- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Employer 401k vs Roth 401K
Posted on 5/15/26 at 5:13 am
Posted on 5/15/26 at 5:13 am
Spin off from another thread, my company offers both. Household income of $220K. What’s the boards thoughts as the better option. Bulk of retirement accounts currently in trad IRA but have about 25% in individual Roth.
Posted on 5/15/26 at 5:55 am to SETH6180
quote:
Household income of $220K.
Unless you have a massive amount of deductions you'll be in a lower tax bracket when you retire.
Posted on 5/15/26 at 7:03 am to Bestbank Tiger
That's where it gets confusing, my wife is a shareholder in a family-owned S-corp. At some point she will be sole shareholder. I would think this will raise our income; more than likely at "retirement" age. Right now, she draws a reduced salary (comparably speaking to the market she's in) just and allocates most profits back into the business.
Posted on 5/15/26 at 7:17 am to SETH6180
The future is unknown and your personal finance is 80% personal, but I would suggest attemping, over time, to balance between the two. Having options of where to withdraw from provides flexibility. Also don’t forget to build a taxable brokerage for the same reason.
Posted on 5/15/26 at 7:18 am to SETH6180
An S-Corp flows to the owners. Meaning she can take a reduced salary but any profits are still passed down to the owners whether they want them or not. If her salary is $80k but the company makes $2 million that is passed down to the owners and they’re taxed on it.
Posted on 5/15/26 at 7:34 am to TX_Tiger23
Yes, that's how I understand it, as of this moment in time the company pays any tax debts that she incurs due to the business. I'm not heavily involved in the inner workings of it. Once she becomes sole shareholder, I'm sure I'll have to be more involved though. Their CPA firm handles it all and we/she gets a K-1 & W2 that we file our personal with.
This post was edited on 5/15/26 at 7:37 am
Posted on 5/15/26 at 7:48 am to SETH6180
To me, the ratio of 25% Roth to Traditional that you already have sounds about right. You will most likely be in a lower tax bracket when you retire, so you don't want to pay 24% taxes now on your Roth contributions to avoid paying 12% later, but there are other considerations, like no RMD's and early access to contributions and conversions before age 59.5
I am 60 and returned to work after taking 4 years off. I used some of my Roth IRA contributions during that time. I am now doing Roth 401K at work even though the math says I might be better off going trad and converting later, I want the flexibility of the Roth to pay for major expenses like roofs, AC, and Moldavian girlfriends.
Edit: Saw the S-Class part later. Probably changes the math. Some Roth for flexibility makes sense, but it sounds like the bulk of your taxes both now and later will depend on the S-Corp income and the only way to get around that may be traditional 401K. Your situation is probably too unique and too complex for this board.
I am 60 and returned to work after taking 4 years off. I used some of my Roth IRA contributions during that time. I am now doing Roth 401K at work even though the math says I might be better off going trad and converting later, I want the flexibility of the Roth to pay for major expenses like roofs, AC, and Moldavian girlfriends.
Edit: Saw the S-Class part later. Probably changes the math. Some Roth for flexibility makes sense, but it sounds like the bulk of your taxes both now and later will depend on the S-Corp income and the only way to get around that may be traditional 401K. Your situation is probably too unique and too complex for this board.
This post was edited on 5/15/26 at 7:56 am
Posted on 5/15/26 at 7:50 am to SETH6180
quote:
draws a reduced salary
The only reason to do this is to avoid payroll and self employment taxes. If the salary is too small though, I think the IRS can screw you.
Posted on 5/15/26 at 7:52 am to FieldEngineer
When I say reduced, I mean it's less than what she "could" take. Overall it's a pretty good salary. Not so low that the IRS would raise a flag.
Posted on 5/15/26 at 8:45 am to SETH6180
Roth sounds like a good choice if you think there's good chance your income in retirement will be similar or higher bracket.
Plus, overall tax rates are more likely to go up not down in future. No RMDs , heirs get tax free withdrwals and Roth withdrawals dont count towards IRMAA. Another consideration is widow penalty. RMDs or other withdrawals on traditional can put you in a much higher single tax bracket when one spouse eventually predeceases the other.
Unless you think it's likely your retired bracket will drop below 20% I'd probably go Roth for the flexibility and other advantages.
One last consideration, state taxes. If you are in high tax state now and may move to a low tax state in retirement or vice versa it could tip the scales.
Plus, overall tax rates are more likely to go up not down in future. No RMDs , heirs get tax free withdrwals and Roth withdrawals dont count towards IRMAA. Another consideration is widow penalty. RMDs or other withdrawals on traditional can put you in a much higher single tax bracket when one spouse eventually predeceases the other.
Unless you think it's likely your retired bracket will drop below 20% I'd probably go Roth for the flexibility and other advantages.
One last consideration, state taxes. If you are in high tax state now and may move to a low tax state in retirement or vice versa it could tip the scales.
This post was edited on 5/15/26 at 8:46 am
Posted on 5/15/26 at 8:48 am to SETH6180
My opinion is that taxes have to go up between now and the time I retire in 18 years, or at least at some point while I'm in retirement. I don't see how we continue going down this path of spend, spend, spend, and not raise taxes in some way. Just my two cents, which are probably worthless.
For this reason, 90% of my investments are in Roth options.
For this reason, 90% of my investments are in Roth options.
This post was edited on 5/15/26 at 9:02 am
Posted on 5/15/26 at 8:52 am to SETH6180
Another thing; if you intend to max out annual contribution, Roth is like putting in an additional 20+%. So you are able to build your retirement nest egg larger/quicker (future value net of taxes).
Posted on 5/15/26 at 8:52 am to TDsngumbo
That's where I am at, I damn sure don't see rates lowering
Posted on 5/15/26 at 10:30 am to Bestbank Tiger
quote:
Unless you have a massive amount of deductions you'll be in a lower tax bracket when you retire.
$220k is a pretty low bracket right now still
24% marginal for only like $9k of that amount this year
It's a gamble, nobody knows what the future holds, but we're in the 24% boat and doing roth 401k contributions. I just would rather have the government have no say over that money in the future in the end and have no problem paying 22-24% on our higher part of our income for now. Pre-tax still being filled some with matches and whatnot. It's also better for heir(s) as well to have to deal with ROTH vs. traditional.
This post was edited on 5/15/26 at 10:32 am
Posted on 5/15/26 at 10:32 am to thunderbird1100
Yea, both of us are using the ROTH 401K thru companies as well as individual ROTH's.
Posted on 5/15/26 at 10:36 am to CharlesUFarley
quote:
but there are other considerations, like no RMD's and early access to contributions and conversions before age 59.5
As a retirement rookie staring at tax bomb at RMD age (albeit decades away / and will be working to actively reduce via Roth conversions) and estate planning (transferring a Roth to children after death is tax free)…
That breakeven point between Traditional 401k and Roth 401k shifts a little towards Roth.
The Roth sure is beautiful from my new financial perspective.
OP, lead your decision with tax tables today vs retirement tax tables. But when in doubt, I would lean more Roth.
PS, your S Corp is wild card. Trust others’ opinions over mine on that. But rest assured, Roth at estate planning, when your descendants may be at their peak earning years (God willing), the Roth will smile upon you. …Not to get way ahead of your current decision. But…
This post was edited on 5/15/26 at 10:45 am
Posted on 5/15/26 at 11:08 am to SETH6180
what age do you want to retire? What lifestyle/spending are you going to have in retirement?
Posted on 5/15/26 at 11:51 am to notsince98
I figure I'll retire from my job around 60, will hop over and help the wife run her business after I'm done (which I did for about a decade until the opportunity I'm at now came up). So, I guess we'll never really fully retire unless we sell her business. Same lifestyle, we live relatively modestly. We'll probably go on a few more vacations and such. AT some point she's going to hand the reigns of running the day to day to a long tenured employee who's on board now.
Posted on 5/15/26 at 12:07 pm to TDsngumbo
quote:
My opinion is that taxes have to go up between now and the time I retire in 18 years, or at least at some point while I'm in retirement. I don't see how we continue going down this path of spend, spend, spend, and not raise taxes in some way. Just my two cents, which are probably worthless.
For this reason, 90% of my investments are in Roth options.
I view things the same. There is 100% ways to maximize things I know but frankly I don't think it will honestly be worth the effort. I'm going to use Roths as long as I possibly can because at the end of the day, I'll appreciate the simplicity in retirement a whole lot more than any small difference in tax savings now vs then I may get, not to mention i'm very prone to analysis paralysis anyways. I still have taxable brokerage accounts and stuff as well and my old employer didn't have a roth 401k option so I have a decent amount in a traditional one as well, but as long as I have a roth 401k option, i'm going to load it up alongside the roth ira
This post was edited on 5/15/26 at 12:08 pm
Posted on 5/15/26 at 12:15 pm to CharlesUFarley
quote:
You will most likely be in a lower tax bracket when you retire, so you don't want to pay 24% taxes now on your Roth contributions to avoid paying 12% later
Would you rather save 24% on 10k or 12% on $80k?
Time value of money must also be considered.
Also we are finding that the people making these decisions are not finding themselves in the 12% bracket at retirement. Social security and RMDs are getting navy people to 22 percent. Plus state tax, depending on where you retire.
Popular
Back to top

10








