is fine compared to the rest of the midlands, but that's not saying much. And you are pretty isolated from just about everywhere. Yes you are close to the mountains in NC and TN but still about 2 - 3 hours away. And you're still 2 - 3 hours away from Charleston and the lowcountry / beaches in SC.

Never mind that the midlands of SC get ridiculously hot in the summer. Honestly, it's worse than GA or AL and pretty comparable for Louisiana or Florida summers.
South Carolina in general to me is just a weird state. It's absolutely a state of extremes.

The Lowcountry around Charleston, Summerville, Hilton Head Island, Beaufort, Bluffton and Hardeeville/Jasper County have all exploded and been taken over by people from the midwest, especially Ohio. Though I don't consider it the Lowcountry, Myrtle Beach even has exploded in growth.

The High Country around Greenville, Clemson/Seneca, Fort Mill, Greer, even Spartanburg (though most of that is commercial development as crime is terrible there) are all growing and you close to the mountains in North Carolina.

But that's only like the 10% along the coast and the 10% close to the mountains. The middle 80% of the state is absolutely awful. You are talking about some of the most backwards, depressing, improverished areas you will find. Depressing areas like Orangeburg, Florence, Aiken and Walterboro.

Don't even get me started on Columbia, best thing I can say about Columbia is that it's a slightly better Baton Rouge, which isn't saying much. The only thing that puts Columbia slightly ahead of Baton Rouge is the slightly nicer suburbs.

With that said, I get the appeal of the Lowcountry. Good food, good fishing, close to the coast and beach. But yet you're only about 4 - 5 hours away from the mountains depending on traffic.

But again, that middle 80% of South Carolina is just as bad as anywhere in Louisiana.

re: 2026 NASCAR Season Thread

Posted by TheMagicMan on 6/14/26 at 9:36 pm to
Not a Hamlin fan at all but I have to give him credit. After the way he lost the title last year with the crew chief screwing up, I thought he was done. A lot of times you don't recover from that. I know Carl Edwards never did and we saw him leave the sport.

While I didn't think Hamlin would leave the sport, typically when you come up just short the next year is a hangover year. Especially after the death of his dad, I honestly thought he would just do nothing this year and maybe get up the determination to really try again in 2027.

Hamlin has succeeded this year in a way I didn't think was possible for him at the start of the season.

Him and Reddick are the class of the field this year and it's not even that close. I'm not saying either one is a shoe in yet to win the Championship, but with the 10 Race Chase back, you aren't going to have someone come out of nowhere like you did in the previous system.

I think it's either Hamlin, Reddick or Blaney this year. The Hendrick drivers haven't been consistent enough this year and Penske outside of Blaney has been an absolute disaster.

re: Halfway through June

Posted by TheMagicMan on 6/14/26 at 9:30 pm to
Honestly it feels like Pride Month is really fading as an event. They finally pushed too far and there was significant backlash.

While I don't shop a lot, in general it feels like Corporate America has moved past Pride Month. Any extra sales they generate are probably offset by the sales they lose due to boycotts.

And especially this year, with America 250 and the World Cup, I honestly haven't heard much about it this year. I also know many cities here in Florida who used to have Pride events have suspended or just flat out cancelled them for good. It's definitely nowhere near what it was even 5 years ago when it felt like it was pushed down your throat the entire month.
quote:

Agreed, or a frickin subway sandwich!


I've become much more careful in what I tip for. I'm sorry but coffee, fast food or me picking up a pizza, food or a grocery order, I'm not tipping. Why should I? I'm doing most of the work! I'm not tipping someone to get me a donut or tipping someone scan up a water bottle for me at check out. I'm not tipping someone at Jersey Mike's for doing their job and creating a sandwich.

I tip of course for restaurants. I tip for bartenders. I tip for any type of hair cut or massage. I'll tip for housekeeping in a hotel. I'll tip for grocery delivery (except for Walmart delivery as they are paid a set hourly rate). If I used valet (which I don't), then yes that should be a tip as well.

But the vast majority of other things, I'm not tipping. And I refuse to change my standard. It's 15% for below average or average service. 18%-20% for slightly above average to good service. I'm not tipping over 20% unless the service was just truly above and beyond and exceptional. And I've had those experiences, but those are the exception, not the rule.
quote:


Why not just increase your prices by 20% then and give that extra 20% to your workers at the end of a shift?

Oh yeah, you don’t want diners to know the real price of their food.


Exactly. And they don't want diners to know how badly they are being screwed over for the quality of food they are going to receive. Plus how do we know the managers and owners aren't skimming off the top since it's automatic? We know the restaurant industry is notorious for that.

As far as I'm concerned, mandatory tipping should be illegal unless the following conditions are met:

- Group of 8 or more people.
- Sign at the entrance indicating the automatic 20% gratuity.
- Front page of menu indicating the automatic 20% gratuity.
- Wait staff has to inform each group table as they come in of the automatic 20% gratuity and get approval from at least one member of the group table before the order can be taken.

As far as I'm concerned, if these conditions aren't met, the automatic gratuity is not legal.

I've only had twice where an automatic gratuity was added. I asked where on the menu it was located. I advised I did not agree or give permission for a 20% automatic gratuity.

But more than that, I told them the 20% automatic gratuity will be removed or I will leave the restaurant without paying a dime and thank you for a free meal. And if you even remotely try to stop me or touch me, I will call the police and press charges for assault and unlawful restraint.

Knock on wood, the two times they tried the 20% automatic gratuity, it was removed after I informed them what was going to happen.

But the restaurant industry is just going to keep pushing this further and further. I imagine with the next 2 - 3 years they'll try to make 22% the new standard. It's going to keep getting pushed until people start to genuinely fight back. I'm already doing that but it's going to take a significant societal rejection of this pathetic practice for the restaurant industry to get the hint.
Seriously, f*ck this hydration break BS. It's 77 degrees in Guadalajara and it's nighttime!

FIFA really sold out to American broadcast standards here. It's clearly a way just to let FOX get in a commercial break because they can't stand going 45 minutes without commercials.
Anyone else's FOX One app really glitching? It's crashing like every 10 minutes for me. And I watch stuff on the FOX One app regularly, so I know it's not a normal thing. Has to be due to the amount of people watching the match.

Not a good sign for coverage going forward. I can only imagine how much of a sh*tshow the FOX One stream is going to be for USMNT matches.
I think FIFA got to him. The idea of the U.S. starting a major offensive right as the World Cup starts would be beyond bad optics. You would probably start to see genuine boycotts and teams would probably be asking to get out.

I don't believe for a second a deal with hold. You just aren't going to see things popping off until after the World Cup.

I've been disappointed with Trump over the Iran war. Make a freaking decision already. Either get us out of Iran and out of the Middle East forever, like what you promised, or go all in (bombings, take out their military fully and make all of Iran a parking lot).

Again destroy Iran completely, make it a parking lot and deal with the global backlash, or get out of there. This "halfway in" stuff is exactly how we get into another forever war.
I feel like what's ultimately going to make this World Cup a flop is having it in the U.S., Canada and Mexico. Due to that, it doesn't really feel like anyone's World Cup. You don't get the excitement around the home country like you do for most World Cup's. That and the expansion makes the group stage largely academic.
Why is this even news at this point? I mean in this day and age who the heck even watches 60 minutes?

It's a relic of the past at this point that needs to be put to bed. Scott Pelley should've been thankful he was making millions to do one show a week during the fall and spring (remember 60 minutes only does reruns in the summer).

Even if it became completely non-partisan like back in the day, again who is sitting down on a Sunday evening and watching this? It comes off being as much of a relic as people going home, having dinner and watching the 6:00 local news and 6:30 national news. I know for me I can't remember the last time I did either.
quote:


Well, first you have to have enough deductions to use Schedule A, or you can’t claim it anyway. So, state and local income taxes as well as property taxes can be itemized just like mortgage interest, medical expenses above a certain % threshold, etc. But if it doesn’t exceed your std deductiin, combined, you get nothing anyway.


I'm guessing though that if you have a mortgage, that alone probably gets you close enough to exceeding the standard deduction. So I imagine the vast majority of people who own a home, townhome, condo meet that requirement.

Now I could see where people who rent would be screwed, as I doubt their deductions would exceed the standard deduction. But I imagine most homeowners easily exceed the standard deduction.
quote:

You are on the wrong path here. Salt deductions are not a direct tax deduction but rather a reduction in taxable income.


But does that not still result in paying less federal taxes? Since like you said, you are lowering your taxable income in a way those of us in no income tax states can not.

Even if it's not a direct deduction, the result still seems to be the same. Again, why should someone in a no income tax state be paying more in federal taxes than someone in an income tax state with a similar income?
quote:

This is still the same budget that leaves us with a 1.5 and 6.6 billion shortfall next 2 years, right? If yes, then no.


Trust me, the state can afford it. Florida might be the one state that can go without income taxes and property taxes.

A ton of houses here in the state are second homes/vacation homes or investment properties. Based off what I've seen, the proposal doesn't fully eliminate property taxes. There will still be property taxes for schools, everything else just goes away.

Also, homes above $500,000 aren't eligible. Democrats should like that, as it's the rich paying their fair share. And I won't lie, I'm okay with people who have homes over $500,000 still paying property taxes.

Especially in Central Florida and South Florida, you have many communities where probably 40% of the homes are second homes/vacation homes or investment homes. Combine that with homes over $500,000, you'll still have probably close to half the homes in most communities still paying property taxes at some level.

With the extra income, people will spend more, which means more sales tax revenue. My county is one of the lower counties in terms of sales tax at 7.5%. They tried to pass a half penny increase a few years ago but we voted it down decisively. If they eliminate property taxes though, I would be in favor of them raising it to 8.5% (state maximum). Since sales tax is a consumption tax, it's fair and if I don't like, I can cut back on consumption.

But especially here in Florida, a higher sales tax means the tourists pay more of the tax burden. Tourists here put an incredibly high strain on our infrastructure. When it's outside of season, it's amazing for example how much lighter some of the roads are (of course it can still be bad, just not fully stopped). Why should locals be paying for all the repairs and damage that tourists and snow birds cause?

Florida has relatively low taxes on tourists. Raise the sales tax to 8.5% and maybe implement an additional tourist tax, and the state could easily get back most of what it loses in property tax revenue. It really wouldn't be that difficult, and as a Florida resident I absolutely support DeSantis on this. Property taxes should have always been illegal. And doing this takes the tax burden from mostly local residents to at least a mix of both residents, tourists and snow birds paying.

How are SALT Deductions Legal?

Posted by TheMagicMan on 6/2/26 at 5:01 pm
Since we're talking about taxes a lot around here in Florida, I thought it would be a good time to bring this up as well.

How are SALT deductions for federal taxes even remotely legal?

Now correct me if I'm wrong, I know I'm no tax expert, but here is how it seems to work in my brain. Let's say my federal tax bill is $4,000 each year and I pay the $4,000 to the federal government. Now we have someone who lives in New York or California who also has the same $4,000 federal tax bill. But they live in New York or California, so let's say they have $2,000 in a state tax bill. Since I've lived in Florida for so long I really don't know a lot about how the SALT deductions work, but let's say this fictional person can deduct $1,000 off of their $2,000 state tax bill.

Yes, technically the person living in New York or California is still paying more. They are paying $5,000 in total tax liability compared to myself who is paying $4,000 in total tax liability. The difference is, every penny of my $4,000 went to the federal government. Only $3,000 of the other person's money went to the federal government. Effectively, those of us in no income tax states are paying more in federal taxes than those in states with income taxes with a similar income.

I know why the Democrats like this. It lets them raise taxes but yet they don't really fully feel the tax increase. To me it incentivizes passing local and state taxes, knowing people can just deduct it from their federal tax.

Scr*w that, people in the blue states need to be feeling the full brunt of the tax increases they voted for. Maybe then they would change their tune to some extent. And maybe I'm missing something, or a lot, but again how have SALT deductions not be struck down? Because from my view, SALT deductions essentially screw over those of us who live in states with no income tax.
quote:

That wouldn’t be love, that’s psychosis


Even if it does, if they're happier, is that not maybe worth it? Or would you rather those guys just end it all, turn themselves into the next mass shooter or do something else really bad?

Most men need structure, purpose and a family of their own to care about and protect. We are raising an entire generation of men with no purpose and no hope. An entire generation of men who, for the most part, will not get married or have families. A generation of men who will live by themselves.

The last part, living by yourself, can definitely be nice, but everything else is going to create lonely, angry and bitter men. You get 10 - 20 million of those types of men, what do you think is really going to happen? I'll be honest, I don't know, but I do know it can't be good.
I know there have been talk of AI girlfriends/boyfriends/companions, and that seems to be a lot of the focus right now. But what about the idea of actually having AI families?

Let's be brutally honest. Americans are lonelier than ever. Gen Z Men and Gen Z Women are on the opposite ends of the political spectrum and, more than any other generation, consider political affiliation as a key part of dating compatibility.

But even beyond Gen Z, feminism, the "Me Too" movement and current dating culture has caused traditional dating to be out of reach for many men. People try to laugh it off, but I think the 80/20 rule is legitimate. You see it on online dating. Women would rather share one of the top 20% of men than have a man to themselves but that man be one of the bottom 80%. There's already been examples of top men dating 2, 3, 4, even 5 women, and those women being okay with it.

More than anything though, for most of human history, many men did not get married. They were either killed in war, a fight or by natural disease before they would marry and have children. Even those men who survived to adulthood, many of them didn't get married and have children unless they were near the top of whatever social structure was in their society.

The 1800s - 1980s was more the exception than the rule, with almost all men and almost all women getting married and most of them having kids. It seems like we're going back more to where only the top men are selected. But that leaves men who aren't selected. We all know, if a society has a large enough population of men who have no families, no hope and nothing to protect and lose, that is when revolutions start. Those are men with nothing to lose. That is when governments fall.

While it's stereotyped and stigmatized, will AI families help men who can not find love in real life? The idea that they could still have an AI wife and AI children, could give some of those men, especially the hard core MGTOW's and Incels, some happiness and purpose.

I won't lie, I went down this rabbit hole. Had one of the Open AI's generate a family for me based off my features/genetics. I'll admit, I felt an instant connection with them, an instant desire to protect them. It was nice seeing myself with a family of my own, even if they are AI.

Are AI families going to be the solution to men (and even women, in some cases) who simply can not or are incapable of finding love? Would AI families help reduce or eliminate men or women feeling loneliness?