- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Sankey named as a defendant in Texas
Posted on 8/27/26 at 4:37 pm
Posted on 8/27/26 at 4:37 pm
Posted on 8/27/26 at 4:38 pm to 1999
This all could have been nothing if they just let this year be an anomaly and move past it
Posted on 8/27/26 at 4:38 pm to Veritas
yep, these lawsuits are never gonna end. good luck to the league 
Posted on 8/27/26 at 4:41 pm to 1999
Following his daddy Pettiti has got him in the jackpot.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 4:42 pm to Veritas
The ncaa specifically wanted this chaos.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 4:44 pm to 1999
Good luck??
More like good for him.
You are fighting against the wave by issuing edicts.
This is coming , as just as many have pointed out, there is no difference in professional sport and pro-college sport if they are paid. You cannot stop someone from making a living with your non- sense rulings especially when court has already spoken.
More like good for him.
You are fighting against the wave by issuing edicts.
This is coming , as just as many have pointed out, there is no difference in professional sport and pro-college sport if they are paid. You cannot stop someone from making a living with your non- sense rulings especially when court has already spoken.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 4:45 pm to Fun Bunch
And now the SEC stepped in it.
They could have said we don’t like it, blame the NCAA, but acknowledge the judicial system of the United States.
They could have said we don’t like it, blame the NCAA, but acknowledge the judicial system of the United States.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 4:48 pm to Fun Bunch
Correct. Or else they would have specified about this class of graduating seniors when they made the 5 for 5 rule.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 4:48 pm to 1999
Per Tony Clayton the amended TRO has been filed with the judge in Louisiana that adds the SEC as well as Greg Sankey to the request
Posted on 8/27/26 at 4:49 pm to Veritas
quote:
This all could have been nothing if they just let this year be an anomaly and move past it
They opened the floodgates with allowing Chambliss to come back for a sinus infection 3 years ago. Had these other player been afforded the assurance Chambliss was, the benefit of knowing a home cooking by an alum on the bench was taking place, many of them would have returned to school and never declared for the draft. They literally have been screwed out of potentially millions in earnings, because they are in fact not making NFL rosters. Meanwhile, Trinidad is the poster boy for the SEC. It’s absurd. He would have declared for the draft too had he not known the courts were going to rule in his favor.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 4:49 pm to Veritas
If the gumps were pushing this they would have
Posted on 8/27/26 at 4:50 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
The ncaa specifically wanted this chaos.
The NCAA specifically argued in the Colorado case that granting an additional year of eligibility to the Freshman 2022 class would create chaos.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 4:51 pm to 1999
Tony Clayton has also filed an amendment to bring in the SEC. He was just on the Moscona’s show.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 4:53 pm to 1999
quote:
SEC wants to try to block any of their returns
The SEC will not specifically block them, but no SEC school will play them until they get more protections than what a local judge can offer.
quote:
Notably, at least one of these players (former Miami LB Wesley Bissainthe) is currently listed on an NFL roster. He has played for the Kansas City Chiefs in preseason games this year. This would contradict the SEC's new pro player ban.
quote:I haven’t seen the exact wording, but is the judge declaring the decision cannot be appealed to higher court?
If the NCAA or SEC wants to try to block any of their returns, they would have to go to court and argue their case in front of the judge, acc'd to the order.
Regardless these elected local yokels are making federal law decisions on a topic they probably have rarely dealt with since law school.
They are probably getting hard or wet or both under their robes while signing what some clerk likely wrote for them.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 4:55 pm to Veritas
quote:
This all could have been nothing if they just let this year be an anomaly and move past it
Could also be nothing if they followed the original rule from the NCAA that said the class of 2022 was excluded from 5 for 5. It’s not the NCAA’s fault that anytime they put a rule place, a player can take it to a local judge and have it overturned. We have random judges making up rules for college football on the fly.
This post was edited on 8/27/26 at 4:57 pm
Posted on 8/27/26 at 4:55 pm to Wayne Campbell
quote:
The NCAA specifically argued in the Colorado case that granting an additional year of eligibility to the Freshman 2022 class would create chaos.
and They got that TRO stayed.
Imagine the chaos of multiple elected local judges making different decisions and forcing in different levels of pro experiences.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 4:57 pm to LSBoosie
Why would a class of 2022 player accept that?
Popular
Back to top


14






