dallastigers

quote:

---

LSU is currently at 18% of student body black. Miss State is the only other SEC school over 12%, and they are around 15%. Mississippi has a higher percentage black population than Louisiana, and yet OM and State have smaller percentages of black students. Most SEC schools have 6-10%. Tate and crew had to work to get the numbers that high. It was by design.

---

quote:

---

quote:

---

One frat while white enrollment was dropping in both % of freshman and total undergraduate enrollment and in number of enrollees for both. I bet he fooled more than you on this and got some press doing it.

Sports and I guess a white fraternity are the white alumni’s bling bling distracting them from what was happening with DEI undergraduate enrollment focus.

---

Give examples

---

quote:

---

I visited LSU last in 2013. How could it have gotten so bad so quickly? It looked perfectly fine then. I sense a lot of exaggeration.

What would look different these days?

---

quote:

---

Wow how times change.

I’ve been highly critical of Tate and my posts generally get massive downvotes. Yours got massive upvotes, so perhaps people are realizing what a charlatan he was at LSU.

---

quote:

---

We were watching Rudolph, and when it ended, we told the kids they need to go get in bed to make sure Santa comes and brings presents. This motherfricker proceeds to stand up, stretch, look right at the kids and say “Santa’s not real. He’s a fake guy. Your mom and dad already brought the presents.” Immediately, the 6 year old starts tearing up, asking us if Santa is fake, while the 3 year old bursts into a tears, crying and screaming.

---

quote:

---

The Feeding Our Future case has opened a window on a panoply of scams committed on Minnesota Medicaid programs (so-called “waivered” programs) that appear to have been designed to facilitate fraud: Housing Stabilization Services, Early Intensive Developmental and Behavioral Intervention autism services, and 12 other such programs that Governor Tim Walz has now temporarily suspended for review.

---

quote:

---

Employees from the Minnesota Department of Human Services say the state's massive fraud scandal leads straight back to the governor. They claim “Tim Walz is 100% responsible for massive fraud in Minnesota,” insisting they warned him early but “got the opposite response.” Instead of help, they say Walz “systematically retaliated against whistleblowers using monitoring, threats, repression,” backed by certain DFL allies and “an indifferent mainstream media.”

They argue the governor also weakened oversight by disempowering the Office of the Legislative Auditor, while “media and politicians supporting Tim Walz or the DFL-agenda attacked whistleblowers.” According to staff, agency leaders appointed by Walz “willfully disregarded rules and laws to keep fraud reports quiet,” even threatening families. Key programs, they say, lacked fraud safeguards “in an attempt to extract more funding from legislature and the federal government.”

Workers claim they witnessed fraud firsthand but were “shut down, reassigned and told to keep quiet,” with no one held accountable. They describe a system “created and maintained by Tim Walz” that fosters retaliation and shields misconduct. Their view of the governor is blunt: “Fundamentally, Tim Walz is dishonest, lacks ethics and integrity,” and misled the public with “inveterate lying” about a budget surplus created by temporary ARPA funds.

---

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.

quote:

---

No I believe my eyes that he’s there a lot

---

quote:

---

No it’s not. Trump is using the national guard the wrong way. You can’t use the army to police regular crime.

---

quote:

---

The dispute centers on a federal statute that allows the president to federalize the National Guard when he is “unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States.”

The Court interpreted “regular forces” to mean the U.S. military, not civilian federal law-enforcement agencies.

That distinction matters because, under long-standing federal law, the military is generally barred from enforcing domestic laws unless Congress has specifically authorized it. The Court said the government did not show that the military could legally carry out the enforcement role described, or that such authority had been triggered.

… Justice Samuel Alito, joined by Justice Clarence Thomas, dissented, arguing that the Court unnecessarily restricted presidential authority and should have allowed the deployment to proceed. Alito pointed out that both parties in earlier briefs treated “regular forces” as meaning federal civilian law enforcement, so the court shouldn’t have raised a new interpretation on its own.

---

quote:

---

The President, by using the militia or the armed forces, or both, or by any other means, shall take such measures as he considers necessary to suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy, if it—

…2) opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes the course of justice under those laws.

---

quote:

---

Whenever—
(1) the United States, or any of the Commonwealths or possessions, is invaded or is in danger of invasion by a foreign nation;
(2) there is a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States; or
(3) the President is unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States;
the President may call into Federal service members and units of the National Guard of any State in such numbers as he considers necessary to repel the invasion, suppress the rebellion, or execute those laws. Orders for these purposes shall be issued through the governors of the States or, in the case of the District of Columbia, through the commanding general of the National Guard of the District of Columbia.

---