- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Live hearing thread
Posted on 9/3/26 at 1:17 pm to ChatGPT of LA
Posted on 9/3/26 at 1:17 pm to ChatGPT of LA
quote:
Not sure that matters. No matter why they did it. Now its federal, if reports are correct. This shite fiasco was unnecessary. Just no fricking reason to go this direction by LSU. As stated, im positive Kiff didn't do this without consulting the correct methods, before proceeding. Feels like someone at LSU will be the fall guy...maybe all the way to Verge himself. (I have NO knowledge of his level of participation)
If nothing else, you are a consistent little moron.
0
Posted on 9/3/26 at 1:17 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
quote:
A federal court in Alabama cannot exercise jurisdiction over a Louisiana state institution (which is an extension of the State of Louisiana).
That is why Rousse, Ausberry, and Kiffin are named in their official capacities. Ex parte Young
LSU itself will get out on 11th amendment immunity.
But that case isn't going anywhere anyway.
Even presuming to, the conduct did not occur in Alabama.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 1:17 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
That is why Rousse, Ausberry, and Kiffin are named in their official capacities. Ex parte Young
Their attorney will argue that they were working for the State .
Posted on 9/3/26 at 1:17 pm to Honkus
quote:
They'll say they "just attended unpaid minicamp(s)" and never "signed a contract".
Which is a clear demonstration of a choice to "move on from college athletics" (Sankey's words, not mine).
Posted on 9/3/26 at 1:17 pm to Tigercowboy
As long as the other teams get to keep their “pro” players then Hunt can go frick himself.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 1:18 pm to More beer please
quote:
I can't imagine the judge is going to be happy about that if he finds out
If you read between the lines, the federal suit is asking for the federal court to enjoin the Louisiana court from holding the SEC in contempt. The state court judge WILL NOT be happy about that.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 1:18 pm to Nix to Twillie
quote:
Hunt saying LSU should wave the white flag.
This represents a pretty significant misunderstanding of legal process. LSU isn't the one pushing the issue, the SEC is. LSU and LK now have to defend themselves and they should avail themselves of all remedies available (inclusive of countersuit).
Posted on 9/3/26 at 1:18 pm to ChatGPT of LA
quote:
ChatGPT of LA
Holy fuk you’re a dumbass!
Posted on 9/3/26 at 1:18 pm to More beer please
I like Hunt, but he is a beta.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 1:18 pm to udtiger
quote:
Even presuming to, the conduct did not occur in Alabama.
The argument will be that it does because of LSU's membership in the SEC, and that the conduct being *allegedly* restrained would occur in Birmingham. But it could lead to a transfer of venue I suppose.
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 1:20 pm
Posted on 9/3/26 at 1:19 pm to Shimoda
quote:
Their attorney will argue that they were working for the State .
And the counter will be Ex Parte Young, i.e. that a state official can be sued in his official capacity in federal court if he is violating federal law (here, that would be the ridiculous first amendment shite the SEC is spinning).
Posted on 9/3/26 at 1:19 pm to UnsureTiger
Bottom line SEC argument fwiw: Louisiana may be able to declare these guys eligible to play college football, but Louisiana cannot force the Southeastern Conference to accept LSU playing them under our banner while preventing us from enforcing our own rules.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 1:19 pm to UpToPar
I just don't see a situation where the judge doesn't hold them in contempt. But I am not a practicing attorney lmfao
Posted on 9/3/26 at 1:20 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
quote:
Even presuming to, the conduct did not occur in Alabama.
The argument will be that it does because of LSU's membership in the SEC, and that the conduct being *allegedly* restrained would occur in Birmingham
Yes, but the conduct restraining is is Louisiana.
If this survives a 12b6, it will be transferred to MDLA
Posted on 9/3/26 at 1:20 pm to UnsureTiger
quote:JaCorey Thomas for anyone wondering
Currently talking about a Georgia player who Georgia refused to allow him to enter the portal. Last name Thomas. Apparently this player wanted to transfer this week which should have been allowed by the current tro and Georgia refused to do so
Posted on 9/3/26 at 1:20 pm to Lsupimp
quote:
Bottom line SEC argument fwiw: Louisiana may be able to declare these guys eligible to play college football, but Louisiana cannot force the Southeastern Conference to accept LSU playing them under our banner while preventing us from enforcing our own rules.
This is correct.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 1:20 pm to IM_4_LSU
Bring in Mike the Tiger to testify 
Posted on 9/3/26 at 1:21 pm to Lsupimp
quote:
preventing us from enforcing our own rules.
Which are? Sankey couldnt even define what a professional athlete is. How can they enforce a rule with no clear definition?
Posted on 9/3/26 at 1:21 pm to Lsupimp
quote:
enforcing our own rules
Ah the rules that were made up last week
Posted on 9/3/26 at 1:21 pm to Nix to Twillie
I agree with him. Sorry for these kids but sometimes life just isn’t fair. Move on. Stop this clown show.
Page 22 of 42
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News