Started By
Message

re: This team’s achilles heel

Posted on 9/13/26 at 11:52 am to
Posted by bearhc
Member since Sep 2009
5965 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 11:52 am to
I saw the transfer TE from Pitt play some last night. Perhaps we could use some true two TE looks which sometimes forces a defense to employ base looks. How much did Lane and Weis actually Tech? I don't know, but there was a lot of confusion out there.
Posted by king47
Member since Aug 2020
2348 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 11:55 am to
quote:

Offensive line & it’s not even close


Lester I know Kiffin like putting in does well in practice.. but with him also complaining about guard plays is it time to stop the feel good story with Bordelon and put in Devin Harper and see if he performs better in games?
Posted by Srobi14
South Florida
Member since Aug 2014
4092 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 11:59 am to
I think it comes down to as simple as if we can run the ball we will be successful with this team, if they can shut down our run like last night and make Sam throw the ball we are going to be in trouble. The key will be challenging teams enough downfield so they don't just stack the box and pin their ears back against our running game.
Posted by TigerDCC11
Member since May 2007
3706 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

We were also very vanilla last night


Yes, that had to be the worse half of playcalling by Weis in his career.

Even Les Miles was frustrated.
Posted by ChatGPT of LA
Member since Mar 2023
7966 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 12:09 pm to
quote:

there a particular play you are talking about?


All that led to short fgs or 100 yd interceptions

Im confused, are you denying the issue exists? I dont try for perfection in posts, or photographic memories, but damn man, youre approach suggesting its not happening is beyond bizarre
Posted by Tigerfan1999
Member since Jan 2025
911 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 12:32 pm to
It’s without question the O line. Another weak group. Seaton excluded obviously.
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
291939 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 12:43 pm to
Well, there weren’t very many short yardage situations in the game. I’m struggling to understand what plays you are talking about out

Posted by BBQ
Member since Oct 2018
268 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 12:44 pm to
With two savants calling the offense, the short yardage play calling is still the same as the last 5 years. Delayrd draw/option from 6 yards deep handed straight up the middle for a loss of yards. We did it six times last night. Finally started gaining yards when we direct snapped instead of that long slow handoff from the shotgun. I just don't understand how in a day of ai, and analytics that somebody has not charted the fact that that play is 0 for the last 200 through three coaches at lsu. Is the run game outside of the quarterback just that limited in shotgun. formation?
Posted by entmd2002
Lufkin, TX
Member since Dec 2010
460 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 12:56 pm to
Wide receivers except for Philip Wright or having difficulty getting separation on go routes
Posted by NussBusDriver
Mississippi
Member since Sep 2024
314 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 12:57 pm to
The Oline woes from this game are completely over blown. Did they play well? No. Did they suck as bad as tRant is making it out? No.

The Bulldogs had one mission and it was to stop the run. They added a safety or slot db into the run fit ALOT making it where they had more guys playing the run than we had blocking. That along with all the run stunts out of the 3-3 gave us some issues. Kiffin and Weiss figured it out and adjusted properly but they were a tad stubborn early likely due to it being “LA Tech”. Tech was content letting us complete short passes and forcing us to drive the field instead of chunk plays. That only works if we make mistakes and give them the ball. We turned it over 4 times in first half. Second half we didn’t turn it over and we scored 35


Redzone run game struggled early because IMO Kiffin and Charlie were trying to be very basic. Tech committed almost everybody to the run so we either had to run the QB or we had to read a defender to make the numbers right. We did neither early. Later in the game we adjusted and started running the QB wide which took advantage of those inside run stunts and allowed us to equal the number of run defenders with the number of blockers in the run.


So basically what you saw was a solid plan by Tech then Kiffin and Charlie adjusting to the tune of 528 yards. I’d also add Ole Miss can’t stop the run so they are going to have to leave that bad secondary exposed to add an extra DB to the run fit or watch us run it down their throat. This offense has answers for any problem. The only thing that can stop it turnovers.
Posted by geauxpurple
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2014
17944 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 1:05 pm to
Same as last year. OL.
Posted by NussBusDriver
Mississippi
Member since Sep 2024
314 posts
Posted on 9/13/26 at 1:07 pm to
quote:

Same as last year. OL.


Except for last year 140 yards rushing would’ve been one of our best rushing performances. Some of yall are too stupid to insult.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram