
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: This team’s achilles heel
Posted on 9/13/26 at 11:52 am to GetmorewithLes
Posted on 9/13/26 at 11:52 am to GetmorewithLes
I saw the transfer TE from Pitt play some last night. Perhaps we could use some true two TE looks which sometimes forces a defense to employ base looks. How much did Lane and Weis actually Tech? I don't know, but there was a lot of confusion out there.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 11:55 am to Lester Earl
quote:
Offensive line & it’s not even close
Lester I know Kiffin like putting in does well in practice.. but with him also complaining about guard plays is it time to stop the feel good story with Bordelon and put in Devin Harper and see if he performs better in games?
Posted on 9/13/26 at 11:59 am to TigerFan244
I think it comes down to as simple as if we can run the ball we will be successful with this team, if they can shut down our run like last night and make Sam throw the ball we are going to be in trouble. The key will be challenging teams enough downfield so they don't just stack the box and pin their ears back against our running game.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 12:02 pm to Honkus
quote:
We were also very vanilla last night
Yes, that had to be the worse half of playcalling by Weis in his career.
Even Les Miles was frustrated.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 12:09 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
there a particular play you are talking about?
All that led to short fgs or 100 yd interceptions
Im confused, are you denying the issue exists? I dont try for perfection in posts, or photographic memories, but damn man, youre approach suggesting its not happening is beyond bizarre
Posted on 9/13/26 at 12:32 pm to TigerFan244
It’s without question the O line. Another weak group. Seaton excluded obviously.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 12:43 pm to ChatGPT of LA
Well, there weren’t very many short yardage situations in the game. I’m struggling to understand what plays you are talking about out
Posted on 9/13/26 at 12:44 pm to R11
With two savants calling the offense, the short yardage play calling is still the same as the last 5 years. Delayrd draw/option from 6 yards deep handed straight up the middle for a loss of yards. We did it six times last night. Finally started gaining yards when we direct snapped instead of that long slow handoff from the shotgun. I just don't understand how in a day of ai, and analytics that somebody has not charted the fact that that play is 0 for the last 200 through three coaches at lsu. Is the run game outside of the quarterback just that limited in shotgun. formation?
Posted on 9/13/26 at 12:56 pm to TigerFan244
Wide receivers except for Philip Wright or having difficulty getting separation on go routes
Posted on 9/13/26 at 12:57 pm to Tigerfan1999
The Oline woes from this game are completely over blown. Did they play well? No. Did they suck as bad as tRant is making it out? No.
The Bulldogs had one mission and it was to stop the run. They added a safety or slot db into the run fit ALOT making it where they had more guys playing the run than we had blocking. That along with all the run stunts out of the 3-3 gave us some issues. Kiffin and Weiss figured it out and adjusted properly but they were a tad stubborn early likely due to it being “LA Tech”. Tech was content letting us complete short passes and forcing us to drive the field instead of chunk plays. That only works if we make mistakes and give them the ball. We turned it over 4 times in first half. Second half we didn’t turn it over and we scored 35
Redzone run game struggled early because IMO Kiffin and Charlie were trying to be very basic. Tech committed almost everybody to the run so we either had to run the QB or we had to read a defender to make the numbers right. We did neither early. Later in the game we adjusted and started running the QB wide which took advantage of those inside run stunts and allowed us to equal the number of run defenders with the number of blockers in the run.
So basically what you saw was a solid plan by Tech then Kiffin and Charlie adjusting to the tune of 528 yards. I’d also add Ole Miss can’t stop the run so they are going to have to leave that bad secondary exposed to add an extra DB to the run fit or watch us run it down their throat. This offense has answers for any problem. The only thing that can stop it turnovers.
The Bulldogs had one mission and it was to stop the run. They added a safety or slot db into the run fit ALOT making it where they had more guys playing the run than we had blocking. That along with all the run stunts out of the 3-3 gave us some issues. Kiffin and Weiss figured it out and adjusted properly but they were a tad stubborn early likely due to it being “LA Tech”. Tech was content letting us complete short passes and forcing us to drive the field instead of chunk plays. That only works if we make mistakes and give them the ball. We turned it over 4 times in first half. Second half we didn’t turn it over and we scored 35
Redzone run game struggled early because IMO Kiffin and Charlie were trying to be very basic. Tech committed almost everybody to the run so we either had to run the QB or we had to read a defender to make the numbers right. We did neither early. Later in the game we adjusted and started running the QB wide which took advantage of those inside run stunts and allowed us to equal the number of run defenders with the number of blockers in the run.
So basically what you saw was a solid plan by Tech then Kiffin and Charlie adjusting to the tune of 528 yards. I’d also add Ole Miss can’t stop the run so they are going to have to leave that bad secondary exposed to add an extra DB to the run fit or watch us run it down their throat. This offense has answers for any problem. The only thing that can stop it turnovers.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 1:07 pm to geauxpurple
quote:
Same as last year. OL.
Except for last year 140 yards rushing would’ve been one of our best rushing performances. Some of yall are too stupid to insult.

Popular
Back to top

0







